513 pts · October 11, 2013
I 100% agree. But as soon as there is someone in the middle interpreting those results, a bias can be introduced.
As for the foil - i think if the current is low enough where it doesnt heat up it would just act as a crappy wire.
It would be like its already low on power. It might work but not as long as it would have with 3 batteries.
For example if they had the 3 batteries at 1.5v = 4.5v. Pretend device might work in the range of 2.5v-4.5v. If you use only 2 batteries
I would imagine if it used low current and whatever it is could run at the lower 3v instead of 4.5 - might work for a little while.
And that makes up half the nation?
No but i see the education system produced people that can’t make a valid point without greatly exaggerating imaginary statistics.
You must know very different teachers than I do. I would ask the same question of them - what makes them so qualified that we cant debate?
IMO educators have a better understanding of how to teach but I wouldn’t trust them to decide what to teach without input from parents
I 100% agree. But don’t see how that goes against what they said. It should be a collaboration imo.
Meh. I got my shot, but still wouldn’t 100% believe anything just because it was on TV.
In my opinion its just not the place for it.
Sorry gonna have to just disagree then. The same way I wouldnt want a boy to go to school with his junk out, i wouldnt want a girl to do it.
I could have probably told you the color of thong a few girls wore each day because their skirts were low and the thong would stick out.
Distracting - also yes.
Hell i can remember some girls with shirts cut so low you could see the bottom of their bra. Did I “control” myself - yes. Was it
Outside of a learning environment I 100% agree. But where the focus should be education, i dont see how a revealing outfit is appropriate.
So my thought wouldnt be a law so much as teaching more about the respect for life and firearm safety.
For food gave me a sense of the consequences of these actions. I think its beneficial to learn about the world in this way.
I fee has faded over time. At 10 years old i was hunting and shot my first deer. The understanding that I had killed this beautiful animal
Unfortunately I’m on the other side of the spectrum - I grew up around hunting - and feel that it taught safety and a respect for life that
To get a firearm id they also needed references for the background check. So other people must have vouched for them. How can we stop it
And for the record - im not against making it harder as long as someone defines it as something reasonable.
And what i want is a definition of “work for it”. I did the backround check that takes months. What is the mystery step that makes it safer?
I lock it because I would rather them have to work for it a little. I also lock up the guns - because it makes sense.
Ehh I mean we have a 18 year age limit. Not sure how the extra years will stop school shootings. Since by 18 you’re basically out of school.
Genuinely curious what the *slight* inconvenience would be that stops a school shooting?
Sorry shortened for char limit. I meant in middle school - high school
I 100% agree. But as soon as there is someone in the middle interpreting those results, a bias can be introduced.
As for the foil - i think if the current is low enough where it doesnt heat up it would just act as a crappy wire.
It would be like its already low on power. It might work but not as long as it would have with 3 batteries.
For example if they had the 3 batteries at 1.5v = 4.5v. Pretend device might work in the range of 2.5v-4.5v. If you use only 2 batteries
I would imagine if it used low current and whatever it is could run at the lower 3v instead of 4.5 - might work for a little while.
And that makes up half the nation?
No but i see the education system produced people that can’t make a valid point without greatly exaggerating imaginary statistics.
You must know very different teachers than I do. I would ask the same question of them - what makes them so qualified that we cant debate?
IMO educators have a better understanding of how to teach but I wouldn’t trust them to decide what to teach without input from parents
I 100% agree. But don’t see how that goes against what they said. It should be a collaboration imo.
Meh. I got my shot, but still wouldn’t 100% believe anything just because it was on TV.
In my opinion its just not the place for it.
Sorry gonna have to just disagree then. The same way I wouldnt want a boy to go to school with his junk out, i wouldnt want a girl to do it.
I could have probably told you the color of thong a few girls wore each day because their skirts were low and the thong would stick out.
Distracting - also yes.
Hell i can remember some girls with shirts cut so low you could see the bottom of their bra. Did I “control” myself - yes. Was it
Outside of a learning environment I 100% agree. But where the focus should be education, i dont see how a revealing outfit is appropriate.
So my thought wouldnt be a law so much as teaching more about the respect for life and firearm safety.
For food gave me a sense of the consequences of these actions. I think its beneficial to learn about the world in this way.
I fee has faded over time. At 10 years old i was hunting and shot my first deer. The understanding that I had killed this beautiful animal
Unfortunately I’m on the other side of the spectrum - I grew up around hunting - and feel that it taught safety and a respect for life that
To get a firearm id they also needed references for the background check. So other people must have vouched for them. How can we stop it
And for the record - im not against making it harder as long as someone defines it as something reasonable.
And what i want is a definition of “work for it”. I did the backround check that takes months. What is the mystery step that makes it safer?
I lock it because I would rather them have to work for it a little. I also lock up the guns - because it makes sense.
I lock it because I would rather them have to work for it a little. I also lock up the guns - because it makes sense.
Ehh I mean we have a 18 year age limit. Not sure how the extra years will stop school shootings. Since by 18 you’re basically out of school.
Genuinely curious what the *slight* inconvenience would be that stops a school shooting?
Sorry shortened for char limit. I meant in middle school - high school