12444 pts ยท February 21, 2015
bio
You say this based on... The nice way you can tack a moronic insult on the end? Thanks. You've added greatly to the discussion
What? Where?
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So your defense of this "trenchant insight" is that the subject of the quote is unclear. Bravo. You've sold me on OPs wisdom
And you forgot: I can't post a link like that because there aren't any quotes from survivors as vapid as OPs post
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. Martin Luther King jr
Please cite the logical fallacies I've employed. Have you every studied logic? Because if you had, you wouldn't say that. And define "basic"
Then maybe you should be a little more judicious on your defense rather than blindly agreeing with empty pablum
Post a link to one. Then another link to a serious work that verifies indeed, the war could have been prevented with more caring. I'll wait
Stop being so sure of your uninformed opinions. Monarchies also have politicians. You might have heard of Winston Churchill
Oh, and I forgot, another reason for the war was people "didn't care enough." Andu're defending this overblown Love Is... cartoon of a post?
Wrong. The post posits that the underlying force that lead to the war was "intolerance" and "hate speech." That's just childish gibberish
But more likely you are ignorant of the evolution of the concept of intolerance in the 20th Century. And choose to post your ignorance publi
I have already answered this point directly
You must be ignoring my responses to your comments because you're repeating yourself.
Five words in a tautology appropos of nothing. Care to try again? We're looking for proof that contradicts my claim, remember?
I'll check back over the next week. You let me know how popular that term was among the general public in 1939. Then call me stupid again
Intolerance didn't mean then what it means now. And please cite an example of "hate speech" being used in common parlance prior to 1990.
People used to understand it isn't a good idea to comment or criticize things you don't know about. Now people post their ignorance
I've read many, many books. That is the definitive history of the war, not "one book." And since you clearly haven't read it, shut up
OP can't be right because the post doesn't say anything. It's gibberish, reverse anachronisms, meaningless words and insufferable smugness
attention to the "feelings" of the German people? Your perspective bias is so overwhelming is funny. Or, you really think that.
They "felt left alone by other politicians"? Seriously? WWII could have been avoided if those damn Weimar Republicans had paid better
Ever heard of the book The Rise And Fall of the Third Reich? Read it. Then defend empty gibberish you want
Wrong. Read a book
You say this based on... The nice way you can tack a moronic insult on the end? Thanks. You've added greatly to the discussion
What? Where?
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So let's rewrite it according to your interpretation. "The gas chambers didn't start with the gas chambers.." Oops. Gibberish from jump str
So your defense of this "trenchant insight" is that the subject of the quote is unclear. Bravo. You've sold me on OPs wisdom
And you forgot: I can't post a link like that because there aren't any quotes from survivors as vapid as OPs post
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. Martin Luther King jr
Please cite the logical fallacies I've employed. Have you every studied logic? Because if you had, you wouldn't say that. And define "basic"
Then maybe you should be a little more judicious on your defense rather than blindly agreeing with empty pablum
Post a link to one. Then another link to a serious work that verifies indeed, the war could have been prevented with more caring. I'll wait
Stop being so sure of your uninformed opinions. Monarchies also have politicians. You might have heard of Winston Churchill
Oh, and I forgot, another reason for the war was people "didn't care enough." Andu're defending this overblown Love Is... cartoon of a post?
Wrong. The post posits that the underlying force that lead to the war was "intolerance" and "hate speech." That's just childish gibberish
But more likely you are ignorant of the evolution of the concept of intolerance in the 20th Century. And choose to post your ignorance publi
I have already answered this point directly
You must be ignoring my responses to your comments because you're repeating yourself.
Five words in a tautology appropos of nothing. Care to try again? We're looking for proof that contradicts my claim, remember?
I'll check back over the next week. You let me know how popular that term was among the general public in 1939. Then call me stupid again
Intolerance didn't mean then what it means now. And please cite an example of "hate speech" being used in common parlance prior to 1990.
People used to understand it isn't a good idea to comment or criticize things you don't know about. Now people post their ignorance
I've read many, many books. That is the definitive history of the war, not "one book." And since you clearly haven't read it, shut up
OP can't be right because the post doesn't say anything. It's gibberish, reverse anachronisms, meaningless words and insufferable smugness
attention to the "feelings" of the German people? Your perspective bias is so overwhelming is funny. Or, you really think that.
They "felt left alone by other politicians"? Seriously? WWII could have been avoided if those damn Weimar Republicans had paid better
Ever heard of the book The Rise And Fall of the Third Reich? Read it. Then defend empty gibberish you want
Wrong. Read a book