411 pts ยท October 13, 2014
Are people really that stupid as to click on an ad on a porn site that promises to make your dick bigger??
Im always confused as to how the ads are paid for. Anything my friend has ever seen has only ever looked like a phising attempt. 1
3 socialism MAY take the form of state ownership of capital such as in Marxism-Leninism, but socialism may take many forms, like capitalism.
2 when people do not see the fruits of their labour it is not socialism. Socialism requires high equality in distribution of wealth.
Not when it isn't democratised and communalised. If that was so then Russia's Gazprom is an example of socialism, but it is state capitalism
Means of production and thus is capitalist. Sweden used to be a lot more socialist economy but now is social market economy.
Who have redistributive measures to correct for market failures. It is very soft socialism but ultimately relies on private ownership of the
That is the broad definition of socialism. What you talk about is social democracy, which is places like Germany and Sweden and France,
Society which thrives on mutual prosperity, each according to need etc etc. Socialism serves as a means to wither away the state.
Ownership of the means of production. That, along with other social, political, and economic reforms, then leads to a stateless and moneyles
Socialists reject the free market as ill conceived and further as a method of exploiting workers. They favour democratisation and social
No it isn't. A socialist economy rejects private ownership of the means of production, and is a transitionary phase towards Communism.
And not by the worker.
Post-Dengist China are state capitalist, even if they are nominally socialist, as the means of production is owned by a corporate govt
It's a system wherein the state limits political and economic freedoms, acts like a big corporation by itself. Countries like venezuela and
State capitalism is an authoritarian form of market economy. It's not a free market by any means. It isn't capitalism as America knows it.
If those aren't socialist, then there's never been a socialist country. State control of capital doesn't equate to socialism, just autocracy
Venezuelan govt spendinf is only ~30% of GDP, less than either France or Sweden. State seizure of capital does not equate to socialism.
Mixed market economy like Russia.
It also isn't oligarchy like in Venezuela. Venezuela's govt spending as % of GDP is less than both Sweden or France. It is an authoritarian
Nuclear deterrent so that nobody can collapse the regime.
Most. Its policy is war footing and propaganda to maintain illusion of necessity of the regime to keep the people in line, and develop MAD
Damage by nuking everyone around them in the event that they are attacked. It has no capability of hitting USA. It can maybe hit Japan at
DPRK doesn't want to attack USA. DPRK realises that such would be a death wish. DPRK wants to be able to ensure that it can cause enough
Russia and Turkey have great capitalist economies. :)
I mean ... if you call 40m people living in poverty a success, then sure ... ?
(Poor who Maduro used to rely on) led to total economic collapse. Chaved and Madueo = oligarchy, corruption, and very poor economic planning
Was rigid and brittle, market failures coupled with refusal to reform the economy (for corruption but also because it would hurt the )
Relied on state capitalism in an undiversified economy to generate income to redistribute, rather than create a social market. Market
Both. Chavez's administration failed to develop the economy beyond petroleum. Maduro is incompetent. Both refused to lift price restrictions
Are people really that stupid as to click on an ad on a porn site that promises to make your dick bigger??
Im always confused as to how the ads are paid for. Anything my friend has ever seen has only ever looked like a phising attempt. 1
3 socialism MAY take the form of state ownership of capital such as in Marxism-Leninism, but socialism may take many forms, like capitalism.
2 when people do not see the fruits of their labour it is not socialism. Socialism requires high equality in distribution of wealth.
Not when it isn't democratised and communalised. If that was so then Russia's Gazprom is an example of socialism, but it is state capitalism
Means of production and thus is capitalist. Sweden used to be a lot more socialist economy but now is social market economy.
Who have redistributive measures to correct for market failures. It is very soft socialism but ultimately relies on private ownership of the
That is the broad definition of socialism. What you talk about is social democracy, which is places like Germany and Sweden and France,
Society which thrives on mutual prosperity, each according to need etc etc. Socialism serves as a means to wither away the state.
Ownership of the means of production. That, along with other social, political, and economic reforms, then leads to a stateless and moneyles
Socialists reject the free market as ill conceived and further as a method of exploiting workers. They favour democratisation and social
No it isn't. A socialist economy rejects private ownership of the means of production, and is a transitionary phase towards Communism.
And not by the worker.
Post-Dengist China are state capitalist, even if they are nominally socialist, as the means of production is owned by a corporate govt
It's a system wherein the state limits political and economic freedoms, acts like a big corporation by itself. Countries like venezuela and
State capitalism is an authoritarian form of market economy. It's not a free market by any means. It isn't capitalism as America knows it.
If those aren't socialist, then there's never been a socialist country. State control of capital doesn't equate to socialism, just autocracy
Venezuelan govt spendinf is only ~30% of GDP, less than either France or Sweden. State seizure of capital does not equate to socialism.
Mixed market economy like Russia.
It also isn't oligarchy like in Venezuela. Venezuela's govt spending as % of GDP is less than both Sweden or France. It is an authoritarian
Nuclear deterrent so that nobody can collapse the regime.
Most. Its policy is war footing and propaganda to maintain illusion of necessity of the regime to keep the people in line, and develop MAD
Damage by nuking everyone around them in the event that they are attacked. It has no capability of hitting USA. It can maybe hit Japan at
DPRK doesn't want to attack USA. DPRK realises that such would be a death wish. DPRK wants to be able to ensure that it can cause enough
Russia and Turkey have great capitalist economies. :)
I mean ... if you call 40m people living in poverty a success, then sure ... ?
(Poor who Maduro used to rely on) led to total economic collapse. Chaved and Madueo = oligarchy, corruption, and very poor economic planning
Was rigid and brittle, market failures coupled with refusal to reform the economy (for corruption but also because it would hurt the )
Relied on state capitalism in an undiversified economy to generate income to redistribute, rather than create a social market. Market
Both. Chavez's administration failed to develop the economy beyond petroleum. Maduro is incompetent. Both refused to lift price restrictions