26715 pts ยท October 22, 2016
in their minds it's their money that's involved. It's obviously wrong and bat shit insane but that's how they view it. 2/2
Easy. In their minds "tax cuts" are giving people back THEIR money. Loan forgiveness is perceived as giving away THEIR money. Either way 1/
This is going to clear nothing up for anyone you might send it to. Those who need to know it will reject it and everyone else already knows.
The great irony here is that the people who want to be controlled the least (the freedumb lovers) are the ones afraid of a rudderless world.
Not sure if still the case but a lot of people used to post then set it to hidden after but not quick enough for people not to hit it.
Da fuck?
I don't care what's going on... it can be the apocalypse and this would still be fucking funny.
He's doing this just to rile up his base.
That might work in theory, but when you consider the curated nature of the content and the content these people go to. It wouldn't work.
I've been trying to explain to people that if you search for something on Google 9 times out of 10 you'll find it, regardless of any truth.
Double standards. Hypocrisy is for people who feel shame about it. These people feel no shame. Namely because double standards are the goal.
I love this. I don't know why I love it, but I love it.
None of this should surprise anyone at this point. We have a reality TV presidency run by a guy who treats reality like it's TV.
I love you too ya little shit.
This Mrs Nastassia Sablina sounds legit. You know, on account of being both a him and a Mrs. Can't argue with a fat wad of cash after all.
Cause he's an old fat fuck and letting gravity do the work of compressing your fat is easier than trying to suck it in? I guess?
Must... resist... Monica reference... ARRRGHHHHH
I very much wanted it to be what we all thought it was... but it wasn't. He is obviously tucking in his shirt. Hate the man, but don't lie.
This is especially true given how many lie or pretend to be something they're not to win. 2/2
I don't like the idea of representatives going off their personal beliefs. They are there to represent the voters not themselves. 1/
Rofl I forgot about the light up the ass
You may very well be right, but there aren't as many willing to go along with burning it to the ground as he and his supporters believe.
Procedurally he wouldn't have the power to do that without risking another civil war. This is gonna come down to Trump or America, not both.
This isn't a choose your own adventure situation. If both parties have a claim it either gets resolved or his term ends.
they went into service. Your argument is valid, his is not. He's just a lazy entitled coward who demands double standards in life. 3/3
made it very clear over the decades what his opinion on soldiers and war was. Going so far as to threaten disownment of his children if 2/
That's the difference. You're making an argument against the Vietnam war in general. Trump wouldn't serve in any capacity for any war and 1/
potentially remove Trump by force. Though it wouldn't be the "military" per se, it'd be US Marshals. 4/4
in The White House. Legally, constitutionally Pelosi would become President. They would have to follow her orders, including an order to 3/
in their minds it's their money that's involved. It's obviously wrong and bat shit insane but that's how they view it. 2/2
Easy. In their minds "tax cuts" are giving people back THEIR money. Loan forgiveness is perceived as giving away THEIR money. Either way 1/
This is going to clear nothing up for anyone you might send it to. Those who need to know it will reject it and everyone else already knows.
The great irony here is that the people who want to be controlled the least (the freedumb lovers) are the ones afraid of a rudderless world.
Not sure if still the case but a lot of people used to post then set it to hidden after but not quick enough for people not to hit it.
Da fuck?
I don't care what's going on... it can be the apocalypse and this would still be fucking funny.
He's doing this just to rile up his base.
That might work in theory, but when you consider the curated nature of the content and the content these people go to. It wouldn't work.
I've been trying to explain to people that if you search for something on Google 9 times out of 10 you'll find it, regardless of any truth.
Double standards. Hypocrisy is for people who feel shame about it. These people feel no shame. Namely because double standards are the goal.
I love this. I don't know why I love it, but I love it.
None of this should surprise anyone at this point. We have a reality TV presidency run by a guy who treats reality like it's TV.
I love you too ya little shit.
This Mrs Nastassia Sablina sounds legit. You know, on account of being both a him and a Mrs. Can't argue with a fat wad of cash after all.
Cause he's an old fat fuck and letting gravity do the work of compressing your fat is easier than trying to suck it in? I guess?
Must... resist... Monica reference... ARRRGHHHHH
I very much wanted it to be what we all thought it was... but it wasn't. He is obviously tucking in his shirt. Hate the man, but don't lie.
This is especially true given how many lie or pretend to be something they're not to win. 2/2
I don't like the idea of representatives going off their personal beliefs. They are there to represent the voters not themselves. 1/
Rofl I forgot about the light up the ass
You may very well be right, but there aren't as many willing to go along with burning it to the ground as he and his supporters believe.
Procedurally he wouldn't have the power to do that without risking another civil war. This is gonna come down to Trump or America, not both.
This isn't a choose your own adventure situation. If both parties have a claim it either gets resolved or his term ends.
they went into service. Your argument is valid, his is not. He's just a lazy entitled coward who demands double standards in life. 3/3
made it very clear over the decades what his opinion on soldiers and war was. Going so far as to threaten disownment of his children if 2/
That's the difference. You're making an argument against the Vietnam war in general. Trump wouldn't serve in any capacity for any war and 1/
potentially remove Trump by force. Though it wouldn't be the "military" per se, it'd be US Marshals. 4/4
in The White House. Legally, constitutionally Pelosi would become President. They would have to follow her orders, including an order to 3/