11721 pts ยท February 24, 2013
Fursona: http://i.imgur.com/UDa44NH.png Me: https://i.imgur.com/y1xDXAN.jpg?1 https://i.imgur.com/gLxn2Rc.jpg Love science, poker, and nerdy stuff in general! Also I'm a femboy! Feel free to chat me up.
So be careful of how quickly you debate someone with a student discount on psychology papers because they just might have the facts...
who had actually suffered abuse, but found that LGBT folks were just as common as heterosexuals to be abused in childhood, statistically.
reviews and fact sheets by organizations or research individuals that carry out scientific study of LGBT individuals, including those 2/3
The SPLC is generally very pro-civil rights, but they also provide 4 separate links on the issue of your topic, the links linking to 1/2
typically report any standard attraction to older men, but only to boys of a younger age." So they aren't homosexuals lol. 2/2
Okay so yes literally right in the paper, paraphrased, "men with attraction to prepubescent or immediately postpubescent boys do not... 1/2
Rather, I should say I love my boyfriend. ^.^
Those groups are often not homosexual men though, they are heterosexuals or others who are attracted to children, not older 1/2
From a 1998 literature review by Dr. McConaghy, p.259 of his review of such studies on pedophilia.
"The man who offends against prepubertal or immediately postpubertal boys is typically not sexually interested in older men or in women"
Gimme like an hour and I'll come back at you with some info from the paper.
men, this makes them pedophiles, not homosexuals. I love men, not children, I'm homosexual lol. 2/2
literally just purchased 24 hour access to an article to read if there are any actual testable links to homosexuality and pedophilia. 2/2
You misunderstand the sociological and scientific settings behind this, I love when people like you use the echo chamber, when I 1/2
Most of the time, stuff "pro-pedophile" is just people realizing pedophiles need help, not demonization too.
Well that's... then why link when I was talking about LGBT stuff lol
So I have to take you on what you posted, not what you meant... now fuck off m8.
LGBT folks. You can claim that's not what you meant or victimization on my part, but those two posts of yours were one right after another.
to make this accepted." With the next group you posted being an LGBT advocacy group, the only assumption is by "people" you mean 2/3
This was where you linked it to us, like so many others did, your last post to this having just said "some people unironically trying 1/2
"You must not have read the link. It's literally the oldest LGBT group that it's referencing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COC_Nederland"
You were even the one, with your link, who thought LGBT people like COC were trying to destigmatize pedophilia, WHICH WE AREN'T.
Some people were dumb enough to take it legitimately seriously, and the pride color association points to a group... 3/3
was developed on 4chan as a way to troll LGBT friendly people to see if anyone would actually accept that as an orientation. 2/3
That's literally what this post is, to think otherwise is dumb. The colors on that flag are trans associated flag colors, the post 1/2
I was simply clarifying that point, that no one LGBT was trying to destigmatize it as a legitimate orientation lolol.
like this post did. Leave us the fuck alone, we literally are the biggest fighters of pedophilia lol. 2/2
And THAT was where my point came in, those people trying to actually make pedophilia okay aren't LGBT groups... so why link it to us 1/2
Quote by you, the part I was clarifying.
"The end result will be destigmatizing it and accepting it as a sexual preference. It's inherently wrong, because children can't consent."
So be careful of how quickly you debate someone with a student discount on psychology papers because they just might have the facts...
who had actually suffered abuse, but found that LGBT folks were just as common as heterosexuals to be abused in childhood, statistically.
reviews and fact sheets by organizations or research individuals that carry out scientific study of LGBT individuals, including those 2/3
The SPLC is generally very pro-civil rights, but they also provide 4 separate links on the issue of your topic, the links linking to 1/2
typically report any standard attraction to older men, but only to boys of a younger age." So they aren't homosexuals lol. 2/2
Okay so yes literally right in the paper, paraphrased, "men with attraction to prepubescent or immediately postpubescent boys do not... 1/2
Rather, I should say I love my boyfriend. ^.^
Those groups are often not homosexual men though, they are heterosexuals or others who are attracted to children, not older 1/2
From a 1998 literature review by Dr. McConaghy, p.259 of his review of such studies on pedophilia.
"The man who offends against prepubertal or immediately postpubertal boys is typically not sexually interested in older men or in women"
Gimme like an hour and I'll come back at you with some info from the paper.
men, this makes them pedophiles, not homosexuals. I love men, not children, I'm homosexual lol. 2/2
literally just purchased 24 hour access to an article to read if there are any actual testable links to homosexuality and pedophilia. 2/2
You misunderstand the sociological and scientific settings behind this, I love when people like you use the echo chamber, when I 1/2
Most of the time, stuff "pro-pedophile" is just people realizing pedophiles need help, not demonization too.
Well that's... then why link when I was talking about LGBT stuff lol
So I have to take you on what you posted, not what you meant... now fuck off m8.
LGBT folks. You can claim that's not what you meant or victimization on my part, but those two posts of yours were one right after another.
to make this accepted." With the next group you posted being an LGBT advocacy group, the only assumption is by "people" you mean 2/3
This was where you linked it to us, like so many others did, your last post to this having just said "some people unironically trying 1/2
"You must not have read the link. It's literally the oldest LGBT group that it's referencing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COC_Nederland"
You were even the one, with your link, who thought LGBT people like COC were trying to destigmatize pedophilia, WHICH WE AREN'T.
Some people were dumb enough to take it legitimately seriously, and the pride color association points to a group... 3/3
was developed on 4chan as a way to troll LGBT friendly people to see if anyone would actually accept that as an orientation. 2/3
That's literally what this post is, to think otherwise is dumb. The colors on that flag are trans associated flag colors, the post 1/2
I was simply clarifying that point, that no one LGBT was trying to destigmatize it as a legitimate orientation lolol.
like this post did. Leave us the fuck alone, we literally are the biggest fighters of pedophilia lol. 2/2
And THAT was where my point came in, those people trying to actually make pedophilia okay aren't LGBT groups... so why link it to us 1/2
Quote by you, the part I was clarifying.
"The end result will be destigmatizing it and accepting it as a sexual preference. It's inherently wrong, because children can't consent."