badinformation

548 pts · January 2, 2018


Still incorrect. He tired juice cleanses and hydrotherapy. Essential oils had nothing to do with it. Surgery was certainly the better option

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Inaccurate. He tried naturopathic first, which was a mistake. He was never a "non-believer" in science and had surgery later.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If he was hung in 48 he was probably hung the whole time. Perhaps he was hanged in 48 as well?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We all are

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

do you have very small arms or do we need to rethink octopus sizing?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nailed it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not gonna lie, you had me in the first half

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Try to stay focused. For both legal and qualification a 401K is “applied to” to net worth. Your original comment is incorrect.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Greetings! Please state the fallacy you believe the OC has used. Otherwise we have no way of validating your claim.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both false equivalency & straw man fallacies. OP can study history and make a meme. Also, OP didn’t directly link war involvement to the CCs

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, it’s applied against your worth. It is not subtracted from your worth. Negative and positive assets can be applied against net worth.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stay on topic. Your 401K is considered an asset applied to your worth. This is true for both tax and qualification purposes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many are hard working middle class Americans with 401ks. Complex problems require thoughtful solutions.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wait what? That is precisely what it means. Increase in controlled assets is counted against your worth. That’s... how it’s defined.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reducing any worldview to a single word is inherently problematic and it’s a shame you feel the need to do so. That said, OC is correct.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You’re swimming in the wrong pool my friend. If you’re looking for market aptitude this isn’t the place.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ignoring the sweeping statements of the lesser educated, it *isn’t* impossible some sell off over time could avoid trashing valuations.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

First time on imgur?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most "pretty much" own their companies? Certainly not. Not at all. Not even close.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

False dichotomy fallacy. People without/with various conditions do/don't behavior in socially deviant ways. More than 2 options exist.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Straw man fallacy. OC definitely didn't say people with disabilities are "monsters" who should be "locked up."

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Quitter

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They don’t bind up as much

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Jokes aside if you want to check in with someone, I’m down to hang for 35 minutes. Ping me and we can sync. Life is hard enough.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Look at this sad, squashed thing

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bold strategy, Cotton

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But what did you learn about eating zebra cock??

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Perhaps consider a re-read of Stalin.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hopefully we will have them soon, and experts will be able to verify to qualify of the research both openly and publicly.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0