1538 pts ยท December 26, 2018
Enjoying the site and the imaginary points. Not enjoying the bs shadowban on my imgur messages.
Future pro wrestler lol
I also choose that guy's wife.
She still fishing for em? :P
?noredirect (the insanity wolf post not dickpics)
?noredirect
:P
https://imgur.com/7wPOQEn
claim, it doesn't. *shrug*/5
could debate on whether it's mere correlation or causation and which direction if so, but as far as proving or disproving the broader /4
I mean, the stat you suggested could be useful to explain why specifically the group broadly has a high rate, and then people of course/3
to invalidate broad claims about the rate./2
Not sure about that last part. Technically those possible other factors being more or less prevalent in that community doesn't seem /1
transwomen./2
Idk the stats, but be sure the stats you're looking at are the most relevant ones. That is, the rate relative to the population of the /1
losses is a poor indicator of objective skill at a given competition. /8
undefeated amateur is better than even an average pro. If the level of competition is vastly different, then simply looking at wins and/7
age or w/e. But when it comes to a comparison between two weight classes, or skill levels, or w/e, I think it would be silly to say some/6
cite it. I don't have an issue with boxing having weightclasses, or soccer having different leagues based on w/e they want, gender, skill/5
there are* facts that undermine those claims. If you or anyone has some evidence that suggests otherwise, they are more than welcome to /4
at the sport of soccer than the men's team. And further, the idea that anyone who disagrees with that claim must be sexist. I think are /3
And no, I don't hate the sport of boxing. Everything I've said has been specifically addressing the idea that the women's team is better/2
I hope you apply more rigor to your scientific research. Not once did I comment on the amount of attention either team should receive. /1
of comparing their results in their separate and totally different gendered leagues. Those are 2 different discussions. /5
history, and the examples of exhibition matches between female pro teams vs teenage male teams, and comparing them based on that instead /4
make them sexist. It most likely means they are looking at a plethora of data about athletic differences between men and women through /3
Future pro wrestler lol
I also choose that guy's wife.
She still fishing for em? :P
:P
https://imgur.com/7wPOQEn
claim, it doesn't. *shrug*/5
could debate on whether it's mere correlation or causation and which direction if so, but as far as proving or disproving the broader /4
I mean, the stat you suggested could be useful to explain why specifically the group broadly has a high rate, and then people of course/3
to invalidate broad claims about the rate./2
Not sure about that last part. Technically those possible other factors being more or less prevalent in that community doesn't seem /1
transwomen./2
Idk the stats, but be sure the stats you're looking at are the most relevant ones. That is, the rate relative to the population of the /1
losses is a poor indicator of objective skill at a given competition. /8
undefeated amateur is better than even an average pro. If the level of competition is vastly different, then simply looking at wins and/7
age or w/e. But when it comes to a comparison between two weight classes, or skill levels, or w/e, I think it would be silly to say some/6
cite it. I don't have an issue with boxing having weightclasses, or soccer having different leagues based on w/e they want, gender, skill/5
there are* facts that undermine those claims. If you or anyone has some evidence that suggests otherwise, they are more than welcome to /4
at the sport of soccer than the men's team. And further, the idea that anyone who disagrees with that claim must be sexist. I think are /3
And no, I don't hate the sport of boxing. Everything I've said has been specifically addressing the idea that the women's team is better/2
I hope you apply more rigor to your scientific research. Not once did I comment on the amount of attention either team should receive. /1
of comparing their results in their separate and totally different gendered leagues. Those are 2 different discussions. /5
history, and the examples of exhibition matches between female pro teams vs teenage male teams, and comparing them based on that instead /4
make them sexist. It most likely means they are looking at a plethora of data about athletic differences between men and women through /3