Imgur's original heavy handed proponent of queer rights and other PC bullshit. I'm the male version of a feminist killjoy--but I'm smarter and funnier than you are. ;)
Imgur's original heavy handed proponent of queer rights and other PC bullshit. I'm the male version of a feminist killjoy--but I'm smarter and funnier than you are. ;)
*checks date* I'll allow it.
Correct
me I should bash his face in just to be sure. I wouldn't want to be naive... /2
I'm pretty sure my little bro could kick that chick's ass and I can hold him down with one hand. I guess next time he starts a fight with 1/
superior understanding of violence stop me from being charged? No? Then fuck that cop.
So if a drunk woman slaps me pathetically at a bar and I immediately knock her out cold and she gets post concussion syndrome will your 1/
SOMEBODY ANSWER THIS
FYI It's a panda and she's saying "panda clap". You can find them on eBay or Amazon.
Humans really don't deserve dogs.
Thought it was this guy:
Fuck the Habs eh?
Hug yr mum.
Awkwars
https://pics.me.me/him-what-about-tacos-me-gets-horny-in-spanish-25221955.png
Haha I just googled "brittany big brother gif" one time looking for this one and was amazed by how many other ones came up.
There are like a million great gifs of her.
What? What is it? I want to know but I'm at work. Please describe.
I'm guessing everyone who would use VMs for this is used to just keeping their mouths shut in public forums...
We're just there looking for obscure vinyl.
And I say no it's not, it's 2 you're dumb at math, it's not an ad hominem fallacy, it's just a rude logically coherent statement.
an argument can't be both logically conherent AND insulting so long as my point doesn't rest on attacking your character. If you say 1+1=3
out of place and seemingly only loosely understood. I just phrased is as an insult because I'm trolling, but there's no reason 2/
a) I was making a trolling joke on the internet, but b) it's not actually ad hominem to claim that your usage of the subj/obj binary is 1/
...also if you think there's such a thing as objective authorial intent, the last 200 years of theory/phil is going to be a major plot twist
fallacies are more properly relevant to formal arguments/axiomatic logic--not so much a reading of song lyrics.
and applying fallacies to obviously subjective commentary is pointless. Subj/obj opposition is relevant to metaphysics and formal 2/
It was in insult, of course it's ad hominem. But also accurate. Subj/obj only has the loosest possible bearing on the discussion 1/
Guys, it's fine. He learned like three things in 1st year PHIL and he's trying to understand the whole world through that lens.
Did you just grab this from the front page and repost it here? C'mon.
oh, you mean my groin then.