I dedicate this to all the girls who wouldn't sleep with me, and all the girls who slept with me and realized their mistake. I'd dedicate this to the girls who have slept with me and enjoyed it, but this has to be dedicated to someone. Here's my puppy http://i.imgur.com/VKQKybY.jpg sleeping away, all cute and fluffy. Editor's note: Vito, TheThingNoNotThatOne's puppy, was taken to a farm upstate to chase rabbits and herd all TheThing's party guests into 1 room and bark loudly when one went to the bathroom. He left 9-15-2015 at roughly 7:30PM. He is survived by his family. He was a good boy.
The jump scare of the dog sitting up while feeding and her titties out knocked me out of my chair
Weird, because you're not sharing them. And if you have to pay close attention to get the message, you're failing at politics.
Trump's campaign was simple "deport them all" "get men out of women's sports" "tariff other countries to make our economy great." He might have maybe sometimes mentioned how, but he repeatedly gave clear, concise promises on what his goals were.
Great. Normal people aren't reading, let alone reading the ACLU's website. Where were those speeches talking about the equity act? Why wasn't she on the debate stage saying "I'm going to protect gay and trans people!" instead of saying "I'm going to follow the law that forces me to help LGBT people."
Look, you an sit here and link your Midas Touch articles and try to defend her campaign, but if it was good, she would have won. Her policies weren't the problem, it was the marketing.
"I want to form a committee to explore the possibility of establishing a focus group to discuss the viability of a panel's recommendation to remove the procedural hurdles that could block us from protecting abortion" is a lot less inspiring to the average person than "I am going to pass a law protecting abortion at 20 weeks because it's the woman's right to choose."
She's not talking about abortion, she's talking about procedural rules that stop her from doing what she wants. Thats bad politics
Well it's good to know you've given up and have accepted that you'll be under Trump's dictatorship for the rest of your life.
I, on the other hand, believe that we should fight back and oppose him, in the hope that we can sway enough people to save the country. Unlike you, I don't like what's going on and want to try to change it.
Because she's (allegedly) a leading figure in the Democratic party and should be using the fear and anger people are feeling to drive support to leftists and leftist policies across the country and to lay the groundwork for local elections and the midterms.
You know, doing politics. That may be too much to ask of a politician, but I don't think I should be insulted for asking for it.
Because she's (allegedly) a leading figure in the Democratic party and should be using the fear and anger people are feeling to drive support to leftists and leftist policies across the country and to lay the groundwork for local elections and the midterms.
You know, doing politics. That may be too much to ask of a politician, but I don't think I should be insulted for asking for it.
Why is Bernie and AOC doing a speaking tour? Because they're vain, or because they understand that now is the time to seize the moment to rally support for leftist policies and energize people to not only oppose Trump on the national level, but to get leftists into office on the local level and get momentum for 2028.
I mean, did Trump and Republicans sit quietly after Biden won in 2020?
What's so bad faith about saying "Kamala ran a milqtoast campaign of status quo/'I'm not Trump' that created so much apathy people didn't turn out to vote for her"? If she ran a perfect campaign, she would have won. And don't tell me "America is just too racist and misogynistic for her to win" because no only is that not true, it's a cop-out designed to justify Democrats' continued push to the right.
Yes, for people paying extremely close attention, she moved herself slightly over. But for the vast majority of people, she came off as more of the same. Sure, she wanted a ceasefire, but she also backed Israel and refused to acknowledge the genocide. What was her plan on protecting trans and abortion rights? I didn't hear one - legislation, amendment, agency decisions?
This idea that there was no way to overcome racism and misogyny in voters is a cop-out so Democrats can refuse to change.
But I guess he's a correct cunt, if all you have are insults instead of rebuttals
You're right, and the sad part is that everyone on here is going to call you a moron just so they can avoid the uncomfortable truth that simply being "not Trump" wasn't good enough to win. Especially when her platform was "everything Biden was doing" aka a bunch of policies that everyone hated.
"You're the bad one, I'm perfect!" is the worst way to analyze a loss.
She specifically courted centrist Republicans. She couldn't explain how she was going to be different from Biden (who was hated). She said she'd have a Republican in her cabinet (the same party we recognize as terrible). She advocated for status quo economics in a time when people were hurting. She backed Israel. She never said "I'll protect trans and abortion rights" and only said "Trump is going to take them away."
Sure. But where is she now? Why isn't she out saying "I told you so" and "this wouldn't have happened under my watch"? Why isn't she continuing to beat the drum to stand up to Trump, and supporting politicians who are? Why isn't she on the news or tweeting or podcasting that Trump and Republicans are dangerous Nazis?
The difference is that when a large business changes its name, it's more than slapping a different logo on their building (a la changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico) - they have to refile a bunch of incorporation paperwork, SEC filings, etc., which can cause some contracts to become null as the old business is effectively dissolved and a new business is created.
Cops don't shut off your water, the utility company does.
No, I understand why they were happy and I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner. I just don't know why people who hate the idea of mass deportations...want mass deportations. Why are you cheering Trump on as he deports this law-abiding immigrant? Why are you helping Trump by calling ICE on undocumented immigrants? Because you disagree with their politics?
You can't defeat fascism by becoming a fascist.
Revenge, schadenfreude, get what you voted for - whatever you want to call it, it's still celebrating fascism.
Except there was no indication that she would have done much to stop the genocide. Sure, Trump is going to open the floodgates, but Kamala was just going to keep the current level of genocide
The green text of "look it up, it's true" is what sells this idea to me
Huge "shhh shhh don't tell mom, please don't tell mom" moments
No, when a major stakeholder decides to sell a significant portion of their stock, they have to declare it ahead of time. Precisely to avoid pump and dump. There are obviously ways around it, but it can't just sell it all off in a moment
That's why it's The Convincer - one sip and you'll be convinced to quit
You're right, the world is black and white. Everything is good or bad, there is no gray or balancing of multiple factors. Fuck Kamala, you should run for president since the answers are that obvious to you.
Obviously there's no secular, integrated private or charter schools, and naturally everyone learns the exact same way and are at the exact same knowledge and skill level for their grade. There's zero benefit to taking your kid out of public school.
I'm speaking generally. There are multiple ways to institute that law, and 500 characters isn't enough to talk about each way. Also, not sure how that contradicts my claim that the problems outweigh the benefits.
Not inherently. They usually allow parents to get vouchers to send their children to private/charter schools, which could provide certain accommodations or learning techniques the public schools can't/don't provide.
Of course, this takes money out of public schools and puts it in the pockets of the owners of private/charter schools, and those schools may be bad. Personally, the problems generally outweigh the benefits, but it's a complicated topic.
I mean, look at the excitement Democrats have for not-Biden right now, and look at the number of polls that had Biden behind over the last month (before and after the debate).
Maybe there are some wild, out of the ordinary polls, but when the polls consistently, week after week, indicate Biden is dragging behind Trump in swing states and behind down ballot candidates, the inconsistency of an individual poll is meaningless
A lot of that defeatism came from the fact that Biden was lagging in the polls even before the debate, and it only worsened afterward.
And yet, it was those public demands he step down that actually got him to step down and for a more exciting candidate to take his place. Funny how publicly advocating for a position not only changes minds but can accomplish things.