576 pts ยท September 28, 2012
Realistically the answer is likely that they found a videos downvotes had very little or no impact on peoples engagement with the video, at which point its just an extra little bit of data in every video that only costs them money at no gain.
Bunch of people fit the description, but of readily available youtube fame, Toby Seger from Storror fits the bill.
Woosh
No no the kids these days are definitely still saying yolo. :p
You say that like theres a gaggle of people with that income. But yes if the majority of people with that income arent at some point in their life billionaires they are idiots its very simple math.
So if you have modest cost of living you can also very realistically be a millionaire for retirement with 70k. But its not a fair comparison because the cost of living requirements dont need to scale with income. The 7.5m can luxuriously save 800k/mo while the 70k income will need to be budgeting well and make sacrifices to save 800/mo.
It actually doesnt. Being a billionaire with that income is very very easily achieved through simple investments. Nevermind the access to higher return sources that having that kind of capital affords.
While many answers above are correct, another aspect is most of the western nations in the graphic have very little to no impact, or interest in the region. This makes the backing of a ceasefire largely a domestic politics issue, in which in almost all cases calling for peace is viewed favorably against backing a war.
Functionally impossible. The level of shared research, effort and technique development that its taken to get here is far above the potential of an individual savant. Its kinda like imagining a modern nobel prize winner whose never had access to any prior research. Its conceivable but not realistically possible.
While certainly there will be games that try this, player generated dialog would be a huge step backward for most players. Novel for a time for sure. But people en mass are terrible at responding to ques with interesting answers on general topics and written or generated dialog will likely never be replaced by "say what you want" style worlds.
4.0 was by far the most combat oriented. Completely unplayable without a board and had very sparse rules for anything out of combat (I love 4 the most but its critics arent wrong). But ya 5 is a reaction to the negative reception of 4 for sure, still a crunchy enough game to get people engaged but nothing close to the games origins. But thats good, number crunching is a niche element of the hobby its good the flagship game is more broadly accessible.
To be clear there is nothing wrong with 5e or story games, they just arent built to keep min maxers satisfied which ends up with them being disruptive to a non crunchy party.
Pretty sure OP is playing Pathfinder they will be fine. Aversion to stat crunching is a 5e and story game thing usually.
While the souls games do a good job with that stuff we all get different things from games. If it were up to me Id remove all cutscenes dialogue and characterization from all games. "Immersive" and storytelling elements do nothing for me. Let me engage with the games mechanics and stop wasting my time getting there. Souls does a great job of this by leaving it in visual storytelling and item text. Thats why its awesome we all have different stuff to play that suits our takeaways from the medium.
Makes it fully impossible. You either make pieces that didnt exist on the rubiks cube prior, or more complicated make pieces that cant be properly oriented. If you swap three or more sticker some combinations of swaps become solvable.
Brains truly are a mysterious thing :p
I have an interesting twist on the opposite, where I can visualize things very easily, but cant to save my life place myself, senses, feelings etc into those visualizations. This includes my memories which I have but from the point of view of a camera floating in the distance. I also recently learned that people have memories in first person.
As a fellow fat, I let the house sit around 50-55 all winter and its glorious!
Also really importantly, when you dont get a practical effect right the result is it being a little lack luster, or at worst off tone. When cgi goes bad it looks unnatural which is way more jarring.
Please ignore the significantly greater impact an extra brick would have had in comparison to this book
A possible answer is that while the content of the wokeness is similar, the length any given topic is on your screen has lengthened. Back in the adventure a day format any given social issue had like at max 2 episodes of screen time, where now if you are sensitive to 1 social issue or another its with you for the whole season usually.
I dont think anything, and itd be cool if theres sufficient evidence for a prosecutor to press charges. But the police make a judgement call if it makes sense to hold the people and in this case they didnt. Dont know where in my reply an opinion was found but there certainly wasnt one.
Brandishing isnt illegal in kentucky, and I havent seen the specifics of this incident but depending on the actions following this may not have rose to kentuckys standards to be a criminal offence through menacing or endgangerment.
While that may be true of some comic storylines, of this film it certainly is not.
You want to bring the sauce together in the pan with the noodles to add some of the starch from the pasta water to emulsify the sauce, and have it really adhere to the noodles. You can do the elements separately of course, but its easier to do well in a single pan.
The mentality in this instance is the same reason home depot employees arent supposed to provide repair advice anymore, in that providing "expert opinion" can make them liable to litigation in the case that the receiver causes an incident. Mind you its still a shitty mentality, just a different one.
But those people are using it. A big benefit of high framerates is controls. Past 60 the improvements in visual clarity are diminishing.
Its a chain whose gimmick is you can walk into the store and get a hot pizza in 2 mins. Low quality but its reliable in a pinch and cheap.
Roku has a channel that is just 24/7 baywatch
This is untrue. They would state lethal force can be an appropriate preventative measure for threat to property in some circumstances.
