2883 pts · January 22, 2016
Lol ready at any time to inject US domestic politics into other nation's affairs
Yep
Thats how they became rivals
German here. Never heard that translation. Usually fairytale ="Märchen"
Why so rude? Also re your argument: you claim I "defend him" - i dont hence my last comment.
Ok, got'cha. Yeah its kinda an odd legal peculiarity given that its technically a "chemical weapon" causing unnecessary suffering
Its not a War Crime given that America is not in a state of armed conflict which International law requires - source: I study Int. Law
I'm not american and couldn't care less about supporting or defending trump
Holy fuck. He couldn't use the term "Gassed" more broadly. Jewish Genocide in GAS CHAMBERS is not the same as riot gas. Wtf
True - I inferred. However race wasn't a topic -only religion. It was the only sequitur. Hence, reasonable to infer it as your implication.
Uhh why?
The post did. And you linked downvotes to racism. "Racism against muslims" is the inference.
I'm downvoting since I'm a european and dislike the amount of american politics on imgur - esp thr polarizing kind.
Muslims arent a race, the same way Catholics arent.
True, my bad. However the same logic still applies. Just cause there is no mention of X doesn't prove X is less important.
Lol np :)
Sorry, I don't understand. :D
If you wanna know more you can dm me :) Also Article 7 of the ICC Statute defines CAH well. Facunating stuff.
In VERY short, the evidence you list, and the general evidence from the US doesn't conform to what Int. Law defines as CAH.
Also, no - I'm not from the US. MY Arguments are based on International law, evidence from satalites and witness evidence (2)
Oh haha, misunderstanding. I know you werent trying to argue - just had to be short because of word limit. Thanks for your interest :) (1)
2 things: 1) do you have any academic sources claiming CAH in the US? 2) Geneva conventions dont apply because there is no state of war.
If you have any questions, you can always dm me. I'd be happy to chat and share what I know :)
Yeah, also facinating. Thanks for your interest, it meas a lot. Also - funny username :D
I refered to Article 6 of the "ICC Statute" for Genocide and Article 7 for CAH as well as caselaw. Facinating stuff.
YES! and Rwanda.
np :) idk about "pushing conrona conpiracies". But controlling telecommunication technology is def. happenig. I wouldnt be supprised re 5G
Lol ready at any time to inject US domestic politics into other nation's affairs
Yep
Thats how they became rivals
German here. Never heard that translation. Usually fairytale ="Märchen"
Why so rude? Also re your argument: you claim I "defend him" - i dont hence my last comment.
Ok, got'cha. Yeah its kinda an odd legal peculiarity given that its technically a "chemical weapon" causing unnecessary suffering
Its not a War Crime given that America is not in a state of armed conflict which International law requires - source: I study Int. Law
I'm not american and couldn't care less about supporting or defending trump
Holy fuck. He couldn't use the term "Gassed" more broadly. Jewish Genocide in GAS CHAMBERS is not the same as riot gas. Wtf
True - I inferred. However race wasn't a topic -only religion. It was the only sequitur. Hence, reasonable to infer it as your implication.
Uhh why?
The post did. And you linked downvotes to racism. "Racism against muslims" is the inference.
I'm downvoting since I'm a european and dislike the amount of american politics on imgur - esp thr polarizing kind.
Muslims arent a race, the same way Catholics arent.
True, my bad. However the same logic still applies. Just cause there is no mention of X doesn't prove X is less important.
Lol np :)
Sorry, I don't understand. :D
If you wanna know more you can dm me :) Also Article 7 of the ICC Statute defines CAH well. Facunating stuff.
In VERY short, the evidence you list, and the general evidence from the US doesn't conform to what Int. Law defines as CAH.
Also, no - I'm not from the US. MY Arguments are based on International law, evidence from satalites and witness evidence (2)
Oh haha, misunderstanding. I know you werent trying to argue - just had to be short because of word limit. Thanks for your interest :) (1)
2 things: 1) do you have any academic sources claiming CAH in the US? 2) Geneva conventions dont apply because there is no state of war.
If you have any questions, you can always dm me. I'd be happy to chat and share what I know :)
Yeah, also facinating. Thanks for your interest, it meas a lot. Also - funny username :D
I refered to Article 6 of the "ICC Statute" for Genocide and Article 7 for CAH as well as caselaw. Facinating stuff.
YES! and Rwanda.
np :) idk about "pushing conrona conpiracies". But controlling telecommunication technology is def. happenig. I wouldnt be supprised re 5G