10446 pts ยท June 16, 2015
Holy shit that is terrible. So besides there not being a database like that on federal level, even on state level that is not available.
You do have a simple system in place that if a person were convicted of such crimes he would never get into such a position again in the whole US right?
I think 45 didn't deny it.
Thanx
US population is 329 million. I know Trump is doing his best to bring that down, but he's not that far yet.
Any more? Asking for a friend :-)
Not unrelated. Just a compact prototype.
Yes, based on their training material and models.
Delays and a little bit of clean up are no costs. Destroying art, screen and computer facilities is.
They were destroying the building and its insides. Sorry but if you want to destroy things you can expect things to get nasty. This was not just a peaceful protest.
There's literal videos of them showing the destruction they are causing. Take your time going though that and keep on being in denial that these sweet young kids could cause those damages.
I don't have to give you a plan if you don't like a blockade or occupation without destroying property. But doing this doesn't chance the stance either and only puts those protestors in a bad light.
And what do you think the picture that is painted here was. Low life terrorist supporters destroying university property. So the added benefits were you could at least destroy some property and art, nice touch.
Maybe that cut-off amount is when the police asks you to leave multiple times.
Blockade a main road, take control of a faculty but don't destroy it. The impact and news attention will be just as high without having to destroy property.
I don't know why they choose to do other damages. Furniture, computers, screens, art, doors, and trying to bust a vault. Might be weird in your eyes but that's what they did.
So you suggest destroying a university building is the way forward to gain support.
You're taking about the money of the people of Amsterdam and of the Netherlands. Do you really think that money is spend on zylkon B?
I don't agree with them supporting that. But I also don't support destroying the inside of the building during a so called protest.
Regretfully that wouldn't have made much of a difference. They would have been back on the streets in the same amount of time.
Of course trying to be sarcastic about it helps. Totsl damages were a few million. The people of Amsterdam thank you for being so concerned and being an ass about it.
Then you also seen the videos of those people destroying the inside of the building. That has nothing to do with the political parties, that has everything to do with the willingness by these people to cause damages.
They literally destroyed the inside of the building and were caught on video doing that. That's no brainwash, those are facts.
While I consider a lot. These protestors destroyed the building they were protesting in and caused multi million dollar damages.
Not only that. The problem was when they started to destroy the building and caused a lot of damage.
Sure. It's of course okay forv those protestors to destroy a university building for a few million in damages?
Not if they start destroying the property.
This is a crowd that was demolishing the building.
After they asked them to leave a few times. When you then also mask up it's more difficult for the police to see the difference between good and bad protestors.
When those protestors start demolishing the building they are protesting in and masking up you might have to wonder if it's not needed to remove them by force.
Holy shit that is terrible. So besides there not being a database like that on federal level, even on state level that is not available.
You do have a simple system in place that if a person were convicted of such crimes he would never get into such a position again in the whole US right?
I think 45 didn't deny it.
Thanx
US population is 329 million. I know Trump is doing his best to bring that down, but he's not that far yet.
Any more? Asking for a friend :-)
Not unrelated. Just a compact prototype.
Yes, based on their training material and models.
Delays and a little bit of clean up are no costs. Destroying art, screen and computer facilities is.
They were destroying the building and its insides. Sorry but if you want to destroy things you can expect things to get nasty. This was not just a peaceful protest.
There's literal videos of them showing the destruction they are causing. Take your time going though that and keep on being in denial that these sweet young kids could cause those damages.
I don't have to give you a plan if you don't like a blockade or occupation without destroying property. But doing this doesn't chance the stance either and only puts those protestors in a bad light.
And what do you think the picture that is painted here was. Low life terrorist supporters destroying university property. So the added benefits were you could at least destroy some property and art, nice touch.
Maybe that cut-off amount is when the police asks you to leave multiple times.
Blockade a main road, take control of a faculty but don't destroy it. The impact and news attention will be just as high without having to destroy property.
I don't know why they choose to do other damages. Furniture, computers, screens, art, doors, and trying to bust a vault. Might be weird in your eyes but that's what they did.
So you suggest destroying a university building is the way forward to gain support.
You're taking about the money of the people of Amsterdam and of the Netherlands. Do you really think that money is spend on zylkon B?
I don't agree with them supporting that. But I also don't support destroying the inside of the building during a so called protest.
Regretfully that wouldn't have made much of a difference. They would have been back on the streets in the same amount of time.
Of course trying to be sarcastic about it helps. Totsl damages were a few million. The people of Amsterdam thank you for being so concerned and being an ass about it.
Then you also seen the videos of those people destroying the inside of the building. That has nothing to do with the political parties, that has everything to do with the willingness by these people to cause damages.
They literally destroyed the inside of the building and were caught on video doing that. That's no brainwash, those are facts.
While I consider a lot. These protestors destroyed the building they were protesting in and caused multi million dollar damages.
Not only that. The problem was when they started to destroy the building and caused a lot of damage.
Sure. It's of course okay forv those protestors to destroy a university building for a few million in damages?
Not if they start destroying the property.
This is a crowd that was demolishing the building.
After they asked them to leave a few times. When you then also mask up it's more difficult for the police to see the difference between good and bad protestors.
When those protestors start demolishing the building they are protesting in and masking up you might have to wonder if it's not needed to remove them by force.