101629 pts · February 19, 2015
This is the Liberal President: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-uZ5">CZvQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-uZ5sMCZvQ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaJwkI7AIZE a true believer where Trump is an opportunist and Fascist enabler.
Glorious
Just like in '68, under a Democratic President. Biden or Trump, both are part of the problem that keeps the genocide machine roaring.
Exactly that page, I don't who downvoted you for posting this.
Just link them the command and conquer page from B'tselem, the Israeli Human Rights organization.
Ben Gurion, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak, Golda Meir and many others set the foundation for today starting from Ze'ev Jabotinsky, Chaim Weizmann and Theodor Herzl's blueprint for colonialism.
I'm going to use this comment to plug three highly recommended books for more contemporary and historical context: The Hundred Years' War on Palestine by Rashid Khalidi (Palestinian and Prof at CU), Gaza: An Inquest into its Martyrdom by Norman Finklestein whose parents survived the Holocaust and fought in the Warsaw uprising and The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Israeli New Historian Ilan Pappé whose parents also fled Nazi persecution. This genocide is not happening in a vacuum.
Google UNRWA torture. They extracted confessions through torture. On that note, The Intercept has a great expose on Netanyahu purposefully using and funneling money to Hamas militant wing for their purposes.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/29/israelandthepalestinians1There is very clear genocidal intent in the Knesset, and this isn't just the Hardliners in Likkud, or Otzma-Yehudit or Jewish National Front. Here are Rabbi being arrested in Israel: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/26/world/middleeast/rabbis-arrested-gaza-israel-border-starvation.html (3)
also provided further sources demonstrating Israel's genocidal intent from a spokesperson for hostages families themselves, Netanyahu himself. Would you like me to cite Yoav Gallant? Or Ben Ari? Or the fact that Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalal Smotrich while the world is distracted are arming settler terrorists and encroaching further in the West Bank? I can even cite Abby Martins' documentary on how racist to Arabs Israeli society or this, from 2008 during Ehud Olmerts PMship: (2)
No no no no, don't misconstrue my words. October 7th didn't happen in a vacuum, I laid out the history and the context behind which it happened while affirming that yes, Hamas carried out an atrocity while also citing UN 181 on Palestine. Hezbollah, the militant fighting force of the Lebanese is fighting a war of defense against Israel, which very recently without reason, launched attacks against them as well in addition to attacking an Iranian Consulate in Syria in further escalation. I (1)
of the protests, here are zionists: https://twitter.com/loffredojeremy/status/1783651274975523285 doing very normal things.Here's Netanyahu boasting about opposition to two-states: https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-boasts-of-thwarting-the-establishment-of-a-palestinian-state-for-decades/ What are you trying to do here? (3)
calls for a secular one-state solution, you know, what South Africa has and even then South Africa still has a ways to go. They want an end to the apartheid that separates families, that makes it illegal for Palestinians to travel, to communicate with each other, an end to the checkpoints and limited passports, and mind you, it's Netanyahu who has even admitted and boasted he has stifled the chances for two-states (for which I will provide the source). On the other end of the spectrum (2)
The attempts to focus on the optics of a protest when there is a very clear crime and perpetrator is a tactic to distract. I don't care that they are parading the flag of Hezbollah when Israel has like in Sabrah and Shatilla, attacked Lebanon. The main organizations like Jewish Voices for Peace, Students for Justice in Palestine have already disavowed agents provaceteurs. Next, "We don't want a two state. We want 1948. We don't want a two state. We want all of it." is not antisemitic and (1)
I never blocked you. I don't really block anyone.
Stop misconstruing what these protests represent. You know very well what you're trying to do. They are protesting against the apartheid, for a ceasefire, not for the annihilation of the Jewish people. You even tried to cite Norman Finklestein, famous or infamous for his own opposition to Israel in your lies.
Thank you for coming mask off, Fascist.
revising history where Jews lived in Palestine prior to 48 and obscuring that they are referring to the STATE OF ISRAEL and not the Jewish people. Here's an example of one such other manipulation from AU: https://x.com/antoinette_news/status/173474431140801">82">https://x.com/antoinette_news/status/1734744311408017682 - https://x.com/antoinette_news/status/1753186897424494911 (4)
deride as "self-hating Jews" are involved in these protests. The Jewish people have a right to a home, as do all people, but not at the expense of other ethnic groups. This re-litigation of history and fearmongering you're engaging with rides in the face of all anti-colonial struggles, and of the resistance that the Jews of Warsaw engaged in. Third, since you insist on stating these don't advocate for peace, you provided one where protesters were stating "we want 48" mischaracterized and (3)
First off, with a ceasefire, there is no peace to start. They are protesting for a ceasefire and eventual dissolution of the apartheid and occupation. You cannot have peace where an asymmetry of power exists. The UN itself allows self-defense by any means, which it has stated in the past and in Resolution 181, Palestine has a right to. It is unfortunate that by Israel's own hand, that self-defense is often through Hamas' militant wing. Second, plenty of anti-Zionist Jews, which Nazis and (2)
So Biden can do things now that we know the GOP will bitch about is what I'm hearing?
