1715 pts ยท December 4, 2016
Bills regardless of how good that thing is. 2/2
It's false if you're equating goals rather than method. The method is the issue. We shouldn't be fine with sliding stuff into unrelated 1/
To Deadmau5
$950 for that model, not $2000
Zton Jingai Animation A Beautiful Greed Nulu Nulu, for those curious
https://imgur.com/fkPvEny
A moose once bit my sister
It. Sorry, but you're mistaken when it comes to the survey. 5/5
Question that's vague enough with a hint of implied connection, which allows people to assume parts of it to think what they want about 4/
Virus. As far as anyone can reasonably say from the survey, that 38% didn't drink Corona to begin with and still feel that way. It's a 3/
Is the only thing that connects it to the virus at all, however it holds no weight without data showing its any different than before the 2/
I have looked at it, and I was specifically talking about the 38% question which doesn't mention the virus. The "now" at the end of it 1/
To begin with. 5/5
At best we can say the news twisted a study that has some poorly worded questions, or the survey was purposefully trying to imply that 4/
With, and a devious use of the word "now" to imply it's because of the virus without anything actually suggesting that's the case. 3/
More specific info you can't tell how much of that percent is actually cause of the virus, it's just people not drinking Corona to begin 2/
They aren't characterized the same tho. The news connects the 38% to being because of the virus when that was never the case. Without 1/
To take this poll as anything serious without more info on the questions asked is rather foolish 5/5
Question is just an easy way to imply a connection to the virus without actually asking about it, which gives a much different result. 4/
Before the virus. Lots of people don't like Corona and wouldn't buy it under any circumstances to begin with. The now at the end of the 3/
"would you buy Corona under any circumstances now?" 38% said they would not, but that doesn't mean much without knowing what they'd say 2/
The poll is real, but a lot of people don't seem to be aware of how easy it is to manipulate the data with how the questions are asked. 1/
https://mobile.twitter.com/cnni/status/1233393636672446464
Would like to be using for further advancements in tech. Fusion will be better than nothing, but hardly an end to worrying about helium 4/4
Increasing that amount thousands of times to catch up to just our current consumption. There's also the question of how much more we 3/
News is a reactor that wouldn't use D-T fusion, although that reactor sounds too good to be true currently so who knows) and then 2/
It won't produce anywhere close to what we use. Would take replacing global power generation with the right fusion reaction (the latest 1/
Like your boss cares enough to have you stay in good health rather than just working to death
Did they actually tell you to stop trying, or did they just tell you to not push yourself as hard? Unless I'm missing something it sounds 1/
Bills regardless of how good that thing is. 2/2
It's false if you're equating goals rather than method. The method is the issue. We shouldn't be fine with sliding stuff into unrelated 1/
To Deadmau5
$950 for that model, not $2000
Zton Jingai Animation A Beautiful Greed Nulu Nulu, for those curious
https://imgur.com/fkPvEny
A moose once bit my sister
It. Sorry, but you're mistaken when it comes to the survey. 5/5
Question that's vague enough with a hint of implied connection, which allows people to assume parts of it to think what they want about 4/
Virus. As far as anyone can reasonably say from the survey, that 38% didn't drink Corona to begin with and still feel that way. It's a 3/
Is the only thing that connects it to the virus at all, however it holds no weight without data showing its any different than before the 2/
I have looked at it, and I was specifically talking about the 38% question which doesn't mention the virus. The "now" at the end of it 1/
To begin with. 5/5
At best we can say the news twisted a study that has some poorly worded questions, or the survey was purposefully trying to imply that 4/
With, and a devious use of the word "now" to imply it's because of the virus without anything actually suggesting that's the case. 3/
More specific info you can't tell how much of that percent is actually cause of the virus, it's just people not drinking Corona to begin 2/
They aren't characterized the same tho. The news connects the 38% to being because of the virus when that was never the case. Without 1/
To take this poll as anything serious without more info on the questions asked is rather foolish 5/5
Question is just an easy way to imply a connection to the virus without actually asking about it, which gives a much different result. 4/
Before the virus. Lots of people don't like Corona and wouldn't buy it under any circumstances to begin with. The now at the end of the 3/
"would you buy Corona under any circumstances now?" 38% said they would not, but that doesn't mean much without knowing what they'd say 2/
The poll is real, but a lot of people don't seem to be aware of how easy it is to manipulate the data with how the questions are asked. 1/
https://mobile.twitter.com/cnni/status/1233393636672446464
Would like to be using for further advancements in tech. Fusion will be better than nothing, but hardly an end to worrying about helium 4/4
Increasing that amount thousands of times to catch up to just our current consumption. There's also the question of how much more we 3/
News is a reactor that wouldn't use D-T fusion, although that reactor sounds too good to be true currently so who knows) and then 2/
It won't produce anywhere close to what we use. Would take replacing global power generation with the right fusion reaction (the latest 1/
Like your boss cares enough to have you stay in good health rather than just working to death
Did they actually tell you to stop trying, or did they just tell you to not push yourself as hard? Unless I'm missing something it sounds 1/