Xplode441

19054 pts ยท June 12, 2011


Jam out to some tunes: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SrVIWiHBKgE https://youtube.com/watch?v=SrVIWiHBKgE And get out of here stalker. https://youtube.com/watch?v=SrVIWiHBKgE lmao who changed the links in my bio. It's good shit though, I'll keep it.

proven to be true but it could never be proven to be untrue as well. This was the only way they could halt the nomination, curious isn't it?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

proven or disproven is telling as well. He never would have made the appointment had they had their way because the claim could never be

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The fact that they wanted the appointment proceedings placed on hold for a claim that conveniently has no details that can lead to it being

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If people want Kavanaugh investigated, they should investigate Feinstein and her office as well, this whole thing reeks of her involvement.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

corroborate any part of her story? That she had a lie detector test done with no other witnesses, and that's good enough?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

recanted? Ford who can't recall pretty much any definitive details, only enough to keep it vague enough, yet none of the people named could

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who are these "credible witnesses" that we keep hearing about? The lady who said he spiked the punch bowl and then ran a rape train and then

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you think they could have done? There was nothing to investigate.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 19

K

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Socialism follows those same rules you set though.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, when you put it like that, then communism isn't possible to achieve. We already knew that though.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If it's a false claim they should pay for legal fees and the cost of investigation, but only if it's proven false.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

evidence presented and was facing death threats, killed himself. People are beaten to death over false accusations as well.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

suicide because he was drug through the court of Twitter after being accused by a known scumbag of a woman. Was fired from his job with no

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're right, they're worse because it's an innocent person who has their reputation dragged through. We just recently had a lad commit

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

considered a fascist, and I do consider him one because his policies mirrored Hitler and Mussolini's attempts to jumpstart their economies.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

who are not of their nation. Fascism sucks because it can't work economically, but it's not inherently born from malice. FDR can be

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

to justify spending on the military. Fascism is about exclusion, but not necessarily against a certain group, it's about exclusion of those

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

typically do this by spending on military as it tends to be a popular way to spend money with the people. Spending on military leads to wars

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

people before anything else, nationalism. It's predicated on constant government spending to invigorate the economy (sound familiar?) they

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fascism is the social side of stalinism, while pretending to keep private property intact, and it's supposed to promote the welfare of its

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You don't have to prove to me that you don't know what fascism is.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Would you support those programs if they were for everyone, would Bernie? If you answer yes, congratulations you support fascist ideals.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

could it be that you realize that you actually support same social programs the Nazis did?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who in Trump's cabinet thinks we need social welfare programs for whites only? You're clinging onto the "for white Germans" bit too hard,

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It goes against the speech code, why do you fail to admit it?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I love how you're trying to avoid it Can you say Trump is a piece of shit in public with no legal ramifications, can you say it at that uni?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do you deny that it infringes on your first amendment rights?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Literally nothing in there about intent mate.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you said Trump is a shit president, you'd be in violation of this speech code. Do you think you have a right to use that phrase?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1