3648 pts ยท October 10, 2016
with the understand of the Constitution that everyone had before that point. It was formally clarified in 2008,but understood by all earlier
United States (1905), the right of people to bear arms was casually listed as a personal right, not a states right, which is consistant 2/3
Pretty sure individuals had guns during those 217 years, and the Supreme Court protected their right to them. For example, in Trono v. 1/2
household was a compliment, and not an unusual thing to hear. It merely meant "organized and in good working order" not "heavily legislated"
Just to be clear: "well-regulated" never was intended to imply government regulations. Back in the day saying that you had a well-regulated/
Did you do a poll? Carefully research the results of a questionnaire? Or are you just making a strawman based on no information or data?
Amy Coney Barret was a well regarded professor of constitutional law, and certainly not the first Justice who was not a judge before.
Seeing as the president specifically stated that he was looking for a black woman only, I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption.
Apparently her qualifications are that she was a well regarded professor of consitutional law with numerous published law reviews.
Except that other states will actually do something about misdemeanors, but Cali outright won't, since it would "drive up crime rates"
What? Why? He was just helping out
It would work the way you're descibing if there was no competition, but since there is competition costs of distribution are very relevant.
So the people who do pay for things have to cover your goods for you? That's just stealing from them with extra steps.
What do you mean? Your claim was "There's no instances of major retailers raising prices to cover theft" You didn't mention the other person
Yeah, for sure. They let themselves get to that state in the first place by using drugs many times before the addiction kicked in.
you're up on the roof of an elementary school stealing copper from the cooling system. Happened here just a few days ago.
Yes, "desperate". If you're addicted to crack and you haven't had a fix in a few days the desperation can consume you. Next thing you know /
Do you have a source for that bold claim? If thefts are a cost of doing business, why would companies decide not to price it in?
customers. So ultimately, a large portion of the burden of shoplifting lands on the people who actually pay for the goods that they want.
The cost of shoplifting is priced into every item at big name stores. They recoup the theft losses by things costing more for other 1/2
in a certain time period, lets call the cops". That would be absolutely nonsensical, and they couldn't even charge you with a crime anyway.
That doesn't make any sense. Plenty of people buy groceries with cash, a bank will never say "this account didn't make any food purchases 1/
They only schmooze as much as their employer lets them though. And we don't know how tight Epstein held his leash, so to speak.
who among them actually visited the island vs just took a trip from one city to another.
This isn't a list of people who were going anywhere specific, just people who were on plane at any point in time. We still don't know 1/2
These aren't people who went to pedo island, they are just people who ever flew in the plane anywhere.
there's no way of knowing how many of those connections were actually pedos VS just famous people he networked with as a billionaire
Remember that these are just people who went on the plane, not those who visited the island. Epstein had LOADS of famous connections, but /2
Gerrymandering affects Texas Senate voting but doesn't affect governor voting, so it wouldn't matter for Beto.
77000 COVID deaths, of which not all are repub and not allregistered to vote, VS 17 million registered voters. Not a big enough difference
with the understand of the Constitution that everyone had before that point. It was formally clarified in 2008,but understood by all earlier
United States (1905), the right of people to bear arms was casually listed as a personal right, not a states right, which is consistant 2/3
Pretty sure individuals had guns during those 217 years, and the Supreme Court protected their right to them. For example, in Trono v. 1/2
household was a compliment, and not an unusual thing to hear. It merely meant "organized and in good working order" not "heavily legislated"
Just to be clear: "well-regulated" never was intended to imply government regulations. Back in the day saying that you had a well-regulated/
Did you do a poll? Carefully research the results of a questionnaire? Or are you just making a strawman based on no information or data?
Amy Coney Barret was a well regarded professor of constitutional law, and certainly not the first Justice who was not a judge before.
Seeing as the president specifically stated that he was looking for a black woman only, I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption.
Apparently her qualifications are that she was a well regarded professor of consitutional law with numerous published law reviews.
Except that other states will actually do something about misdemeanors, but Cali outright won't, since it would "drive up crime rates"
What? Why? He was just helping out
It would work the way you're descibing if there was no competition, but since there is competition costs of distribution are very relevant.
So the people who do pay for things have to cover your goods for you? That's just stealing from them with extra steps.
What do you mean? Your claim was "There's no instances of major retailers raising prices to cover theft" You didn't mention the other person
Yeah, for sure. They let themselves get to that state in the first place by using drugs many times before the addiction kicked in.
you're up on the roof of an elementary school stealing copper from the cooling system. Happened here just a few days ago.
Yes, "desperate". If you're addicted to crack and you haven't had a fix in a few days the desperation can consume you. Next thing you know /
Do you have a source for that bold claim? If thefts are a cost of doing business, why would companies decide not to price it in?
customers. So ultimately, a large portion of the burden of shoplifting lands on the people who actually pay for the goods that they want.
The cost of shoplifting is priced into every item at big name stores. They recoup the theft losses by things costing more for other 1/2
in a certain time period, lets call the cops". That would be absolutely nonsensical, and they couldn't even charge you with a crime anyway.
That doesn't make any sense. Plenty of people buy groceries with cash, a bank will never say "this account didn't make any food purchases 1/
They only schmooze as much as their employer lets them though. And we don't know how tight Epstein held his leash, so to speak.
who among them actually visited the island vs just took a trip from one city to another.
This isn't a list of people who were going anywhere specific, just people who were on plane at any point in time. We still don't know 1/2
These aren't people who went to pedo island, they are just people who ever flew in the plane anywhere.
there's no way of knowing how many of those connections were actually pedos VS just famous people he networked with as a billionaire
Remember that these are just people who went on the plane, not those who visited the island. Epstein had LOADS of famous connections, but /2
Gerrymandering affects Texas Senate voting but doesn't affect governor voting, so it wouldn't matter for Beto.
77000 COVID deaths, of which not all are repub and not allregistered to vote, VS 17 million registered voters. Not a big enough difference