5092 pts ยท July 20, 2017
ive got a bad feeling about this...
Lesser scale.
Running towards a school with another bomb, they should and are allowed to shoot them to stop the threat. That is what happened here, on a
In the eyes of the law, that use of force is allowed. As it should be. If someone just bombed a hospital, and an officer sees them...
No.
Had he not been a threat, he wouldn't have been shot. The threat was stopped.
It was not issued as a punishment, that's what you fail to see. Deadly force was used to prevent a threat from harming others.
He was in a car that had been involved in a drive by. At that point all occupants are considered the shooter and are armed and dangerous
So shooting at someone in an attempt to kill them isn't dangerous to you? That's worrying.
The officer used appropriate force to stop an extremely dangerous criminal from escaping and trying to kill anyone else.
Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, firing a firearm from a vehicle, felonious evasion, attempted murder, resisting arrest, and more
Based on recent previous actions. Just like they do with an active shooter.
I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. The officers had reasonable suspicious to perceive him as an active threat to society
That's like saying cops cannot shoot active shooters because that's not their choice.
He was deemed a threat before he was shot. Also he had many chances, he decided to use them all up when he got involved in a drive by
He was deemed a threat to society because of his recent actions. Had he put his hands up and surrendered, it wouldn't have happened.
That's a statistical fact. Doubting it just makes you look opposed to reality.
Justified.
Every single officer that has ever killed someone even if its 100% justified is charged with that crime. It is then determined if it was
They were tho. Wasn't it a felony stop?
They are. Thousands of police officers face legal arrests every year and are charged with crimes. They are fired and placed in prison.
His hands were positive for Gunshot residue btw
Reasonable suspicions to believe he was a threat to the public. Maybe if he hadn't done a drive by shooting he wouldn't have gotten shot?
The person involved in a drive by shooting, who had a gun under him in the car, and a mag in his pants. They shot him because they had
White people get shot more by police than anyone else.
That also includes dogs that are attacking people.
Not really. There are so many of them that bad things are bound to happen, and since the media dislike them only the bad is shown.
Source?
Even if the news published a thousand articles today that's a minuscule amount of police compared to the total.
Why would they get charged in a justified shooting??
As me saying they don't deserve rights? Cop haters usually make stretches like that so I'm not surprised
Lesser scale.
Running towards a school with another bomb, they should and are allowed to shoot them to stop the threat. That is what happened here, on a
In the eyes of the law, that use of force is allowed. As it should be. If someone just bombed a hospital, and an officer sees them...
No.
Had he not been a threat, he wouldn't have been shot. The threat was stopped.
It was not issued as a punishment, that's what you fail to see. Deadly force was used to prevent a threat from harming others.
He was in a car that had been involved in a drive by. At that point all occupants are considered the shooter and are armed and dangerous
So shooting at someone in an attempt to kill them isn't dangerous to you? That's worrying.
The officer used appropriate force to stop an extremely dangerous criminal from escaping and trying to kill anyone else.
Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, firing a firearm from a vehicle, felonious evasion, attempted murder, resisting arrest, and more
Based on recent previous actions. Just like they do with an active shooter.
I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. The officers had reasonable suspicious to perceive him as an active threat to society
That's like saying cops cannot shoot active shooters because that's not their choice.
He was deemed a threat before he was shot. Also he had many chances, he decided to use them all up when he got involved in a drive by
He was deemed a threat to society because of his recent actions. Had he put his hands up and surrendered, it wouldn't have happened.
That's a statistical fact. Doubting it just makes you look opposed to reality.
Justified.
Every single officer that has ever killed someone even if its 100% justified is charged with that crime. It is then determined if it was
They were tho. Wasn't it a felony stop?
They are. Thousands of police officers face legal arrests every year and are charged with crimes. They are fired and placed in prison.
His hands were positive for Gunshot residue btw
Reasonable suspicions to believe he was a threat to the public. Maybe if he hadn't done a drive by shooting he wouldn't have gotten shot?
The person involved in a drive by shooting, who had a gun under him in the car, and a mag in his pants. They shot him because they had
White people get shot more by police than anyone else.
That also includes dogs that are attacking people.
Not really. There are so many of them that bad things are bound to happen, and since the media dislike them only the bad is shown.
Source?
Even if the news published a thousand articles today that's a minuscule amount of police compared to the total.
Why would they get charged in a justified shooting??
As me saying they don't deserve rights? Cop haters usually make stretches like that so I'm not surprised