87201 pts ยท April 10, 2012
I do science, and snark.
#15 science exists because I'm angry at things and want to prove people wrong systematically.
Fix this by replacing "doesn't" with "don't" and it works.
*sucks in air through teeth*. Yeaaaaaah, would kill him to put him out of his misery but you know... good old double stones from fire bush.
what about those 3 you used on the berserker and failed to kill, hmmm Legolas? HMMM?
He's dead? Oh sweet, I know how to use resurrection magic.
At this point I just actively avoid anything adorable like this.
there's a much better case for not doing that though
higher ed is still somewhat insulated in FL. Unfortunately, both the left and right are against academic freedom, so...
overlapping the center and green hoop: being a German sausage
dot
That man just doesn't give up, does he?
I mean, Picard was in Dune.
Also anecdotally, I would point out that college education requires no certs and does function adequately. But that's a separate issue.
E.g., programs like Teach for America or Engineers without Borders are popular, but stunted by this sorts of requirements.
are concerning, because the top performers often have better job prospects and can't be bothered to navigate the labyrinthine certs.
I'm not conflating college degrees with certification. And yes, technical classes in STEM generally = good. Patchwork state-by-state certs
Forbes, Stanford research, etc. Please see above in response to @driftwoodlamp.
K
Please see above in response to @driftwoodlamp.
pay is abysmal. So, certifications aren't always bad, but the current patchwork is confusing at best and may be actively harmful.
from teaching for a few years out of college (which many may do), if they don't intend to make a career out of it (which many don't) b/c
also referneces Murnane et al "Who Will Teach". The argument is basically: certifications are very varied, and discourage smart people
#15 science exists because I'm angry at things and want to prove people wrong systematically.
Fix this by replacing "doesn't" with "don't" and it works.
*sucks in air through teeth*. Yeaaaaaah, would kill him to put him out of his misery but you know... good old double stones from fire bush.
what about those 3 you used on the berserker and failed to kill, hmmm Legolas? HMMM?
He's dead? Oh sweet, I know how to use resurrection magic.
At this point I just actively avoid anything adorable like this.
there's a much better case for not doing that though
higher ed is still somewhat insulated in FL. Unfortunately, both the left and right are against academic freedom, so...
overlapping the center and green hoop: being a German sausage
dot
That man just doesn't give up, does he?
I mean, Picard was in Dune.
Also anecdotally, I would point out that college education requires no certs and does function adequately. But that's a separate issue.
E.g., programs like Teach for America or Engineers without Borders are popular, but stunted by this sorts of requirements.
are concerning, because the top performers often have better job prospects and can't be bothered to navigate the labyrinthine certs.
I'm not conflating college degrees with certification. And yes, technical classes in STEM generally = good. Patchwork state-by-state certs
Forbes, Stanford research, etc. Please see above in response to @driftwoodlamp.
K
Please see above in response to @driftwoodlamp.
Please see above in response to @driftwoodlamp.
pay is abysmal. So, certifications aren't always bad, but the current patchwork is confusing at best and may be actively harmful.
from teaching for a few years out of college (which many may do), if they don't intend to make a career out of it (which many don't) b/c
also referneces Murnane et al "Who Will Teach". The argument is basically: certifications are very varied, and discourage smart people