http://imgur.com/dFMh2l3 http://imgur.com/0AgqkAi.jpg http://imgur.com/QTTnvBx.jpg http://imgur.com/GSZQPLy : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : If a grainy-ass, potato-camera screenshot of this ever makes it to the frontpage with a mouseover of my selfie, guess what? You already got all the fucking reward you deserve. You're looking at that majestic beard. Bask in the majesty of those selfies. Take a minute and drink that beauty in. Let the glory of it wash over you. And yes, the last pic of me is a nude. You're welcome.
Hitler only had 1 ball. This could work.
Doesn't everyone? O.o
I would condemn the one that started it, whether is was Spencer or someone from AntiFa.
I just think that violence is a resort only justifiable in self defense.
The fact that you consider men to somehow be a monolithic group in control is fascinating.
I don't warble about "colonialism". Never have, actually.
And attitudes like "white people can't experience racism" and men can't experience sexism" are rampant amongst such so-called liberals.
"Colonialist" use as a pejorative is absolutely a term that's slung by so-called liberals at white people.
Do you see a pattern here? MRAs and non-feminists are not attempting to no-platform anyone, while feminists are. Why is that?
Which groups attempted to stifle the production and viewing of an opposing viewpoint? It wasn't MRAs and non-feminists.
And yet, which groups got media coverage? It wasn't the MRAs and non-feminists.
And yet, they were petitioning against a movie they hadn't seen, and misrepresenting it entirely.
That's a tiny group, and they cost him ~$100,000 and his job.
You mean groups of 3 feminists that charged a man for harassment and tied him up in court for 3 years, for disagreeing on twitter?
And yet, I'm certain you've pointed at Paul Elam or similar folks and declared that he speaks for all non-feminists.
The fact that ANY action was taken to stifle debate doesn't concern you in the least, does it?
I'm not an MRA, and none of what I'm mentioning is surprising, or difficult to discover.
Both because he's not an MRA, and because MRAs don't endorse rape.
And those that do constantly point at his article about "rape on private property" as indicative of MA attitudes. It is not.
I'm also quite certain the police were intrigued by her, when investigating the false fire alarm at a protest she participated in.
There are no end of feminists that claim that Roosh is an MRA, for one thing.
Roosh V isn't an MRA. That doesn't have anything to do with Chanty Binx being an asshole AND a feminist. A vocal one.
http://heatst.com/world/the-red-pill-the-movie-feminists-tried-to-ban-gets-uk-premier-on-international-mens-day/
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/oct/26/the-red-pill-melbourne-cinema-drops-mens-rights-film-after-feminist-backlash
Still waiting for that answer. http://giphy.com/gifs/eating-deer-K9b2WiPZi0ZjO
If no identifying information is included, how would anyone be able to act against the person pictured?
Still waiting on an answer to the actual question I asked.
You mean "a video where she sang 'Cry me a river', when asked about her compassion for male suicide victims"?