rimgo

>you fascists< I'm a socialist, bruv. Hence why I despise Russia and Israel; they're both perpetrating a genocide. Oh look, here you are agreeing with me: /gallery/neutrality-face-of-injustice-is-siding-with-oppressor-2Y6rtau

15 hours ago |

Sorry I'm having a hard time hearing you over the sound of this liberal saying Israel's genocide is good actually actually

Sorry I'm having a hard time hearing you over the sound of all the liberals voting "yes" in congress for Trump's illegal war in Iran

Oh hey you're that alt account that loves throwing around slurs while defending genocide.

sorry I'm having a hard time hearing you over the constant overhead roar of US aircraft because Iran's "world class anti-aircraft weapon systems" can't keep US aircraft from the 1980s from constant bombardment

Let's just look at public knowledge right? Kuwait air force shot down 3 friendly F-15s by mistake. The f-15s were returning from a successful bombing run at the time. That means the US is using an aircraft from 1985, whose newest upgrade is from 2017 at the latest, to bomb Iran. Because Iran's military is incapable of shooting them down, despite their supposedly "world class" anti-air weapon systems

As a reminder: japan is the current global leader in both HSR and mag lev technology. If you think China is even in competition with them, you have no concept of what makes a rail system "good" and have believed the chinese propaganda that relies on big numbers to appear better. Japan's mag lev development is due to necessity, as they've reached the effectiveness threshold of HSR, it's literally not possible to do HSR better than they do it.

>a MAGAt would be smiling< exactly. the fact that the person is unhappy but refuaes to do anything about it is how you know they're a liberal. A leftist would step out of the stream and shoot the rich

Behold, citations debunking your bullshit:/gallery/PE81tB0/comment/2495072751 short version: Iran has no capacity to defend itself AND fund Russia, estimates of its drone output are based SOLELY on its support for Russia, its cheap drones can't reliably hit shit (Russia doesnt care and uses them in terror attacks on Ukraine civilians) and the idea that the US is mak8ng no interceptor missiles is based on assuming one type of missile made by one company is the only one made

18 hours ago |

It's a quagmire because there's no benefit nor reason to invade Iran, not because it's impossible. Notice how the US has air superiority, for example, because Iran's got no ability to contest its airspace, and the Iranian response has done basically no damage to the US? The problem with attacking Iran is there's no benefit and its impossible to rule it without exterminating every person who lives there (on top of all the dead people already) so this is just wholesale slaughter for no reason

Ah I see, you believe in debunked bullshit.

Liberalism: claiming you're not a conservative while cheering when people you think are inferior suffer. And if you think "Wait I'm liberal and I dont cheer for people's suffering!" Congrats! You're starting to realize how you've been lied to your whole life about what liberalism is. Liberalism is the belief that capitalism can work as long as you regulate it "enough" and liberals will ALWAYS sacrifice your well being for capitalism when given the choice

Tell me, what secret weapon does Iran have in its military that would allow it to defeat the most powerful military on earth in a straight fight? The risk of invading Iran is not its military in a stand up fight, it's an insurgency that would respond to attempted US occupation, which the US can NEVER defeat

Yea I misstyped cuz I hadnt had my adhd meds yet. I meant that, as with Ukraine, US support casually turned the entire war against Iran, not even US invasion by the full US military. The threat of invading Iran isn't its military, it's insurgents. The US can casually stomp Iran's military and has been doing so. A guerilla war, the US ALWAYS loses

I misstyped yea, I meant that US military support completely turned the tide of the war against Iran, and it wasn't even the actual US military doing the work

And what meaningful reforms have been implemented by Iran's military. Do you even know?

idk if you know but the song is about how he used music to overcome his stutter

Iran literally got its ass handed to it by Iraq until the US stepped in. Their "soldiers" are not assuredly "trained" and "high morale"

my favorite thing is submitting the mclovin fake ID from Superbad to ID verification

yes, and one of the definitions of "consequences" is specific to the individual perpetrating the action. Ergo, no, there are no consequences. And your pedantry remains objectively false.