21735 pts ยท December 13, 2013
if you screenshot this and get it to fp, I'll dm you a picture of my ballsack.
I feel like that could be defeated with like... A palm sized rock...
Ever lose.
You're out of your mind if you think a hundred million armed individuals, integrated full stack with the supply line of 9ne million, could 1
Okay, but when N. Vietnam or the taliban beat the same military with a comparative dozen people what do we call that?
About the number of actual trigger pullers they have.
We're talking about a h u n d r e d m i l l i o n armed individuals against less than 2 million, less than 1 million if we want to get real1
How did the Vietnamese do it with 300,000? You think the VC had hueys and m249s and moabs and gunships?
Because the transport routes between bases is very soft
One hundred to one
This week its "see how bad trumps numbers are" next week its "see how well desantis embodies republican ideology"
No, fox news is stacking coins on the desantis pile
And are fully integrated into that militaries supply chain. The armed forces would be starving in DAYS.
Like, i dont think you realize the implications of any military trying to operate against a group of people that outnumber them 100 to 1, 1/
Yes. Sure they may kill 1 or 10 or 50, but how long do those drones last with no fuel reaching airbases, no ammo being transported?
All of which is manufactured, transported, and managed by civilians, over civilian transportation routes.
Do combat. Its anywhere from 6 to 1 to 10 to 1 support personell to combatant ratio. The military uses fuel, food, and ammo.
Raise the question of the invulnerability of the armed forces. Now, we can pair down that 1.6 because most of the us armed forces doesnt 4
A trigger puller, tank driver, or fighter pilot. There are 135 MILLION gun owners in the US. 100 to 1 is enough to raise an eyebrow and 3
The armed population. We can liberally ballpark around 1.6 million people active duty in the us armed forces. Lets say every one of them is2
Now im all for some good faith regulations and blah blah, but you are fucking delusional if you think the military stands a chance against 1
Make a wish wise? For sure. But zhong xina also bends the knee and toes the line for the CCP soooo
Actually this makes oz look like a peta activist. People just don't understand how horrible peta is.
My sister and I discovered CSS because their music came with the Zune(new and had potential at the time) I still jam out to lmlaltdfa freque
The entire city of new Orleans would like to know your location.
It's probably working even better since the high wind whipped rain washed the panels off.
(note the bent bolt and PU scope, you don't go into a building with 3.5x or 6.5x zoom) and converting them back isn't field work.
I feel like that could be defeated with like... A palm sized rock...
Ever lose.
You're out of your mind if you think a hundred million armed individuals, integrated full stack with the supply line of 9ne million, could 1
Okay, but when N. Vietnam or the taliban beat the same military with a comparative dozen people what do we call that?
About the number of actual trigger pullers they have.
We're talking about a h u n d r e d m i l l i o n armed individuals against less than 2 million, less than 1 million if we want to get real1
How did the Vietnamese do it with 300,000? You think the VC had hueys and m249s and moabs and gunships?
Because the transport routes between bases is very soft
One hundred to one
This week its "see how bad trumps numbers are" next week its "see how well desantis embodies republican ideology"
No, fox news is stacking coins on the desantis pile
And are fully integrated into that militaries supply chain. The armed forces would be starving in DAYS.
Like, i dont think you realize the implications of any military trying to operate against a group of people that outnumber them 100 to 1, 1/
Yes. Sure they may kill 1 or 10 or 50, but how long do those drones last with no fuel reaching airbases, no ammo being transported?
All of which is manufactured, transported, and managed by civilians, over civilian transportation routes.
Do combat. Its anywhere from 6 to 1 to 10 to 1 support personell to combatant ratio. The military uses fuel, food, and ammo.
Raise the question of the invulnerability of the armed forces. Now, we can pair down that 1.6 because most of the us armed forces doesnt 4
A trigger puller, tank driver, or fighter pilot. There are 135 MILLION gun owners in the US. 100 to 1 is enough to raise an eyebrow and 3
The armed population. We can liberally ballpark around 1.6 million people active duty in the us armed forces. Lets say every one of them is2
Now im all for some good faith regulations and blah blah, but you are fucking delusional if you think the military stands a chance against 1
Make a wish wise? For sure. But zhong xina also bends the knee and toes the line for the CCP soooo
Actually this makes oz look like a peta activist. People just don't understand how horrible peta is.
My sister and I discovered CSS because their music came with the Zune(new and had potential at the time) I still jam out to lmlaltdfa freque
The entire city of new Orleans would like to know your location.
It's probably working even better since the high wind whipped rain washed the panels off.
(note the bent bolt and PU scope, you don't go into a building with 3.5x or 6.5x zoom) and converting them back isn't field work.