1382 pts ยท September 15, 2014
Ah, apologies, I took your original comment to mean the opposite.
But this does not preclude a conversation, feel free to contact me. It's difficult to have discussions in 140 characters...
Tut, tut. Now who's making "declarative statement"? Nothing wrong with being trans, something wrong with trying to bypass science. 1
By the standards of most liberal minded scientists, they did indeed. Otherwise you wouldn't have heard about it :).
Ha, so being trans is psychological and not inate, got it, thanks.
Haha, love it. I can play too. "manslut" - homophobe. 'Cause if gender is a social construct then being gay is a choice, homophobe.
If so, why would they need hormone replacements and surgery?
Unless you have Eisenberg Compensator in your transporter unit.
You know they did this to prove that intersectional feminism and gender theory was bull, right?
a very small minority. Other genetic deformities of genitalia are rare and unrelated to sex and/or gender.
No, not really, at least not from a genetics point of view. In most cases XX = female = vagina, XY = male = penis. Intersexed people are
Ah, here we go, in a post about factual science someone starts on the gender theory nonsense....
around ready when they need to.
You're not wrong wrt the no knock thing, but I don't think it will stop what we saw. Sure, you'll slow them down, but they'll have a work
Maybe it's just a drop in the bucket, but still...
and it did look like it benefited cops on several occasions in the cases they presented anyway.
Well, as a Canadian, we don't have such a thing as qualified immunity, but the institute for justice did make a few videos on the subject
I'm just afraid that politicians are just blowing smoke making laws that change very little and making grandiose claims of it...
less than lethal rules of engagement, higher salaries, bigger consequences, etc., etc., etc. Sure we can make small steps towards this,
education (4+ years/BA in policing), demilitarization, defund the police unions, easier prosecution of cops, removal of qualified immunity,
Well... hiring practices, protection on whistleblowers, psychological requirements for officers, psychological testing, training,
Something more substantial than that or "defund the police" is needed.
Not my point. My Point is that even if you force cameras and stop no-knock warrant, the problem will not simply go away.
The fact that they have cams and did "follow the law" doesn't mean they won't barge in and kill innocent people anyway.
Ah, apologies, I took your original comment to mean the opposite.
But this does not preclude a conversation, feel free to contact me. It's difficult to have discussions in 140 characters...
Tut, tut. Now who's making "declarative statement"? Nothing wrong with being trans, something wrong with trying to bypass science. 1
By the standards of most liberal minded scientists, they did indeed. Otherwise you wouldn't have heard about it :).
Ha, so being trans is psychological and not inate, got it, thanks.
Haha, love it. I can play too. "manslut" - homophobe. 'Cause if gender is a social construct then being gay is a choice, homophobe.
If so, why would they need hormone replacements and surgery?
Unless you have Eisenberg Compensator in your transporter unit.
You know they did this to prove that intersectional feminism and gender theory was bull, right?
a very small minority. Other genetic deformities of genitalia are rare and unrelated to sex and/or gender.
No, not really, at least not from a genetics point of view. In most cases XX = female = vagina, XY = male = penis. Intersexed people are
Ah, here we go, in a post about factual science someone starts on the gender theory nonsense....
around ready when they need to.
You're not wrong wrt the no knock thing, but I don't think it will stop what we saw. Sure, you'll slow them down, but they'll have a work
Maybe it's just a drop in the bucket, but still...
and it did look like it benefited cops on several occasions in the cases they presented anyway.
Well, as a Canadian, we don't have such a thing as qualified immunity, but the institute for justice did make a few videos on the subject
I'm just afraid that politicians are just blowing smoke making laws that change very little and making grandiose claims of it...
less than lethal rules of engagement, higher salaries, bigger consequences, etc., etc., etc. Sure we can make small steps towards this,
education (4+ years/BA in policing), demilitarization, defund the police unions, easier prosecution of cops, removal of qualified immunity,
Well... hiring practices, protection on whistleblowers, psychological requirements for officers, psychological testing, training,
Something more substantial than that or "defund the police" is needed.
Not my point. My Point is that even if you force cameras and stop no-knock warrant, the problem will not simply go away.
The fact that they have cams and did "follow the law" doesn't mean they won't barge in and kill innocent people anyway.