411766 pts · February 10, 2015
https://i.imgur.com/2VsF4Zz.gifv
Nope
…over a blowjob. It was always about the blowjob.
Wrong. He gave technically correct, but misleading answers in a civil deposition because Ann Coulter was too incompetent to legally define a blowjob. Even if you could stretch reality to say he lied, it still wasn't material to the case and therefore was NOT perjury and not illegal. It was always about the blowjob.
You are not wrong in that they claimed as much. The problem was it was never criminal and they knew it yet they still gave Starr $100M clams to NOT so much as indict either Clinton with so much as a parking ticket. It was always about the blowjob.
They always have an explanation. The problem is they start with a doctrinal approach based on belief which assumes the answer and works backwards tying themselves into logical pretzels along the way. The plain reading of the relevant gospels makes it clear and contradicts their "belief" so they just ignore it and/or pretend it means something else.
Donno about you fellers, but I'm gonna be drawing eyes on those pointed hoods
According to the bible, Jesus claimed he would return within his follower's lifetime. When that didn't happen, someone within Christianity should have thought to call bullshit on the whole idea, but here we are.
El Oski was deported recently along with his Fat Nixon tattoo
According to the bible when Joseph found her knocked up he considered divorcing her, which was before the relationship was consummated. So complete in terms of contract fulfillment. Marriage back then wasn’t a contract between man and woman, but rather between man and whatever other man that owned the woman.
To be fair some of them certainly look like a charging port
I'm not falling for that again
Pretty sure that's Tommy Chong
Found the fatass dipshit
v
The big takeaway is the context is female agency wasn't even a thing, let alone consent, and yet this is the example the zealots want everyone to use as a moral compass.
To be fair I think the official account suggests Mary was already married to Joseph when the Holy Poltergeist raped and impregnated her. This might lead an astute reader to question why she was still a virgin, to which the answer could be Joseph deemed her too young for sexual activity as was the common practice of the day to wait a few years for your pre-pubescent bride to mature a little.
Not really because the pit gets in the way, but drill a hole in a cantaloupe and microwave it for a couple of minutes is always a good time.
Just run off a batch while you have it out
I was driving through Munich and I saw a fat dude out on his balcony wearing a spedo. The amount of fucks not given was off the chart.
Do not unmute
Still would
Or shot in the face
I like women on the brown side of ripe
Nope
…over a blowjob. It was always about the blowjob.
Wrong. He gave technically correct, but misleading answers in a civil deposition because Ann Coulter was too incompetent to legally define a blowjob. Even if you could stretch reality to say he lied, it still wasn't material to the case and therefore was NOT perjury and not illegal. It was always about the blowjob.
You are not wrong in that they claimed as much. The problem was it was never criminal and they knew it yet they still gave Starr $100M clams to NOT so much as indict either Clinton with so much as a parking ticket. It was always about the blowjob.
They always have an explanation. The problem is they start with a doctrinal approach based on belief which assumes the answer and works backwards tying themselves into logical pretzels along the way. The plain reading of the relevant gospels makes it clear and contradicts their "belief" so they just ignore it and/or pretend it means something else.
Donno about you fellers, but I'm gonna be drawing eyes on those pointed hoods
According to the bible, Jesus claimed he would return within his follower's lifetime. When that didn't happen, someone within Christianity should have thought to call bullshit on the whole idea, but here we are.
El Oski was deported recently along with his Fat Nixon tattoo
According to the bible when Joseph found her knocked up he considered divorcing her, which was before the relationship was consummated. So complete in terms of contract fulfillment. Marriage back then wasn’t a contract between man and woman, but rather between man and whatever other man that owned the woman.
To be fair some of them certainly look like a charging port
I'm not falling for that again
Pretty sure that's Tommy Chong
Found the fatass dipshit
The big takeaway is the context is female agency wasn't even a thing, let alone consent, and yet this is the example the zealots want everyone to use as a moral compass.
To be fair I think the official account suggests Mary was already married to Joseph when the Holy Poltergeist raped and impregnated her. This might lead an astute reader to question why she was still a virgin, to which the answer could be Joseph deemed her too young for sexual activity as was the common practice of the day to wait a few years for your pre-pubescent bride to mature a little.
Not really because the pit gets in the way, but drill a hole in a cantaloupe and microwave it for a couple of minutes is always a good time.
Just run off a batch while you have it out
I was driving through Munich and I saw a fat dude out on his balcony wearing a spedo. The amount of fucks not given was off the chart.
Do not unmute
Still would
Or shot in the face
I like women on the brown side of ripe