4235 pts · June 4, 2013
1) that's not true, and 2) you only care specifically about 1 type of marine animal?
If you care about non-humans just support a good animal charity like Mercy for Animals.
Must judge about 95% of the world pretty harshly then :/
I definitely agree, we have a responsibility to reduce animal suffering, especially when it’s so easy to do so (eg don’t eat them lol).
We can all do our part though. Not eating fish does so much for reducing suffering and environmental damage.
70 billion land animals agree with this statement.
For real though. I can't believe we subject 70 billion land animals and trillions of marine animals to suffering for their flesh.
Save fish by reducing plastic and by not actually eating them. Same with land animals, it's so easy to reduce animal suffering.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBnZPJJ2QG4
Suffering of a mother is always the worst. I still can't believe calves are removed from cows at birth just so we can drink their milk.
You can get heme from plants too, this is misleading.
Not even slightly close.
Yeah the analogy isn't apt. We only put the pigs in gas chambers, then kill them for our pleasure.
Be careful, words like 'cage free', 'free range' and 'organic' are super misleading.
That 99% of animals are factory farmed? Check ya stats mate.
Not even that, just mentioning 'not eating meat' sets off alarm bells for many Imgur users.
You might not 'want' the animal to die a painful death, but again, 99% of the time, that's the reality.
I think most people think this, but the way that 99% of animals are farmed globally is by no means 'humane'.
I didn't expect to see this so spoon.
You accused me of shifting the goal posts and I just told you why I don't think I was. You still haven't explained how I did this.
Give me one example of how my post is 'passive aggressive'. I was very careful to just give facts without judgement.
You started by calling me an asshole on a soapbox, forgive me if I didn't expect you to have my interests in mind.
Criticism is always something to argue over. 'You shifted the posts'. 'No I didn't'. 'Ah! Don't argue now!'
Speaking of disrespect, I get hate-messages just for talking about this. Can you imagine?
Thanks, I agree. I also find it weird that Imgurians respond so poorly to well-meaning advice on how to effectively reduce env. damage.
I didn't do that, but people have a knee-jerk reaction to not eating animal flesh on Imgur.
Farming animals for food is inefficient, it will be environmentally unfriendly almost no matter what way you do it.
It's the opposite, actually. I know that can be hard to swallow for some, but if there is no demand, there is no industry.
I never shifted the posts. I said 'here are two super effective ways'. Both are super effective. Do you take issue with the data?
To delete this toxic app. All the best friend 2/2
1) that's not true, and 2) you only care specifically about 1 type of marine animal?
If you care about non-humans just support a good animal charity like Mercy for Animals.
Must judge about 95% of the world pretty harshly then :/
I definitely agree, we have a responsibility to reduce animal suffering, especially when it’s so easy to do so (eg don’t eat them lol).
We can all do our part though. Not eating fish does so much for reducing suffering and environmental damage.
70 billion land animals agree with this statement.
For real though. I can't believe we subject 70 billion land animals and trillions of marine animals to suffering for their flesh.
Save fish by reducing plastic and by not actually eating them. Same with land animals, it's so easy to reduce animal suffering.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBnZPJJ2QG4
Suffering of a mother is always the worst. I still can't believe calves are removed from cows at birth just so we can drink their milk.
You can get heme from plants too, this is misleading.
Not even slightly close.
Yeah the analogy isn't apt. We only put the pigs in gas chambers, then kill them for our pleasure.
Be careful, words like 'cage free', 'free range' and 'organic' are super misleading.
That 99% of animals are factory farmed? Check ya stats mate.
Not even that, just mentioning 'not eating meat' sets off alarm bells for many Imgur users.
You might not 'want' the animal to die a painful death, but again, 99% of the time, that's the reality.
I think most people think this, but the way that 99% of animals are farmed globally is by no means 'humane'.
I didn't expect to see this so spoon.
You accused me of shifting the goal posts and I just told you why I don't think I was. You still haven't explained how I did this.
Give me one example of how my post is 'passive aggressive'. I was very careful to just give facts without judgement.
You started by calling me an asshole on a soapbox, forgive me if I didn't expect you to have my interests in mind.
Criticism is always something to argue over. 'You shifted the posts'. 'No I didn't'. 'Ah! Don't argue now!'
Speaking of disrespect, I get hate-messages just for talking about this. Can you imagine?
Thanks, I agree. I also find it weird that Imgurians respond so poorly to well-meaning advice on how to effectively reduce env. damage.
I didn't do that, but people have a knee-jerk reaction to not eating animal flesh on Imgur.
Farming animals for food is inefficient, it will be environmentally unfriendly almost no matter what way you do it.
It's the opposite, actually. I know that can be hard to swallow for some, but if there is no demand, there is no industry.
I never shifted the posts. I said 'here are two super effective ways'. Both are super effective. Do you take issue with the data?
To delete this toxic app. All the best friend 2/2