13273 pts ยท November 22, 2012
As Mr. Grumpy states, 101 is more efficient. If you choose to drink from graduated containers, you should pick the efficient liquors too :)
If by cattle-catcher you mean that thing is going to catch shit and shove it right into the tracks instead of out, then yes.
8 months? Are you a timelord? :o
I can't stop seeing Prince Oberyn.
*douchebaggage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzypOnklG60
It's like I'm INSIDE her boob veins.
Damn, I forgot to change it back when I ran out of room for my original idea :/
Some say their first track is why Skrillex is missing half his hair; others say their helmets are their to protect us from them.
Be careful, duderanchers might not like you impinging on their business.
the Q portion it simplifies to a baser model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZND_detonation_model
There is no difference. A detonation moving through F/A mix will simply have ongoing heat addition. ZND was created for this. If you remove
You are looking at their progenitors, a shock is a shock. Those are simply examples of various strengths and geometry conditions.
They are both used in computing the values while crossing shock waves, they just have different methods of doing so.
shock itself, not its creator. The creator doesn't matter. There are two theorems, one by Zeldovich (ZDV) and the other iirc is continuity 3
Their strength both depend on the power input and the conditions of the medium you are moving through. The theory is for thinking of the 2
They are one and the same, pressure stacking from a power source. A boom is propagated constantly, an explosive will retard over time. 1
same logic we can explain the nature of bow shocks and their transition into oblique shocks on a craft. Ty for reading, ask me if you have ?
You can imagine a series of circles connected tangentially by a line. As the source increases in speed the slope nears horizontal. By this 9
normal (M = 1) in non-oblique cases, since the circles cannot supersede their maker the speed of expansion of the circles is what matters. 8
From this 194 we should also be able to calculate a rough value of how much power it would take to generate said shock. As for shocks above
Thus this 194 is "unitless", and scales with your normal pressure. That's why you can have shocks that move ridiculously slow in nebulas. 6
point of the medium and create a shock. This 194 dB value is a denotation of that critical pressure. (iirc dB is pressure/pressure(atm)) 5
circles as a pressure rise and a pressure drop, like a square wave. If you stack enough of these on top of each other you break the critical
some critical value based on the medium you are in, these circles begin to stack on one side and touch. We can think of each of these 3
(Picture a single ripple from a stone dropping. Then iterate multiple times as your hand moves in some direction.)
As this object goes faster the traveling edges of the circles get closer together, this is also known as Doppler shift. As you approach 2
I'm gonna have to disagree with mikujess. Classical thought on shock waves is to picture a series of pings of sound coming from an object 1
Tbh this looks like a case of kid-knapping to me
At a glance he kind of looks like a Jake Gyllenfall
As Mr. Grumpy states, 101 is more efficient. If you choose to drink from graduated containers, you should pick the efficient liquors too :)
If by cattle-catcher you mean that thing is going to catch shit and shove it right into the tracks instead of out, then yes.
8 months? Are you a timelord? :o
I can't stop seeing Prince Oberyn.
*douchebaggage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzypOnklG60
It's like I'm INSIDE her boob veins.
Damn, I forgot to change it back when I ran out of room for my original idea :/
Some say their first track is why Skrillex is missing half his hair; others say their helmets are their to protect us from them.
Be careful, duderanchers might not like you impinging on their business.
the Q portion it simplifies to a baser model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZND_detonation_model
There is no difference. A detonation moving through F/A mix will simply have ongoing heat addition. ZND was created for this. If you remove
You are looking at their progenitors, a shock is a shock. Those are simply examples of various strengths and geometry conditions.
They are both used in computing the values while crossing shock waves, they just have different methods of doing so.
shock itself, not its creator. The creator doesn't matter. There are two theorems, one by Zeldovich (ZDV) and the other iirc is continuity 3
Their strength both depend on the power input and the conditions of the medium you are moving through. The theory is for thinking of the 2
They are one and the same, pressure stacking from a power source. A boom is propagated constantly, an explosive will retard over time. 1
same logic we can explain the nature of bow shocks and their transition into oblique shocks on a craft. Ty for reading, ask me if you have ?
You can imagine a series of circles connected tangentially by a line. As the source increases in speed the slope nears horizontal. By this 9
normal (M = 1) in non-oblique cases, since the circles cannot supersede their maker the speed of expansion of the circles is what matters. 8
From this 194 we should also be able to calculate a rough value of how much power it would take to generate said shock. As for shocks above
Thus this 194 is "unitless", and scales with your normal pressure. That's why you can have shocks that move ridiculously slow in nebulas. 6
point of the medium and create a shock. This 194 dB value is a denotation of that critical pressure. (iirc dB is pressure/pressure(atm)) 5
circles as a pressure rise and a pressure drop, like a square wave. If you stack enough of these on top of each other you break the critical
some critical value based on the medium you are in, these circles begin to stack on one side and touch. We can think of each of these 3
(Picture a single ripple from a stone dropping. Then iterate multiple times as your hand moves in some direction.)
As this object goes faster the traveling edges of the circles get closer together, this is also known as Doppler shift. As you approach 2
I'm gonna have to disagree with mikujess. Classical thought on shock waves is to picture a series of pings of sound coming from an object 1
Tbh this looks like a case of kid-knapping to me
At a glance he kind of looks like a Jake Gyllenfall