5'8, brown hair/eyes, cisgender male, average in most specs while being anything but. Hated by left-wingers and right-wingers and that's fine by me. I've taken the unpopular opinion in many cases, and time has proven me correct. If I had a dollar for every insult I've garnered in the past decade and a half about the elite pedophile ring in government, I wouldn't need to work. WATCH OUT FOR PROPAGANDA, IT'S EVERYWHERE AND DESIGNED TO PIT LEFT VS RIGHT WHEN THAT'S NOT THE FIGHT. Science and spirituality can coexist in beauty when the filth and disease of religious dogma is removed. The projections of past trauma deeply contribute to cognitive dissonance.
That's the point of Romeo & Juliet clauses in progressive states.
Some sources claim 2-10%, but studies show it to be 2-6% in Europe and America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape
2-6% are false rape, and only 35% of cases get reported, and only a quarter of those cases are closed.
Any person who can actually read will notice that I said this applies to any child, but good job getting outraged over imaginary bullshit
I stopped giving any fucks after that
Does looking though just my comment history include where I get called a bigoted boy rapist?
Or, maybe, you guys are projecting that onto me. What a surprise!
People are unconscious to how pervasive this is in the system and too arrogant to realize they are brainwashed to defend it.
I realized the problem. I can remember how many programs have used this exact phrasing when most people cant seem to remember last month.
No, it doesn't if you have any actual common sensibility. It really just shows how many broken, stupid, fucked up braindead people are here.
Literally that celebrities, politicians, wealth, and public officials can rape a child and use this phrasing to dodge blame.
THANK YOU FOR FUCKS SAKE, ITS NOT THAT COMPLICATED. 400 comments of people who argue about bullshit.
Because people are splitting hairs about pedophilia and intentionally dodging the point of the post to argue about their delusional bullshit
That's a crock of shit, because rapists and pedophiles get off scot free in a significant amount of cases because of prejudice for abusers.
No, you're not. If you actually believe that, then you're retarded. I'm just going to go ahead and assume you're a troll and mute you.
I had one guy who, in one comment called me a bigoted boy rapist, then in another said that the premise of this post was wrong.
OLD PEOPLE PREDATING ON CHILDREN SHOULDN'T HAVE IT CALLED "SEX WITH UNDERAGE CHILD" WHEN THE CHILD IS UNABLE TO CONSENT.
childrenofthedigitalage.org/a-handbook-for-paedophiles-goes-online/?fbclid=IwAR0-pZoY2xTTJKdp6SeA_0Uzr9VaA_DB146Q3wn8AVlvg-NBiOEuaLb_kr0
For fucks sake, it's not complicated and its a serious issue that you are dodging the point of to purport your own bullshit.
It's not, there are legal loopholes used that protect rapists from being recognized as rapists and that's what this post addresses.
How does 98% of the community understand it's not applying to childhood exploration, but only a select few arguing against it vehemently
And considering how many people know exactly what it means, it's showing how many people are fucked in the head trying to defend child rape.
Most states you can with parental permission
Yea, it really is. People living in reality know this. Do you know why Brock Turner was given less than 3 months of jail time?
Yes, because the law should reflect the predatory nature of abusers and manipulators who use their privilege to escape legal prosecution.
So you know how common this phrasing can be, especially in court terminology?
Yea, I'm pretty much done with people who can barely hide their pedophile tendencies to argue about bullshit.
Not if you have moneyyyyyyyyyy
No, it's talking about terminology used in rape cases that excuse pedophiles from the villainy of their actions present in many rape cases.
Sounds like a problem with the same court system that this post is arguing against.