139275 pts ยท September 6, 2011
I like to conversate. Feel free to send me a message anytime about anything.
www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/06/11/how-the-white-house-and-media-got-it-wrong-on-medal-of-honor-recipient-henry-johnson/
Are you implying your inability to eat healthy is what caused covid-19 lol? and you don't want to self "medicate" you want to get high.
I like this idea.
2) process that information, decide what your action is, then act on it. Why do you think it takes the average driver 2.4 seconds to brake?
1) This is with a simple known stimuli and a known action. This is not taking into consideration the time to observe new information,
But you just told me, point blank, an officer should never shoot unless shot at. Their job is to deescalate and getting shot is a risk
2) falling apart, contradicting itself, and seemingly dependent on race or politics. Figure your shit out.
1)You just spent several replies telling me cops should never be allowed to defend themselves unless first shot at. Your argument is
So someone aiming a gun at a cop isn't threatening deadly violence? I thought they need to get shot at first.
I dont have much more to say after this. You're an idiot through and through. It's not a cops job to get shot before they do anything.
2) who was completely unarmed. So does your stance just depend on race or politics.
1)So you state cops need to be shot at before they respond. But your comment history shows you agree with the cops shooting Ashli babbitt
Sure thing bud. So if someone is aiming a gun at you, you cannot defend yourself until they shoot first. That's your standard.
Wow, great points. Sure refuted mine. A human being cannot observe and react that quick. We would need robots to function that flawlessly.
4) all this happened in 0.7 seconds. The average driver takes 2.4 seconds to apply the brakes. This isn't some outrageous event.
3) reasonable for someone to defend themselves. Your response to this scenario wasn't that you could do it, it was "they need to be better!"
2) and attempting to get away. I dont think he deserved to die for that. I do think he put himself in a life or death scenario where it's
1) The *child"*was semi at the very last second, but attempted to hide the gun when getting rid of it. Who was previously shooting it,
A cops job isn't to let someone with a gun shoot them before they respond. That's idiotic.
You dont tase someone with a gun. Yea, he was a kid. Should we look up statistics of how many teenagers murder people with guns in chicago?
2) My hand up toward you. Oh and I was just shooting it and tried to get away from you and its night time.
1)Let's play a game. I'll have a gun in my hand then hide it behind my back. You decide in half a second if I dropped it or not when I bring
Kid had a gun. Kid was shooting the gun earlier. Kid had the gun in his hand 0.7 seconds before he was shot.
It was 0.7 seconds from when he had the gun in his hand to when he got shot. Under a second, not 5 seconds.
Who had a gun in his hand literally 0.7 seconds before he got shot.
2) turns and raises the hand that he just had the gun in. All under a second. This was a reasonable response by the officer.
No human being can observe, orientate, decide, and act in 0.7 seconds. Officer sees he has the gun. Kid drops gun out of cops line of sight
He had the gun in his hand 0.7 seconds before he was shot.
So he has the gun in his right hand literally 1 second before the officer shot.
Except he wasn't standing his ground. He was actively retreating
www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/06/11/how-the-white-house-and-media-got-it-wrong-on-medal-of-honor-recipient-henry-johnson/
Are you implying your inability to eat healthy is what caused covid-19 lol? and you don't want to self "medicate" you want to get high.
I like this idea.
2) process that information, decide what your action is, then act on it. Why do you think it takes the average driver 2.4 seconds to brake?
1) This is with a simple known stimuli and a known action. This is not taking into consideration the time to observe new information,
But you just told me, point blank, an officer should never shoot unless shot at. Their job is to deescalate and getting shot is a risk
2) falling apart, contradicting itself, and seemingly dependent on race or politics. Figure your shit out.
1)You just spent several replies telling me cops should never be allowed to defend themselves unless first shot at. Your argument is
So someone aiming a gun at a cop isn't threatening deadly violence? I thought they need to get shot at first.
I dont have much more to say after this. You're an idiot through and through. It's not a cops job to get shot before they do anything.
2) who was completely unarmed. So does your stance just depend on race or politics.
1)So you state cops need to be shot at before they respond. But your comment history shows you agree with the cops shooting Ashli babbitt
Sure thing bud. So if someone is aiming a gun at you, you cannot defend yourself until they shoot first. That's your standard.
Wow, great points. Sure refuted mine. A human being cannot observe and react that quick. We would need robots to function that flawlessly.
4) all this happened in 0.7 seconds. The average driver takes 2.4 seconds to apply the brakes. This isn't some outrageous event.
3) reasonable for someone to defend themselves. Your response to this scenario wasn't that you could do it, it was "they need to be better!"
2) and attempting to get away. I dont think he deserved to die for that. I do think he put himself in a life or death scenario where it's
1) The *child"*was semi at the very last second, but attempted to hide the gun when getting rid of it. Who was previously shooting it,
A cops job isn't to let someone with a gun shoot them before they respond. That's idiotic.
You dont tase someone with a gun. Yea, he was a kid. Should we look up statistics of how many teenagers murder people with guns in chicago?
2) My hand up toward you. Oh and I was just shooting it and tried to get away from you and its night time.
1)Let's play a game. I'll have a gun in my hand then hide it behind my back. You decide in half a second if I dropped it or not when I bring
Kid had a gun. Kid was shooting the gun earlier. Kid had the gun in his hand 0.7 seconds before he was shot.
It was 0.7 seconds from when he had the gun in his hand to when he got shot. Under a second, not 5 seconds.
Who had a gun in his hand literally 0.7 seconds before he got shot.
2) turns and raises the hand that he just had the gun in. All under a second. This was a reasonable response by the officer.
No human being can observe, orientate, decide, and act in 0.7 seconds. Officer sees he has the gun. Kid drops gun out of cops line of sight
He had the gun in his hand 0.7 seconds before he was shot.
So he has the gun in his right hand literally 1 second before the officer shot.
Except he wasn't standing his ground. He was actively retreating