156822 pts ยท July 13, 2017
He did? What an odd way to make that point.
Idk im not a scientist
Chipmunk filter needs to die
https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Australia/Canada/Energy
Classic "rules for thee but not for me" attitude. Australia is doing better than Canada with renewables. Look inwards first, not at us
But you're not acknowledging it. You're actively cherry picking outdated data because you refuse to admit you were simply mistaken
https://theconversation.com/australia-is-the-runaway-global-leader-in-building-new-renewable-energy-123694
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energy-data-analysis/energy-facts/renewable-energy-facts/20069
In renewable investment per capita will do that. Your table is from 2014. https://www.energy.gov.au/data/renewables
Difference? BTW as of 2020 Australia gets 21% of its power from renewables and Canada gets.... 16% 6 years of leading the world
higher consumption rate than Australia lol. Also I said investment in renewables not current power drawn from them. Do you know the
That site literally backs up what I'm saying. Energy use per capita vs percentage in extreme poverty also pins Canada with a
Who started it. I want more context for the turkey battle!
Maybe set some of that hockey time aside for self reflection instead.
That's literally what we are doing by leading the world in per capita investment in renewables. How is Canada owning up to theirs?
Small trucks roaming about fucking up cars and shit. So eat a dick Canada. Sincerely yours, an Australian.
You pollute water more than Australia, you have 1/16th the amount of parks we have and to top it all off you have giant deer things the size
Also Canada has worse air quality, worse water quality, and worse co2 emissions from transport. You also fish 4 times more than Australia
Almost identical. Proving my point. Maybe you ought to start calling for more investment in renewables instead of shitting on my country
Canada is literally ranked directly behind Australia in terms of co2 emissions per 1000 people with a 1% difference.
Would nullify our carbon emission reduction in a single year.
Australia doesn't even scratch the surface. We could switch off all power for a year and the growth of India, China and america
And again we lead the world in investment in renewables per capita meaning that footprint will be reduced.
The population of our entire country is less than some cities in America. Our usage per capita is high because we are massive
Russia is laughable and to act as if we are dragging our feet behind AMERICA? . We contribute something like 1.1% annually.
I'de say it's likely we will keep selling coal until the world doesn't want it anymore (fast approaching) but to compare our impact with
Australia leads the world in per capita investment in the renewable industry. Our states have alot of freedom to govern themselves
lower their bottom line. No different to the tobacco lobby that did the same thing for decades.
It's not about the supplying it's about the suppression of research and lobbying the gov to stop laws that would help the environment but
He did? What an odd way to make that point.
Idk im not a scientist
Chipmunk filter needs to die
https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Australia/Canada/Energy
Classic "rules for thee but not for me" attitude. Australia is doing better than Canada with renewables. Look inwards first, not at us
But you're not acknowledging it. You're actively cherry picking outdated data because you refuse to admit you were simply mistaken
https://theconversation.com/australia-is-the-runaway-global-leader-in-building-new-renewable-energy-123694
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energy-data-analysis/energy-facts/renewable-energy-facts/20069
In renewable investment per capita will do that. Your table is from 2014. https://www.energy.gov.au/data/renewables
Difference? BTW as of 2020 Australia gets 21% of its power from renewables and Canada gets.... 16% 6 years of leading the world
higher consumption rate than Australia lol. Also I said investment in renewables not current power drawn from them. Do you know the
That site literally backs up what I'm saying. Energy use per capita vs percentage in extreme poverty also pins Canada with a
Who started it. I want more context for the turkey battle!
Maybe set some of that hockey time aside for self reflection instead.
That's literally what we are doing by leading the world in per capita investment in renewables. How is Canada owning up to theirs?
Small trucks roaming about fucking up cars and shit. So eat a dick Canada. Sincerely yours, an Australian.
You pollute water more than Australia, you have 1/16th the amount of parks we have and to top it all off you have giant deer things the size
Also Canada has worse air quality, worse water quality, and worse co2 emissions from transport. You also fish 4 times more than Australia
Almost identical. Proving my point. Maybe you ought to start calling for more investment in renewables instead of shitting on my country
Canada is literally ranked directly behind Australia in terms of co2 emissions per 1000 people with a 1% difference.
Would nullify our carbon emission reduction in a single year.
Australia doesn't even scratch the surface. We could switch off all power for a year and the growth of India, China and america
And again we lead the world in investment in renewables per capita meaning that footprint will be reduced.
The population of our entire country is less than some cities in America. Our usage per capita is high because we are massive
Russia is laughable and to act as if we are dragging our feet behind AMERICA? . We contribute something like 1.1% annually.
I'de say it's likely we will keep selling coal until the world doesn't want it anymore (fast approaching) but to compare our impact with
Australia leads the world in per capita investment in the renewable industry. Our states have alot of freedom to govern themselves
lower their bottom line. No different to the tobacco lobby that did the same thing for decades.
It's not about the supplying it's about the suppression of research and lobbying the gov to stop laws that would help the environment but