cfields929

7847 pts · March 30, 2014


no we didnt, have a good day lol. hate to be rude but you cant read definitions or conversations without putting your own twist on it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah and I never said a wait time alone is inefficiency, thats why i mentioned the money that taxpayers pay every year on average..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

at least we both agree now that wait times do play a role in how efficient something is

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i tried to have a technical conversation about facts and numbers but then you said time waited and efficiency arent related. Thats incorrect

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it would be possible if efficiency and time were not connected, but thats false. They are.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

please look up ( and read it this time) the definition of "definition" and "general" and see if those two words together make any sense

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah using the dictionary to disprove your claim that efficiency and time arent connected is just so dishonest

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess the healthcare definition just throws time out the window? whats a "general definition"? i quoted the dictionary hahaha

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

idk how 19.8 weeks on average correlates to that analogy but.. lol looks like you control the narrative here

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i like the air quotes you used there haha.. have a good day

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The literal definition of the word proves you wrong.. Was a hard long battle you fought, but it comes to an end lol

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definition of efficient
especially : capable of producing desired results with little or no waste (as of time or materials)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

correct, A wait time by itself is not inefficient. A 20 week wait time is though. You seperating the wait time from the system is your doing

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a system can be inefficient, good try though.. good rebuttal to the facts!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

all for "free healthcare" that taxes every individual harder and they actually all pay for

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

something like an orthopedic surgery takes well more than 6 months on average as well.. these rates have gone up 136% since 1993...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

via torontosun.com in a 2018 study

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you can continue just copying and pasting a link.. i guess thats shorter than the 19.8 weeks on average that they wait for healthcare

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You spent like 7 text boxes saying for something to be efficient there has to be a comparison lol. All you did was link a wiki link. GJ

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope you find help figuring out what "efficiency" means

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something can be inefficient by itself, idk what laws of ideology you're trying for.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hmm, so the results are similar, but they’re paying significantly more in taxes to pay for it

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was simply stating it’s inefficient, not comparing

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Wonder if they're liberal or conservative... i have a guess

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 15

"equivalent outcomes" was pretty funny though

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When did I say our healthcare was more efficient?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I guess canada is a socialist country too then

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

correct

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yep thats the problem, its not one or two policies lol

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

haha did not know that

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1