41193 pts ยท June 15, 2019
From UK. I'm happy to talk to anyone whether they agree with me or not. I however come on imgur for entertainment and a bit of debate. I don't think others being abusive should be tolerated.
But, according to imgur, it's ok if I fat shame and not consider what a person's been through....
you're asking for respect? 5/5
responded by saying it's ok for you to stare in a particular situation (porn interview). Which ignores the entire discussion. And yet 4/5
what I said by giving a biological argument which clearly doesn't determine people's behaviour and ignored what I'd said. You then 3/4
responding to the idea that clothing gives permission to everyone to stare. I argued that this is not a universal rule. You challenged 2/3
Don't think you're following the conversation. Which is what's really annoying on imgur. People just respond to the last msg. I was 1/2
stare and whether it's right or wrong to stare. 2/2
But you know that underage kids do wear inappropriate clothes? The question is whether those clothes give permission to everyone to 1/2
how can these principles have any persuasion? 4/4
strong arguments for it being ok for everyone to stare at cleavage no matter what. But if I can't use examples to test principles then 3/4
stare for all and 2. It's never wrong to stare, then I'll have shown that the rules argued for are not universal and perhaps not 2/3
That's why it's a clear example. If I can show that it isn't true in every possible situation that 1. outfits communicate permission to 1/2
Hope they aren't. I love marzipan.
You'd stare at a woman's tits and get an erection during a job interview? You know you can look away?
kids have to wear burkhas else you think they're trying to get sexual attention from you?
Plot twist: I'm fully capable at not staring at a woman's cleavage when I'm in their company. Do people have to wear a burkha?
tight shorts to feel attractive and be fashionable. Do you think she's dressed for/invited attention from a 50 year old? 2/2
If you don't understand how an outfit can be intended for selective attention, consider a clear example. A 13 year old girl wears 1/2
You're assuming 1. The outfit is communicating (pointing at), and 2. The communication is directed at everyone.
I won't kink shame you
This was originally a reply to a comment that seems to have disappeared.
Insert your choice of tyranny and method of social control to get my original point.
Guessing they don't want every creep on Earth staring
HK are proving themselves quite a threat. With civil uprisings you can often smuggle weapons or get foreign aid.
I voted to change the electoral system during a previous referendum. Most voted to keep the current system.
watches the watchers in China. US is far from being a tyranny. 2/2
As does Britain. London is/was most spied on city in Europe. I picked China because they don't have free press and elections. No one 1/2
But, according to imgur, it's ok if I fat shame and not consider what a person's been through....
you're asking for respect? 5/5
responded by saying it's ok for you to stare in a particular situation (porn interview). Which ignores the entire discussion. And yet 4/5
what I said by giving a biological argument which clearly doesn't determine people's behaviour and ignored what I'd said. You then 3/4
responding to the idea that clothing gives permission to everyone to stare. I argued that this is not a universal rule. You challenged 2/3
Don't think you're following the conversation. Which is what's really annoying on imgur. People just respond to the last msg. I was 1/2
stare and whether it's right or wrong to stare. 2/2
But you know that underage kids do wear inappropriate clothes? The question is whether those clothes give permission to everyone to 1/2
how can these principles have any persuasion? 4/4
strong arguments for it being ok for everyone to stare at cleavage no matter what. But if I can't use examples to test principles then 3/4
stare for all and 2. It's never wrong to stare, then I'll have shown that the rules argued for are not universal and perhaps not 2/3
That's why it's a clear example. If I can show that it isn't true in every possible situation that 1. outfits communicate permission to 1/2
Hope they aren't. I love marzipan.
You'd stare at a woman's tits and get an erection during a job interview? You know you can look away?
kids have to wear burkhas else you think they're trying to get sexual attention from you?
Plot twist: I'm fully capable at not staring at a woman's cleavage when I'm in their company. Do people have to wear a burkha?
tight shorts to feel attractive and be fashionable. Do you think she's dressed for/invited attention from a 50 year old? 2/2
If you don't understand how an outfit can be intended for selective attention, consider a clear example. A 13 year old girl wears 1/2
You're assuming 1. The outfit is communicating (pointing at), and 2. The communication is directed at everyone.
I won't kink shame you
This was originally a reply to a comment that seems to have disappeared.
Insert your choice of tyranny and method of social control to get my original point.
Insert your choice of tyranny and method of social control to get my original point.
Insert your choice of tyranny and method of social control to get my original point.
Insert your choice of tyranny and method of social control to get my original point.
Guessing they don't want every creep on Earth staring
HK are proving themselves quite a threat. With civil uprisings you can often smuggle weapons or get foreign aid.
I voted to change the electoral system during a previous referendum. Most voted to keep the current system.
watches the watchers in China. US is far from being a tyranny. 2/2
As does Britain. London is/was most spied on city in Europe. I picked China because they don't have free press and elections. No one 1/2