10098 pts ยท December 9, 2011
No, it's 'honey', not 'woman'.
The US isn't the 'most free' at anything. That's a lie peddled to you to make you not question authority or try and improve the country.
It's almost like the fact doesn't change.
You seem pretty miserable
Could be a screenshot they half forgot the context for when they decided to post it later.
That you don't mean shit to them, but they'll pretend you do if it's mildly inconvenient.
Just so you know, it's 'stutter'
Are you a Canadian visiting London?
It's not even math, it's an automatic association if you spend more than 5 minutes learning it.
You pay the bill for other people's roads, police, firefighters, insurance, defence, schooling and so on. What's health on top of that?
Mostly just me
I know, right? My voice is a fucking asshole.
:(
Oh my god. I never noticed
So does every other country that manages to fund a health service
And people will go to the ends of the earth to justify and defend this system even though it actively hurts them.
"Feeeeemales"
Exactly. Everyone pays in through taxes, no money goes to shareholders, admin costs are massively reduced.
Why wouldn't it work on a federal level? The way you propose, the richer states will be fine and poor states will continue to suffer.
There's pretty much every first world country other than America's health system.
No, the point is taking dividends and making profit runs counter to the idea of a public service. You can't have both.
You can own something and skim money from it. That's what profits and dividends are for, are they not?
People are dying because they can't afford it. You're proposing a solution already proven to be a failure.
If it's so simple, why are people having to ration insulin or buy it from other countries where it's cheaper?
Then there is no hope for you. Close the web page and stop trying to get into discussions about economics.
You were *so* close to getting it. So close...
When you're done with the non-sequiturs, come talk with the adults :)
You know what actually would? Completely funding it with taxes and having no shareholders skimming vast sums of money off the top.
Even democratically elected ones. The 'helpful hand' of the US conveniently plops dictators in their place.
The socialist bit of the Nazis was so they could pull votes away from socialist parties. They later murdered all the socialists in the party
No, it's 'honey', not 'woman'.
The US isn't the 'most free' at anything. That's a lie peddled to you to make you not question authority or try and improve the country.
It's almost like the fact doesn't change.
You seem pretty miserable
Could be a screenshot they half forgot the context for when they decided to post it later.
That you don't mean shit to them, but they'll pretend you do if it's mildly inconvenient.
Just so you know, it's 'stutter'
Are you a Canadian visiting London?
It's not even math, it's an automatic association if you spend more than 5 minutes learning it.
You pay the bill for other people's roads, police, firefighters, insurance, defence, schooling and so on. What's health on top of that?
Mostly just me
I know, right? My voice is a fucking asshole.
:(
Oh my god. I never noticed
So does every other country that manages to fund a health service
And people will go to the ends of the earth to justify and defend this system even though it actively hurts them.
"Feeeeemales"
Exactly. Everyone pays in through taxes, no money goes to shareholders, admin costs are massively reduced.
Why wouldn't it work on a federal level? The way you propose, the richer states will be fine and poor states will continue to suffer.
There's pretty much every first world country other than America's health system.
No, the point is taking dividends and making profit runs counter to the idea of a public service. You can't have both.
You can own something and skim money from it. That's what profits and dividends are for, are they not?
People are dying because they can't afford it. You're proposing a solution already proven to be a failure.
If it's so simple, why are people having to ration insulin or buy it from other countries where it's cheaper?
Then there is no hope for you. Close the web page and stop trying to get into discussions about economics.
You were *so* close to getting it. So close...
When you're done with the non-sequiturs, come talk with the adults :)
You know what actually would? Completely funding it with taxes and having no shareholders skimming vast sums of money off the top.
Even democratically elected ones. The 'helpful hand' of the US conveniently plops dictators in their place.
The socialist bit of the Nazis was so they could pull votes away from socialist parties. They later murdered all the socialists in the party