89719 pts ยท September 13, 2012
Not really Satan. Kind of.
The US spends about eleventy hundred percent on education than it does on military.
who would want to go back to a pre-reagan era where we had money to build libraries and roads and go to the moon.
it looks like the police are making cuts themselves. getting rid of a lot of people who aren't committed to public safety, saving millions.
was that when the republicans agreed to do an investigation on jan 6th?
nope. instead we elected our captors. they wanted to allow laws and policies to be bought, and we voted them in.
because in america, we dont want our citizens to succeed. only the rich.
but we give all those resources and money to our military instead of helping our citizens
it's not hypocrisy when they're arguing for rights other ppl have
but then it'd be wrong
where are you getting this information about CRT? CRT appears to be more about bringing the conversation to the table than a solution.
but not the sale of prisoners of war as slaves to europeans. that started with the trade of guns to help them capture more people faster.
oh, so making up for things our country did in the past that affect people today shouldn't be taught?
where on earth did you find that Britain tried to kill off slavery entirely?
europeans provided the black warlords with guns that they didn't have previously, and traded the guns for the warlords POWs we then enslaved
i must have misread. my apologies.
so if CRT isn't about teaching history, what is it going to teach?
correct. but in america, it was white people of European ancestry enslaving black and dark skinned people of African ancestry.
colour and race were important aspects to why it existed and what perpetuated it
because some ppl think slavery&holocaust=untrue or good
which happened many times. captains would take on more slaves to account for the ones that wouldn't survive the voyage, or to make extra $$$
so you suggest NOT learning about slavery?
The US spends about eleventy hundred percent on education than it does on military.
who would want to go back to a pre-reagan era where we had money to build libraries and roads and go to the moon.
it looks like the police are making cuts themselves. getting rid of a lot of people who aren't committed to public safety, saving millions.
was that when the republicans agreed to do an investigation on jan 6th?
nope. instead we elected our captors. they wanted to allow laws and policies to be bought, and we voted them in.
because in america, we dont want our citizens to succeed. only the rich.
but we give all those resources and money to our military instead of helping our citizens
it's not hypocrisy when they're arguing for rights other ppl have
but then it'd be wrong
where are you getting this information about CRT? CRT appears to be more about bringing the conversation to the table than a solution.
but not the sale of prisoners of war as slaves to europeans. that started with the trade of guns to help them capture more people faster.
oh, so making up for things our country did in the past that affect people today shouldn't be taught?
where on earth did you find that Britain tried to kill off slavery entirely?
europeans provided the black warlords with guns that they didn't have previously, and traded the guns for the warlords POWs we then enslaved
i must have misread. my apologies.
so if CRT isn't about teaching history, what is it going to teach?
correct. but in america, it was white people of European ancestry enslaving black and dark skinned people of African ancestry.
colour and race were important aspects to why it existed and what perpetuated it
because some ppl think slavery&holocaust=untrue or good
which happened many times. captains would take on more slaves to account for the ones that wouldn't survive the voyage, or to make extra $$$
so you suggest NOT learning about slavery?