2273 pts ยท June 13, 2015
This is your public profile. Write something about yourself! no
https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
No it wouldn't. Even if they say that, it wouldn't. I believe American's have a right not to have their hospitals overwhelmed by idiots.
No
Most deaths would have came from hospitals being over whelmed, which hasn't happened as much as it could have. https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
Thanks to the measures being taken. https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
That would be envious, and eat my ass.
A society with billionaires is not a virtuous society. I will support what I support to change this, all the while ignoring people like you.
yes quite a lot more https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0d7X_4YtNE by jaboody dubs
is now the market will never "learn its lesson" because being underpaid is what is fueling the market's own demand of cheap goods.
reason, then other people who are also getting underpayed might have to shop there so they can better feed themselves and family. As it 2/3
but if the store underpays their staff, and then has the lowest price on goods, either because of underpaying or for some other 1/3
the states' rights to be able to put any kind of reasonable restriction on people during times such as these, which includes protesting.
...no, just no to whatever point that was trying to make. But here is a supreme court ruling (Jacobson v. Massachusetts) 100% backing up 1/2
about just their rights, its about the safety of the public and in this case, their protesting is very dangerous to themselves to others.
liberties and even constitutional rights may be "reasonably restricted" when the "safety of the general public may demand" This isn't 2/3
As far as Supreme Court precedent goes, the ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, albeit about 115 years ago, does state that personal 1/3
Look up covid curve, then use your mind and add on: private healthcare, 100s of millions of people, and dumbass republicans. It adds up.
When they ask, don't drink the coolaid.
Stop pretending that you aren't some GOP bootlicker and are trying to gaslight others. Get some new words "triggered" is so over used.
We found him, Mr. both sides man. The comment's greatest mediocre super-hero here to save us from nothing.
Don't worry, we have people losing their minds at a state governor because they can't get stuff like paint over here. Real crazy people.
If no lock downs / stay at home orders / closing of unessential businesses, the US could hit over 1 mil easy before the end of the year.
I do agree that a lot of my fellow Americans are cunts, but there is a difference between being "cynical" and an edgy dumbass.
make sure that is the chase, and clearly she is being proven right by all the nonsense and pushback that they are indeed dumbasses.
https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
No it wouldn't. Even if they say that, it wouldn't. I believe American's have a right not to have their hospitals overwhelmed by idiots.
No
Most deaths would have came from hospitals being over whelmed, which hasn't happened as much as it could have. https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
Thanks to the measures being taken. https://imgur.com/eVw1Efg
That would be envious, and eat my ass.
A society with billionaires is not a virtuous society. I will support what I support to change this, all the while ignoring people like you.
yes quite a lot more https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0d7X_4YtNE by jaboody dubs
is now the market will never "learn its lesson" because being underpaid is what is fueling the market's own demand of cheap goods.
reason, then other people who are also getting underpayed might have to shop there so they can better feed themselves and family. As it 2/3
but if the store underpays their staff, and then has the lowest price on goods, either because of underpaying or for some other 1/3
the states' rights to be able to put any kind of reasonable restriction on people during times such as these, which includes protesting.
...no, just no to whatever point that was trying to make. But here is a supreme court ruling (Jacobson v. Massachusetts) 100% backing up 1/2
about just their rights, its about the safety of the public and in this case, their protesting is very dangerous to themselves to others.
liberties and even constitutional rights may be "reasonably restricted" when the "safety of the general public may demand" This isn't 2/3
As far as Supreme Court precedent goes, the ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, albeit about 115 years ago, does state that personal 1/3
Look up covid curve, then use your mind and add on: private healthcare, 100s of millions of people, and dumbass republicans. It adds up.
When they ask, don't drink the coolaid.
Stop pretending that you aren't some GOP bootlicker and are trying to gaslight others. Get some new words "triggered" is so over used.
We found him, Mr. both sides man. The comment's greatest mediocre super-hero here to save us from nothing.
Don't worry, we have people losing their minds at a state governor because they can't get stuff like paint over here. Real crazy people.
If no lock downs / stay at home orders / closing of unessential businesses, the US could hit over 1 mil easy before the end of the year.
I do agree that a lot of my fellow Americans are cunts, but there is a difference between being "cynical" and an edgy dumbass.
make sure that is the chase, and clearly she is being proven right by all the nonsense and pushback that they are indeed dumbasses.