Realistically the answer is likely that they found a videos downvotes had very little or no impact on peoples engagement with the video, at which point its just an extra little bit of data in every video that only costs them money at no gain.
Bunch of people fit the description, but of readily available youtube fame, Toby Seger from Storror fits the bill.
Woosh
No no the kids these days are definitely still saying yolo. :p
You say that like theres a gaggle of people with that income. But yes if the majority of people with that income arent at some point in their life billionaires they are idiots its very simple math.
So if you have modest cost of living you can also very realistically be a millionaire for retirement with 70k. But its not a fair comparison because the cost of living requirements dont need to scale with income. The 7.5m can luxuriously save 800k/mo while the 70k income will need to be budgeting well and make sacrifices to save 800/mo.
It actually doesnt. Being a billionaire with that income is very very easily achieved through simple investments. Nevermind the access to higher return sources that having that kind of capital affords.
While many answers above are correct, another aspect is most of the western nations in the graphic have very little to no impact, or interest in the region. This makes the backing of a ceasefire largely a domestic politics issue, in which in almost all cases calling for peace is viewed favorably against backing a war.
Functionally impossible. The level of shared research, effort and technique development that its taken to get here is far above the potential of an individual savant. Its kinda like imagining a modern nobel prize winner whose never had access to any prior research. Its conceivable but not realistically possible.
While certainly there will be games that try this, player generated dialog would be a huge step backward for most players. Novel for a time for sure. But people en mass are terrible at responding to ques with interesting answers on general topics and written or generated dialog will likely never be replaced by "say what you want" style worlds.
4.0 was by far the most combat oriented. Completely unplayable without a board and had very sparse rules for anything out of combat (I love 4 the most but its critics arent wrong). But ya 5 is a reaction to the negative reception of 4 for sure, still a crunchy enough game to get people engaged but nothing close to the games origins. But thats good, number crunching is a niche element of the hobby its good the flagship game is more broadly accessible.
To be clear there is nothing wrong with 5e or story games, they just arent built to keep min maxers satisfied which ends up with them being disruptive to a non crunchy party.
Pretty sure OP is playing Pathfinder they will be fine. Aversion to stat crunching is a 5e and story game thing usually.
While the souls games do a good job with that stuff we all get different things from games. If it were up to me Id remove all cutscenes dialogue and characterization from all games. "Immersive" and storytelling elements do nothing for me. Let me engage with the games mechanics and stop wasting my time getting there. Souls does a great job of this by leaving it in visual storytelling and item text. Thats why its awesome we all have different stuff to play that suits our takeaways from the medium.
Makes it fully impossible. You either make pieces that didnt exist on the rubiks cube prior, or more complicated make pieces that cant be properly oriented. If you swap three or more sticker some combinations of swaps become solvable.
Brains truly are a mysterious thing :p
I have an interesting twist on the opposite, where I can visualize things very easily, but cant to save my life place myself, senses, feelings etc into those visualizations. This includes my memories which I have but from the point of view of a camera floating in the distance. I also recently learned that people have memories in first person.
As a fellow fat, I let the house sit around 50-55 all winter and its glorious!
Also really importantly, when you dont get a practical effect right the result is it being a little lack luster, or at worst off tone. When cgi goes bad it looks unnatural which is way more jarring.
Please ignore the significantly greater impact an extra brick would have had in comparison to this book
A possible answer is that while the content of the wokeness is similar, the length any given topic is on your screen has lengthened. Back in the adventure a day format any given social issue had like at max 2 episodes of screen time, where now if you are sensitive to 1 social issue or another its with you for the whole season usually.
I dont think anything, and itd be cool if theres sufficient evidence for a prosecutor to press charges. But the police make a judgement call if it makes sense to hold the people and in this case they didnt. Dont know where in my reply an opinion was found but there certainly wasnt one.
Brandishing isnt illegal in kentucky, and I havent seen the specifics of this incident but depending on the actions following this may not have rose to kentuckys standards to be a criminal offence through menacing or endgangerment.
While that may be true of some comic storylines, of this film it certainly is not.
You want to bring the sauce together in the pan with the noodles to add some of the starch from the pasta water to emulsify the sauce, and have it really adhere to the noodles. You can do the elements separately of course, but its easier to do well in a single pan.
The mentality in this instance is the same reason home depot employees arent supposed to provide repair advice anymore, in that providing "expert opinion" can make them liable to litigation in the case that the receiver causes an incident. Mind you its still a shitty mentality, just a different one.
But those people are using it. A big benefit of high framerates is controls. Past 60 the improvements in visual clarity are diminishing.
Its a chain whose gimmick is you can walk into the store and get a hot pizza in 2 mins. Low quality but its reliable in a pinch and cheap.
Roku has a channel that is just 24/7 baywatch
This is untrue. They would state lethal force can be an appropriate preventative measure for threat to property in some circumstances.