13232 pts ยท April 16, 2015
WE HAVE SO MUCH SHIT!
It's called the heartbeat bill for a reason. It forbids abortions after fetal heartbeat is detected.
At 5 weeks constitutes the unlawful ending of a human life.
This is illogical for a number of reasons, but they are going to jail because the state of Alabama has determined that killing a fetus at
No woman is going to jail. The bill holds the Drs responsible. But sure, complain about a bill you haven't bothered to read.
No woman is going to jail. It's the doctors that are held responsible.
A woman proposed the bill though...
When you consider personhood to begin. (Not saying I'm pro life or pro choice, just laying out the arguments at hand.)
Proponents of the bill believe), then from their perspective it makes perfect sense, since murder is a worse crime than rape. All depends on
Jail time. If it's not the taking of a human life then of course it shouldn't. If someone believes it is the ending of a babies life (as the
If (and this is for the sake of argument) performing an abortion is the ending of a human life, then of course it would result in longer
Holy fuck this is badass. I wish my school had had dueling fraternities
I'm assuming they mean men working on a tunnel boring machine. Can confirm it is all men.
What if I told you that you can still support a cause without dumping taxpayer money in to it
Since women can just break the law, or drive to another state actually, by your logic then they still have a choice.
Can't do to get out of their obligations legally. So you've already been wrong twice, should we try for the triple?
Choice since they can just break the law as well. Or just drive to another state and get the abortion legally, which is something men also
Have a choice because they can break the law to get away from the negative consequences of an unplanned child, then women still have a
Ok so you don't know what that phrase means, but I'm assuming you meant false equivalency, which it is also not. If you're saying men still
People by the government, mentioning that people can broke those laws is entirely irrelevant to the debate.
By breaking the law. What should we do, make it MORE illegal to skip out on child support? We're talking about the choices given to
Right, so just killing the kid is the most humane thing to do.
Multiple rapes/murders.
Let's put on our special thinking caps and see of we can spot the difference between an unwanted child and a person who's been convicted of
Support. Men have zero choice in the matter.
Accidentally gets a woman pregnant, he can hope she aborts, hope she puts it up for adoption, or hope she doesn't make him pay child
Men already do have to put their lives on hold. The state can force a man to pay child support at the mother's discretion. Once a man
Abortion clearly violates the bodily autonomy of the baby. What is the call then?
In the case of a less polarizing example, let's look at an abortion taking place a week before the child is due. In that instance, an
But what of someone uses their bodily autonomy to violate someone else's bodily autonomy?
WE HAVE SO MUCH SHIT!
It's called the heartbeat bill for a reason. It forbids abortions after fetal heartbeat is detected.
At 5 weeks constitutes the unlawful ending of a human life.
This is illogical for a number of reasons, but they are going to jail because the state of Alabama has determined that killing a fetus at
No woman is going to jail. The bill holds the Drs responsible. But sure, complain about a bill you haven't bothered to read.
No woman is going to jail. It's the doctors that are held responsible.
A woman proposed the bill though...
When you consider personhood to begin. (Not saying I'm pro life or pro choice, just laying out the arguments at hand.)
Proponents of the bill believe), then from their perspective it makes perfect sense, since murder is a worse crime than rape. All depends on
Jail time. If it's not the taking of a human life then of course it shouldn't. If someone believes it is the ending of a babies life (as the
If (and this is for the sake of argument) performing an abortion is the ending of a human life, then of course it would result in longer
Holy fuck this is badass. I wish my school had had dueling fraternities
I'm assuming they mean men working on a tunnel boring machine. Can confirm it is all men.
What if I told you that you can still support a cause without dumping taxpayer money in to it
Since women can just break the law, or drive to another state actually, by your logic then they still have a choice.
Can't do to get out of their obligations legally. So you've already been wrong twice, should we try for the triple?
Choice since they can just break the law as well. Or just drive to another state and get the abortion legally, which is something men also
Have a choice because they can break the law to get away from the negative consequences of an unplanned child, then women still have a
Ok so you don't know what that phrase means, but I'm assuming you meant false equivalency, which it is also not. If you're saying men still
People by the government, mentioning that people can broke those laws is entirely irrelevant to the debate.
By breaking the law. What should we do, make it MORE illegal to skip out on child support? We're talking about the choices given to
Right, so just killing the kid is the most humane thing to do.
Multiple rapes/murders.
Let's put on our special thinking caps and see of we can spot the difference between an unwanted child and a person who's been convicted of
Support. Men have zero choice in the matter.
Accidentally gets a woman pregnant, he can hope she aborts, hope she puts it up for adoption, or hope she doesn't make him pay child
Men already do have to put their lives on hold. The state can force a man to pay child support at the mother's discretion. Once a man
Abortion clearly violates the bodily autonomy of the baby. What is the call then?
In the case of a less polarizing example, let's look at an abortion taking place a week before the child is due. In that instance, an
But what of someone uses their bodily autonomy to violate someone else's bodily autonomy?