-223 pts ยท April 21, 2020
I assumed it was a navy thing.
Racist is too broad a term to be actionable. Same with white supremacist.
More like a racketeer for the elite. This kind of thing was going on long before capitalism.
thing that happened that they needed to wait for.
They didn't wait, she was an activist who intentionally generated the required event. Nothing wrong with that, but it wasn't an organic
Things are getting better. These kinds of thing used to be 20 years away.
How is the judge a white supremacist?
She looks like an ugly fish.
Maybe the dutch can work on developing technology to hold back the sea?
Yes you can. Read the statute.
It seems a bit unlikely that the judge is a white supremacist.
I'm pretty sure there was at least one more mentioned in court.
No worries. Thanks for your time.
your self defence right back.
dealing with something wild along the lines of Ruby Ridge. Even with provocation by trying in good faith to withdraw/deescalate you can get
it. You absolutely can shoot cops if you meet the self defence statute. Conceivably a shooter could shoot at cops, but you'd have to be
Provoke has to either be a criminal act likely to provoke others to attack you, or any action intended to get others to attack you. That's
No, I've read the law in the state. Just Google "wisconsin self defense statute". It's quite brief.
defence.
Again, it's not provocation if it's justified. If he reasonably believed his life was in danger from the crowd, then you are back to self
meds.
that? If I recall he couldn't stay at his girlfriends place because of the terms of his release, so he was out on the street without his
he was very well. I know I threw around him being a paedophile kind of flippantly, but would you not have to at least have some issues to do
stuff she couldn't recall. He hadn't been able to collect his prescription. He'd also dine time for raping 5 boys aged 9-11. I don't think
The first guy was in a psych ward due to suicide attempts. His girlfriend said he was on anti-depressants, something for bipolar and other
can't have been acting in self defence.
It feels like people want to say if the person Rittenhouse shot honestly thought they were acting in self defence, then Rittenhouse
other peoples thinking.
I'd be interested to know what you think about the provocation thing. I'm interested because I wonder if your take is motivating a lot of
wasn't the case. To some degree they are separate, but for some questions they have to be taken together.
I assumed it was a navy thing.
Racist is too broad a term to be actionable. Same with white supremacist.
More like a racketeer for the elite. This kind of thing was going on long before capitalism.
thing that happened that they needed to wait for.
They didn't wait, she was an activist who intentionally generated the required event. Nothing wrong with that, but it wasn't an organic
Things are getting better. These kinds of thing used to be 20 years away.
How is the judge a white supremacist?
She looks like an ugly fish.
Maybe the dutch can work on developing technology to hold back the sea?
Yes you can. Read the statute.
It seems a bit unlikely that the judge is a white supremacist.
I'm pretty sure there was at least one more mentioned in court.
No worries. Thanks for your time.
your self defence right back.
dealing with something wild along the lines of Ruby Ridge. Even with provocation by trying in good faith to withdraw/deescalate you can get
it. You absolutely can shoot cops if you meet the self defence statute. Conceivably a shooter could shoot at cops, but you'd have to be
Provoke has to either be a criminal act likely to provoke others to attack you, or any action intended to get others to attack you. That's
No, I've read the law in the state. Just Google "wisconsin self defense statute". It's quite brief.
defence.
Again, it's not provocation if it's justified. If he reasonably believed his life was in danger from the crowd, then you are back to self
meds.
that? If I recall he couldn't stay at his girlfriends place because of the terms of his release, so he was out on the street without his
he was very well. I know I threw around him being a paedophile kind of flippantly, but would you not have to at least have some issues to do
stuff she couldn't recall. He hadn't been able to collect his prescription. He'd also dine time for raping 5 boys aged 9-11. I don't think
The first guy was in a psych ward due to suicide attempts. His girlfriend said he was on anti-depressants, something for bipolar and other
can't have been acting in self defence.
It feels like people want to say if the person Rittenhouse shot honestly thought they were acting in self defence, then Rittenhouse
other peoples thinking.
I'd be interested to know what you think about the provocation thing. I'm interested because I wonder if your take is motivating a lot of
wasn't the case. To some degree they are separate, but for some questions they have to be taken together.