If you have found yourself here, I am 100% sure that there are a million more important things you could be doing right now. sign some petitions or something: https://avaaz.org/en/ Have a nice day!
If you have found yourself here, I am 100% sure that there are a million more important things you could be doing right now. sign some petitions or something: https://avaaz.org/en/ Have a nice day!
These buildings have 'poor doors', so that people living in the social housing mandated by the local authority can't get into that part of the building or use any of the nice amenities. Disgusting. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/feb/02/penthouses-poor-doors-nine-elms-battersea-london-luxury-housing-development
Conveniently named climate magazine! https://www.itsfreezinginla.co.uk/
There’s no such thing as fake words!
How important that is depends how much money you have
Quite a lot of native Americans still retain elements of their native beliefs, some almost entirely
Questioning is good, you just have to weigh up whether the theory or the evidence (or both) is faulty - evidence is theory laden
My first comment is ‘sometimes it’s ok to question the evidence’ I haven’t been a part of any conspiracy theory defence? Look up yourself??
No we weren’t. And where did I defend them? I was just saying an uncomfortable truth - logically, science cannot give us true ‘facts’
No, I’m saying that it’s reasonable not to attach yourself to any theory too closely, and see theories as predicting tools - not ‘truths’
It’s called the pessimistic meta induction - it’s a well known part of the philosophy of science
Not quite, I’m arguing that you can never know whether science is getting closer to absolute truth/‘facts’ - science is a confidence thing
Sure, but accepting things as 'facts' /'evidence' that can't be overturned later with a different theory/better evidence is also delusional
This is great - I wanna know what kinda cool stuff he came up with before
Sometimes it’s ok to question the evidence, especially if you think it’s faulty
Or philosophical anti-realism - a belief held by a lot of physicists themselves
Traffic circle????? Roundabout mate.
In communications theory this is called the ‘deficit’ theory and is actually quite outdated.
The Elliot smith happiness mash up is fucking fantastic - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DyvkqXWOrOk
I can't believe that this is the most sane comment I've seen so far on this post
Sending love and well wishes to all of you from the very bottom of my heart. Massive respect to all of you xxx
/how the Air Force had given orders to drop many more bombs, and had a third waiting on island of tinian, its coincidence that there were 2
Yes, but moreso how exactly the military constructed and publicised the 'two bombs won the war' myth, especially through emperor Hirohito
Read 5 days in august by Michael Gordin. Brilliant piece of scholarship, puts idea that 2 bombs were dropped to end the war - to bed.
I can't believe I read all of that
True, although violence was sporadic, but again, in response to centuries of persecution from the church in its alliance with landowners
Difference is, on the nationalist side, violence against leftists, teachers, workers etc, organised/state sanctioned - e.g badajoz massacre
In the first months of the war, in some cities the republicans found it hard to control popular violence against the church, but did try...
Sad as I sounds, to most of spain, the church represented centuries of oppression, and were allied with fascist Franco during the war.
i'm keen! where are your favourite hikes!
We absolutely have to go, or that you generally recommend??