brainplay

18 pts ยท February 2, 2016


Uh....Roe v Wade was in 1973. Most of these women would have been children.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 22

You mean arresting illegal aliens who aren't supposed to be working in the US?
Their skin color isn't the issue here. Their legal status is the issue here.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 33

What is worse?

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 20

SCOTUS already ruled that they were. So where do you get this idea that they can't? Lower courts have been be throwing on some Temporary Restraining Orders but that's it. And that's a dirty trick since you can't appeal a TRO. Meanwhile, every injunction, which can be appealed, has been won by Trump including the latest.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

Which assassinations are you talking about?
Yes, protests aren't big news if they're common. But I find it funny that the news that has been so antagonistic to Trump is now "doing what they can to silence it for him". You actually believe that? Kid, they got Pulitzers for the Russiagate reporting & that turned out to be a huge hoax. Something they could have found out if they actual investigated.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Your family is here illegally?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 18

Government agents doing a legal action isn't creating a dangerous situation. That would clear any mob to do violence on any law enforcement officer for just about anything.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 77

Its being reported that ICE actually apprehended several people from the restaurant. The people were angry not about the weapons but because people were being detaining for deportation.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

Any shooting by either side would make national news.

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Why would a citizen shoot an ICE officer doing a legal act? What happens when they shoot back?

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 43

Because they're in Cali & know that big talkers might actually try something against them?

9 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Tax all of the churches....so they are no longer hamstrung by tax exempt status so they can make their own SUPER PAC's & openly donate money to candidates. Megachurches can preach which candidate to vote for, canvassing for a candidate would be allowed, & they could buy political ads on TV and the internet. The kind of money they could contribute overall would out pace most other groups.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Ah, Democrat run but blame "trumpers"? Got it. Trump hasn't been President for 2 years... Who is living rent free in your head?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Bullshit. Poll watchers can only challenge ballots after polls are closed & a few are added at the last minute. That's a minuscule amount.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If you look at his proposals, that's exactly what he's thinking about turning the checkmark into. Longer word count, DM priority, etc.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on the number. If 40 million (12%) pick up a checkmark it comes out to almost $4 billion. Twitter addicts will go for it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

She's missing a 0. If 10 million uses, which is still a tiny amount, of the almost 400 million got checkmarks it comes out to $960 million.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

.177 air rifle. Very quiet but not likely for combat. Great for taking small game like rabbits. Something to add to your basic MRE meal.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

#11: Beans UK vs Mexico. I mean imagine putting beans on Pizza. Some food just taste weird together. And UK food.....well...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Them taking so long & the mishaps with poll video cameras only breeds conspiracy theories. How did they screw up again so badly?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 80

ALOT of people across the US are kinda fed up with Maricopa county. A week to count the votes? Large states like CA, TX, & FL did it in 1.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 38

If the newspaper has corrected the "factual inaccuracies" then the case would have been moot. Instead they went all the way to SCOTUS...hmm.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

SCOTUS determines if laws or constitutional or not. Congress makes unconstitutional laws regularly which have to go through the courts.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

"woman's life in danger" is universally accepted as an exception for abortion. Even in the deepest red states.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 114

How is this a "fuck you". SCOTUS literally says it's up to the states not the fed govt (eg more democracy).

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 100

Context: oil had reach -$0.17. Yes, that's NEGATIVE money. The barrel was worth more than the oil, thousands losing jobs.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Now do vaccines.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Kids in foster care are there b/c their parents refuse to give up parental rights or taken by CPS in their teens. Newborns get adopted fast.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

OR...it's b/c they understood that legally the baby could be terminated until it was born.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 28

"Woman' life in danger" is almost universally accepted as an exception for abortion. So what are they going on about?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 25