4429 pts · August 27, 2018
Some people's idea of free speech is being able to attribute any speech freely to Winston Churchill.
Great! Thanks! https://youtu.be/BANgfLSMK2o?t=2429
Talking of him. Any of you remember that movie he removes his "fingerprint" with a knife (or something)? Just trying remember where I saw it
I'm a serious socialist and a worry about the "current climate". I have not read 1984 and I don't talk about it.
... and those who succeeded got deified
Apple and Google deciding what you can install on your phone. Oh, but at least it is not the government! Build your own phone if not happy!
They are not the first mob to attempt to occupy the capitol. They are the first one to succeed. (they also have the worse reason for it).
Yet, if they had been treated like BLM protesters, they would have failed and they would not be called terrorists or insurrectionists today.
The article claims something in the title, but it does not explain in the text. Might be true but we need explanations to judge information.
Lets mention Trump has been trying to reduce "big tech" influence. Banning him might be legitimate, but there is a conflict of interest.
Trump and his supporters are not the only thing to worry about.
Accept to be tracked by "big tech" or have to send letters to your friends by mail. Isn't the proof "big tech" has too much influence?
These companies track everything you do on the internet and are fighting each other for more power. Not your friend's message board.
It is Twitter and Facebook who are supposed to arbitrary decide who is committing a crime, and not the law from your elected government?
So you guys think private companies should not submit to the will of the government submitted to people's will?
Why does it matters when it is your properly elected government, but not when it is those powerful private companies who own the Internet?
So.... "free speech" does not apply to the Internet because it is owned by private companies?
Never tried it. Sounds like FB, but no ads, no selling of your data, no tracking, and no moderation of content. Obviously a place for racism
Lets imagine a future wannabe tyrant wants to prevent opposition.
I don't think so. It could be used against future legitimate candidates. People should be able to vote for whoever they want.
Family are more important than power plays and divergent opinions. Talking and loving are the solution to this bullshit division.
Meanwhile Trump opponents are called "traitors". Calling each other names is counterproductive.People need to talk and understand each other
I do when all this hair in my face gets annoying
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/uniprix-black-hair-products-non-essential-1.5858636
Who's been fighting police and government for years. Who charged the capitol and killed a police officer. I think this story is very ironic.
Look all these people who attacked police officers for months now being outraged by opposite protester group doing the same.
You would be applauding if those were anti-trump protestors, and they would be calling you terrorists. You're just the opposite fanatics.
you stranger have no teeth?
There's a whole popular TV serie about how children are asses to each other. it is called South Park. It reminds me of elementary school.
i was waiting to see how she would turn her hair in blond in the middle :(
Some people's idea of free speech is being able to attribute any speech freely to Winston Churchill.
Great! Thanks! https://youtu.be/BANgfLSMK2o?t=2429
Talking of him. Any of you remember that movie he removes his "fingerprint" with a knife (or something)? Just trying remember where I saw it
I'm a serious socialist and a worry about the "current climate". I have not read 1984 and I don't talk about it.
... and those who succeeded got deified
Apple and Google deciding what you can install on your phone. Oh, but at least it is not the government! Build your own phone if not happy!
They are not the first mob to attempt to occupy the capitol. They are the first one to succeed. (they also have the worse reason for it).
Yet, if they had been treated like BLM protesters, they would have failed and they would not be called terrorists or insurrectionists today.
The article claims something in the title, but it does not explain in the text. Might be true but we need explanations to judge information.
Lets mention Trump has been trying to reduce "big tech" influence. Banning him might be legitimate, but there is a conflict of interest.
Trump and his supporters are not the only thing to worry about.
Accept to be tracked by "big tech" or have to send letters to your friends by mail. Isn't the proof "big tech" has too much influence?
These companies track everything you do on the internet and are fighting each other for more power. Not your friend's message board.
It is Twitter and Facebook who are supposed to arbitrary decide who is committing a crime, and not the law from your elected government?
So you guys think private companies should not submit to the will of the government submitted to people's will?
Why does it matters when it is your properly elected government, but not when it is those powerful private companies who own the Internet?
So.... "free speech" does not apply to the Internet because it is owned by private companies?
Never tried it. Sounds like FB, but no ads, no selling of your data, no tracking, and no moderation of content. Obviously a place for racism
Lets imagine a future wannabe tyrant wants to prevent opposition.
I don't think so. It could be used against future legitimate candidates. People should be able to vote for whoever they want.
Family are more important than power plays and divergent opinions. Talking and loving are the solution to this bullshit division.
Meanwhile Trump opponents are called "traitors". Calling each other names is counterproductive.People need to talk and understand each other
I do when all this hair in my face gets annoying
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/uniprix-black-hair-products-non-essential-1.5858636
Who's been fighting police and government for years. Who charged the capitol and killed a police officer. I think this story is very ironic.
Look all these people who attacked police officers for months now being outraged by opposite protester group doing the same.
You would be applauding if those were anti-trump protestors, and they would be calling you terrorists. You're just the opposite fanatics.
you stranger have no teeth?
There's a whole popular TV serie about how children are asses to each other. it is called South Park. It reminds me of elementary school.
i was waiting to see how she would turn her hair in blond in the middle :(