Shockwaves

31405 pts · July 31, 2013


I still watch them mainly for the viewpoints, as prominent figures is useful to know what so many agree with

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

taunt has a “or” sound and aunt has an “ah” sound for me in the south east

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So why should they be arrested if it’s not illegal? You can rally to change the laws but you can’t then retroactively arrest.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

the chairs they normally have cost $$$$$

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Surely your fight should be the laws sending women to jail for abortions, not controlling where men have consensual sex.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

surprise surprise is incredibly illegal.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I can’t even understand your argument here, the only way a man will cause a pregnancy by ejaculating where he shouldn’t is rape, which 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That’s stupid. You are stupid.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I never said they did

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I never claimed it was or wasn’t their property, let the courts decide.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Just because it’s a sidewalk doesn’t mean you’re allowed to be there.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

Then the counter argument is: is a 9 month old in the womb “the woman’s body”?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

curious, where do you draw the line

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

wasn’t the wrong house, but yes no knocks shouldn’t be a thing

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Also this “suspect was already in custody” narrative isn’t true either

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 15

supposedly the only one shooting 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

This is where my issue lies as well. Either the police or the boyfriend are lying because the boyfriend didn’t get hit once, and he was 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

What children? And have you looked into why it happened?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sometimes the person didn’t have any ill intent

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no case by case one size fits all rule to this. Context of each and every encounter matters, you can’t just say “hesitate” because

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

cases where it’s proven the police murdered someone.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

aren’t all that innocent. If police are aiming at you and you do anything other than what they say, it’s your own fault. Obviously excluding

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They’re only innocent if they DONT then shoot or injure the cop. If you’re in a situation where police have guns aimed at you, you likely

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It’s not reversed, you didn’t get tricked

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

to me this shows it’s clearly not reversed

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

That’s possibly the stupidest thing i’ve heard today

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don’t think anyone disagrees with that. Just some people have a funny idea of what “no reason” means.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

maybe he should invest in a reducer seat

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I feel like there’s a phrase out there somewhere... something about two wrongs...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3