2780 pts ยท May 9, 2015
And you get rid of those nasty undesirable people.
Where you selling yours at? My guy only gives me $500 per kidney!
Nice, Godwin's Law at work. That is where I quit arguing.
... congrats, you just played yourself.
Not so much for the rest of the world. That may sound bad, but everyone has to look out for themselves.
You sure? Half our national debt is because of our trade deficit. That is free trade btw. Protectionism is great... for that country.
Is it a thief's fault when he steals, or the shop he stole from? It doesn't matter, you dont punish the circumstances that made the thief.
Retrieved from: http://cis.org/node/4573
Would you care to revise or clarify your statement? Source something, perhaps?
"This is 2.7 percent of GDP, or $405 billion in wage losses suffered by American workers because of immigration. This is not trivial. "
According to the Center for Immigration studies 2013 findings:
I get this point, however, should the jobs not go first to citizens? The legal immigrants?
Massive amounts of death? We won't make them go on a Trail of Tears, we have busses.
am familiar.
A loss of employees and rehiring does not equate to operate at a loss. I own one company, my wife owns another, and I am opening another. I
to be here. Others waited in line and came legally, they fully deserve it. I should know, my wife is a legal immigrant.
Yes, people who immigrated illegally and/or are residing illegally. Yes, mass emigration is hard, however, I am arguing they have no right
So, we shouldn't care?
all estimated 12 million illegal immigrants left tomorrow, and companies mostly wanted to rehire, would that be a job shortage?
There are 6.4059mil unemployed and looking for jobs, and 5.5938mil openings in the sectors they list. Shortfall: 812,000 jobs. Lets say
According to http://stateofworkingamerica.org/charts/unemployed-and-job-openings-by-industry/
Because automation is already causing a shift in demand, we should not care about the other factors. Is that what is being said?
illegals entering, so they really are fucking people who actually DO wait their turn. 6/6
services (roads, schools, hospitals) that are funded from tax they may or may not have paid. Also, USA reduces visas based on suspected 5/
accepting lower wages (and takn are jurbs), and 3, sometimes taking wages under the table (tax evasion). Tertiary point, they use public 4/
the favor shifts to the workers, and the companies must compete for workers by raising wages. Illegals, 1, shouldn't be here. 2, are 3/
and only 50 jobs, favor goes to companies, they can pay w/e and some will take it. However, if there are only 50 people and 100 jobs, 2/
Well, illegal immigrants ARE a problem. Most just cannot articulate it well. Supply and demand. If there are 100 people looking for jobs, 1/
"Being respectful of others opinions, even if you think they are wrong" is a class they should have, and you should watch it.
Well, when we took Italy from Mussolini, you guys only saw our GIs. They are good people, but a bit rough.
And you get rid of those nasty undesirable people.
Where you selling yours at? My guy only gives me $500 per kidney!
Nice, Godwin's Law at work. That is where I quit arguing.
... congrats, you just played yourself.
Not so much for the rest of the world. That may sound bad, but everyone has to look out for themselves.
You sure? Half our national debt is because of our trade deficit. That is free trade btw. Protectionism is great... for that country.
Is it a thief's fault when he steals, or the shop he stole from? It doesn't matter, you dont punish the circumstances that made the thief.
Retrieved from: http://cis.org/node/4573
Would you care to revise or clarify your statement? Source something, perhaps?
"This is 2.7 percent of GDP, or $405 billion in wage losses suffered by American workers because of immigration. This is not trivial. "
According to the Center for Immigration studies 2013 findings:
I get this point, however, should the jobs not go first to citizens? The legal immigrants?
Massive amounts of death? We won't make them go on a Trail of Tears, we have busses.
am familiar.
A loss of employees and rehiring does not equate to operate at a loss. I own one company, my wife owns another, and I am opening another. I
to be here. Others waited in line and came legally, they fully deserve it. I should know, my wife is a legal immigrant.
Yes, people who immigrated illegally and/or are residing illegally. Yes, mass emigration is hard, however, I am arguing they have no right
So, we shouldn't care?
all estimated 12 million illegal immigrants left tomorrow, and companies mostly wanted to rehire, would that be a job shortage?
There are 6.4059mil unemployed and looking for jobs, and 5.5938mil openings in the sectors they list. Shortfall: 812,000 jobs. Lets say
According to http://stateofworkingamerica.org/charts/unemployed-and-job-openings-by-industry/
Because automation is already causing a shift in demand, we should not care about the other factors. Is that what is being said?
illegals entering, so they really are fucking people who actually DO wait their turn. 6/6
services (roads, schools, hospitals) that are funded from tax they may or may not have paid. Also, USA reduces visas based on suspected 5/
accepting lower wages (and takn are jurbs), and 3, sometimes taking wages under the table (tax evasion). Tertiary point, they use public 4/
the favor shifts to the workers, and the companies must compete for workers by raising wages. Illegals, 1, shouldn't be here. 2, are 3/
and only 50 jobs, favor goes to companies, they can pay w/e and some will take it. However, if there are only 50 people and 100 jobs, 2/
Well, illegal immigrants ARE a problem. Most just cannot articulate it well. Supply and demand. If there are 100 people looking for jobs, 1/
"Being respectful of others opinions, even if you think they are wrong" is a class they should have, and you should watch it.
Well, when we took Italy from Mussolini, you guys only saw our GIs. They are good people, but a bit rough.