115 pts ยท December 27, 2011
$3.50
Worth is subjective. It might not be worth it to some people but to others it's worth it because it's the best that money can buy.
Because the left lane is for passing. If the right lane is clear then you should be in the right lane doing your 80 mph.
That "trash can" is 1.5k/month in SF
Could you elaborate on some of the housing issues?
Glad to hear. Digit amputations are fairly routine procedures nowadays.
Well it's hard to corroborate the story with a dead person. You can't just take everyone for their word. Are we sure she wanted to die?
Former friend? What happened?
and r practicing good defensive driving. That along with better braking systems and tires makes 55mph speed limits on 5 lane hwys ridiculous
lane don't actually kill that many people while driving that fast because if you're driving over 90 mph you are probably being very vigilant
ends up killing people. Just the act of traveling at a fast rate isn't necessarily dangerous. I'm pretty sure folks going 90 mph in the fast
Yup, the truth is distracted driving or making mistakes like not seeing a car turning, or not yielding, or not seeing a red light is what
What's not true about it? Also, based on his income ($0)he would qualify for medicaid.
Sure your credit might suffer when you eventually can't pay but I'm sure his credit score is the last thing he's worried about.
He can just go to a hospital. You legally can't be refused treatment. There are tons of patients who are treated and can't/don't pay.
Unpopular opinion: if all the truly starving people and criminals in the world were finger snapped away, the world would be a better place.
Eliminating people randomly is retarded for the reasons you mentioned above.
members of society, e.g. Criminals, the sick and elderly, people already starving to death, etc.
But if you really think about it, it makes no sense for it to be random. If I had to choose I would start with the non productive member
Yeah would be better if Thanos eliminated only the people that were suffering/impoverished. Except that would totally not PC.
Like good for you that you only spend 10 dollars on your clothes. You get a cookie
It's funny people really on their computers and phones writing comments being judgy about someone's clothing.
Ppl cn do whatev they want w/ their disposable income. If they've earned their $ and have the rest of their lives together who are we to jud
Because it's more fun to be angry about something
I'm pretty sure it would be trending on Twitter within 20 minutes.
It's actually just a depth sensor, not a second camera. You can confirm this by covering up the second hole and changing modes.
Still better than Canada ?
Oh I see what you're saying, yeah that first lady was kinda dumb
Lady just stood up right at her seat though? I'm pretty sure the dude is in everyone's space.
Because this is on snapchat. If you tap the screen it skips to the next snap and people have a tendency to just skip things quickly
$3.50
Worth is subjective. It might not be worth it to some people but to others it's worth it because it's the best that money can buy.
Because the left lane is for passing. If the right lane is clear then you should be in the right lane doing your 80 mph.
That "trash can" is 1.5k/month in SF
Could you elaborate on some of the housing issues?
Glad to hear. Digit amputations are fairly routine procedures nowadays.
Well it's hard to corroborate the story with a dead person. You can't just take everyone for their word. Are we sure she wanted to die?
Former friend? What happened?
and r practicing good defensive driving. That along with better braking systems and tires makes 55mph speed limits on 5 lane hwys ridiculous
lane don't actually kill that many people while driving that fast because if you're driving over 90 mph you are probably being very vigilant
ends up killing people. Just the act of traveling at a fast rate isn't necessarily dangerous. I'm pretty sure folks going 90 mph in the fast
Yup, the truth is distracted driving or making mistakes like not seeing a car turning, or not yielding, or not seeing a red light is what
What's not true about it? Also, based on his income ($0)he would qualify for medicaid.
Sure your credit might suffer when you eventually can't pay but I'm sure his credit score is the last thing he's worried about.
He can just go to a hospital. You legally can't be refused treatment. There are tons of patients who are treated and can't/don't pay.
Unpopular opinion: if all the truly starving people and criminals in the world were finger snapped away, the world would be a better place.
Eliminating people randomly is retarded for the reasons you mentioned above.
members of society, e.g. Criminals, the sick and elderly, people already starving to death, etc.
But if you really think about it, it makes no sense for it to be random. If I had to choose I would start with the non productive member
Yeah would be better if Thanos eliminated only the people that were suffering/impoverished. Except that would totally not PC.
Like good for you that you only spend 10 dollars on your clothes. You get a cookie
It's funny people really on their computers and phones writing comments being judgy about someone's clothing.
Ppl cn do whatev they want w/ their disposable income. If they've earned their $ and have the rest of their lives together who are we to jud
Because it's more fun to be angry about something
I'm pretty sure it would be trending on Twitter within 20 minutes.
It's actually just a depth sensor, not a second camera. You can confirm this by covering up the second hole and changing modes.
Still better than Canada ?
Oh I see what you're saying, yeah that first lady was kinda dumb
Lady just stood up right at her seat though? I'm pretty sure the dude is in everyone's space.
Because this is on snapchat. If you tap the screen it skips to the next snap and people have a tendency to just skip things quickly