14286 pts ยท September 21, 2015
It would be more effective to go out and start a business instead of whining on the internet from the McDonalds break room like this person.
PSY has lost a lot of weight.
Yeah exactly, but our government may. No sense worrying about that though.
That's true, but you have to survive the pain to learn the lesson.
Yep, it should be reinstated for confirmations. Nothing getting done is better than whiplash every time a party gets a simple majority.
Is that from your boss or your landlord?
This is the driving force behind the decline of our government. Sad.
Won the battle but lost the war.
Not tough if you are willing to move.
Cz scorpion
I suppose there could be a massive coincidence. They are losing money every minute they're down though and ar15.com was dumped by godaddy
Is to continue the same way and let it continue to happen? For the social media giants to police themselves?
The biden emails at all, or linked to news stories related. It's black and white bias, and you are telling me the best course of action>
Look at the steel dossier vs the hunter biden emails. Both hoaxes. Twitter allowed all links to the dossier, but banned users who mentioned>
They created this enormous social platform, it's their responsibility to regulate it. Every industry has crushing regulations but them.
I would assume there were non terrorists on Parker too. Are we applauding their private messages being hacked as well?
Congrats and enjoy!
Or give them their current protections and do not allow them to limit content at all. It can't be both ways.
Make them liable for any content that they fail to review and remove within a reasonable time frame after it's reported.
Take down any posts, promote any posts. It's an unbelievable amount of power
And the current laws protect social media companies from mass distribution of propoganda. They can ban any user(s) at any time.
The alternative is to make that not the case.
If the nyt posts an incorrect smear campaign, they can be sued. If FB allows identical content while banning other users, they are immune.
Sorry, prosecuted was what I said originally.
So assaults on police should not be investigated? Or the peeps should not be thrown in jail?
Any assault on a police officer should be prosecuted and the criminal should be thrown in jail.
Calculus is applicable to a whole lot of things if it's understood. If you just memorize to pass tests, there's no point.
Liable for their content. The government is giving implicit endorsement to these companies and thus endorsement to their censorship.
They are allowed to choose their content while being protected from liability for content they choose to allow. Other companies are held
It would be more effective to go out and start a business instead of whining on the internet from the McDonalds break room like this person.
PSY has lost a lot of weight.
Yeah exactly, but our government may. No sense worrying about that though.
That's true, but you have to survive the pain to learn the lesson.
Yep, it should be reinstated for confirmations. Nothing getting done is better than whiplash every time a party gets a simple majority.
Is that from your boss or your landlord?
This is the driving force behind the decline of our government. Sad.
Won the battle but lost the war.
Not tough if you are willing to move.
Cz scorpion
I suppose there could be a massive coincidence. They are losing money every minute they're down though and ar15.com was dumped by godaddy
Is to continue the same way and let it continue to happen? For the social media giants to police themselves?
The biden emails at all, or linked to news stories related. It's black and white bias, and you are telling me the best course of action>
Look at the steel dossier vs the hunter biden emails. Both hoaxes. Twitter allowed all links to the dossier, but banned users who mentioned>
They created this enormous social platform, it's their responsibility to regulate it. Every industry has crushing regulations but them.
I would assume there were non terrorists on Parker too. Are we applauding their private messages being hacked as well?
Congrats and enjoy!
Or give them their current protections and do not allow them to limit content at all. It can't be both ways.
Make them liable for any content that they fail to review and remove within a reasonable time frame after it's reported.
Take down any posts, promote any posts. It's an unbelievable amount of power
And the current laws protect social media companies from mass distribution of propoganda. They can ban any user(s) at any time.
The alternative is to make that not the case.
If the nyt posts an incorrect smear campaign, they can be sued. If FB allows identical content while banning other users, they are immune.
Sorry, prosecuted was what I said originally.
So assaults on police should not be investigated? Or the peeps should not be thrown in jail?
Any assault on a police officer should be prosecuted and the criminal should be thrown in jail.
Calculus is applicable to a whole lot of things if it's understood. If you just memorize to pass tests, there's no point.
Liable for their content. The government is giving implicit endorsement to these companies and thus endorsement to their censorship.
They are allowed to choose their content while being protected from liability for content they choose to allow. Other companies are held