21430 pts ยท January 18, 2015
I wasn't sure when you said "complaining about" whether it was a complaint for or against it.
You haven't met some of the folks I have. You'd be hard-pressed to convince them otherwise. Yet, they don't make the cannibal connection.
Since when was O'Neill in DBZ?
Fair point.
I dunno, but the thumbnail legit made me think this post contained a mouse.
Made me sad, too, bro.
http://www.ihateyou.com/
Well that's clearly a lie.
Damn right you are.
You still haven't convinced me you are who you say you are, meaning you're either still trying to troll me or you believe your own nonsense.
I get the message, buy a wifi scrambler. You sure know how to market hardware.
Oh, wow, wifi routers. Implying people don't use hardlines anymore.
Implying you think I'm even paying attention to your links anymore.
That's nice. If "they" don't already know, they're bad at their jobs. Or is this your way of conditioning society to destroy its own 'net?
Implying you think I don't google links that people drop instead.
Implying you think I'm going to click any link you drop.
Ok. Cool. Talk to me when you're six feet under and rotting in a box.
Your phrasing perplexes me, almost as much as your commitment to this charade.
Implying it will ever be okay to do any of that.
3) They would not poison either group by joining it, and they certainly wouldn't need to endanger their research by doing so.
2) Anyone claiming to have your resources would track experimental and control groups of people, and their responses to each other.
I'm not going to call you a friend no matter how much pretension you engage in. And you don't need to provoke people to do this "research".
Ad hominem! Lazy reasoning! 2am posts on imgur! Cats!
Are you a robot?
"I'm developing an algorithm that I think is psychic and to do it I'm going to say people are pretending to be psychics."
Oh I know. You're not talking about mind-reading, you're talking about reasoning. But that doesn't make you insightful.
You can't do that anyway, because you're poisoning the well with specious assumptions. You're studying argument, not behavior.
You're not even being selective. Every comment you make is designed to trigger aggression, not diagnose its cause.
If you were any kind of decent researcher you'd be making less scattered pokes at me to get information you don't already think you have.
You're confusing outcasts with recluses. Don't make me correct your word choice.
I wasn't sure when you said "complaining about" whether it was a complaint for or against it.
You haven't met some of the folks I have. You'd be hard-pressed to convince them otherwise. Yet, they don't make the cannibal connection.
Since when was O'Neill in DBZ?
Fair point.
I dunno, but the thumbnail legit made me think this post contained a mouse.
Made me sad, too, bro.
http://www.ihateyou.com/
Well that's clearly a lie.
Damn right you are.
You still haven't convinced me you are who you say you are, meaning you're either still trying to troll me or you believe your own nonsense.
I get the message, buy a wifi scrambler. You sure know how to market hardware.
Oh, wow, wifi routers. Implying people don't use hardlines anymore.
Implying you think I'm even paying attention to your links anymore.
That's nice. If "they" don't already know, they're bad at their jobs. Or is this your way of conditioning society to destroy its own 'net?
Implying you think I don't google links that people drop instead.
Implying you think I'm going to click any link you drop.
Ok. Cool. Talk to me when you're six feet under and rotting in a box.
Your phrasing perplexes me, almost as much as your commitment to this charade.
Implying it will ever be okay to do any of that.
3) They would not poison either group by joining it, and they certainly wouldn't need to endanger their research by doing so.
2) Anyone claiming to have your resources would track experimental and control groups of people, and their responses to each other.
I'm not going to call you a friend no matter how much pretension you engage in. And you don't need to provoke people to do this "research".
Ad hominem! Lazy reasoning! 2am posts on imgur! Cats!
Are you a robot?
"I'm developing an algorithm that I think is psychic and to do it I'm going to say people are pretending to be psychics."
Oh I know. You're not talking about mind-reading, you're talking about reasoning. But that doesn't make you insightful.
You can't do that anyway, because you're poisoning the well with specious assumptions. You're studying argument, not behavior.
You're not even being selective. Every comment you make is designed to trigger aggression, not diagnose its cause.
If you were any kind of decent researcher you'd be making less scattered pokes at me to get information you don't already think you have.
You're confusing outcasts with recluses. Don't make me correct your word choice.