Exactly, and they have been. In Israel alone, Orthodox Jews are being threatened, arrested, stopped from protesting, or threatened with conscription. Recently some Rabbis, American and Israeli were arrested for protesting for a ceasefire.
for the cause. He does not disparage the remark as being antisemitic. Do you believe that Israel represents all Jewish people? And this is the dangerous trap that exists now, because truly antisemitic people, Nazis would have that be only as containment and a target. Not all Jewish people, Finklestein included, believe Israel is their state nor that they have a right to some biblically chartered homeland that they shared with the ancestors of the very Palestinians Israel murders. (3)
population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit country, while denying it any employment in our country [...] discreetly and circumspectly”. The Zionists had no intention to ever share that land. And further in the video as you pointed out where Dr. Finklestein is challenging the slogan, he clarifies, a slogan has to capture the passions of others, he recommends it has to be changed for practical reasons for the moment and to exercise maximum responsibility (2)
I am interested in an intellectually honest discussion, however, the partition plan was not respected in 47, the partition plan was further disrespected in '67, and 2005 and now further today in the West Bank. We cannot deny that. The Israeli delegation, never had a single intention for a Palestinian state. Herzl appropriated Lord Shaftesbury, “a peoplewithout a land for a land without a people" and in his personal diaries wrote “expropriate gently […] spirit the penniless... " (1)
Israel, even under Netanyahu or Sharon or Begin, has never represented. Israel is a settler-colonialist state and an extension of the ethnic state projects that Europe once attempted, and that is not right under any circumstance, especially not at the expense of other human beings. There is a distinction between the State of Israel and the Jewish Peoples at large. (4)
empty promises of national liberation of Palestine. The Mufti was also opposed to other Arab national identities. And I did watch this talk Dr. Finklestein gave, he recognizes that the protesters are not pro-Hamas as you and legacy media outlets try to build consent for the idea. They are not brainwashed, they are angry that their futures are not only being stolen by a capricious indifferent elite in our government, but used to stifle life elsewhere in defense of "managed" democracy that (3)
Jewish people. It is not antisemitic inherently, this isn't to discount however that you have open antisemites like Nicholas Fuentes and Jackson Hinkle taking either side of the issue because or despite their antisemetic beliefs. Next, yes, Hajj Amin al-Husseini was antisemitic however did not facilitate the holocaust, extermination or ethnic cleansing of Jewish peoples as Netanyahu tried to accuse him of to justify further hatred of Palestinians. Hitler wanted to court al-Husseini under (2)
No no no no, the Palestinians were excluded out of direct mention where in the instance of the wider pan-Arab world, the Egyptians, Suadis, Lebanese, Syrians, etc. in cases exclusive to them were mentioned directly. There was a concerted effort from early Zionist settler movements to write out the Palestinians as they believed in a "land without people for a people without land". Next, "From the River to the Sea..." refers to the occupation of Palestine, and the Nation of Israel, not the (1)
existence of the Palestinian people. San Remo Conference in 1920, Peel Commission Report 37 which acknowledges that Arab states exist but did not mention Palestinians, The original British Mandate declaration which did not establish political rights for Palestinian Arabs setting the foundation for Jewish settlers to be able to self-fund the displacement of Palestinians. The Jewish settlers had the Jewish National Fund which bought land stolen by the British and arms abroad as well. (2)
This is the Liberal President: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-uZ5">CZvQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-uZ5sMCZvQ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaJwkI7AIZE a true believer where Trump is an opportunist and Fascist enabler.
Glorious
Just like in '68, under a Democratic President. Biden or Trump, both are part of the problem that keeps the genocide machine roaring.
Exactly that page, I don't who downvoted you for posting this.
Just link them the command and conquer page from B'tselem, the Israeli Human Rights organization.
Ben Gurion, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak, Golda Meir and many others set the foundation for today starting from Ze'ev Jabotinsky, Chaim Weizmann and Theodor Herzl's blueprint for colonialism.
I'm going to use this comment to plug three highly recommended books for more contemporary and historical context: The Hundred Years' War on Palestine by Rashid Khalidi (Palestinian and Prof at CU), Gaza: An Inquest into its Martyrdom by Norman Finklestein whose parents survived the Holocaust and fought in the Warsaw uprising and The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Israeli New Historian Ilan Pappé whose parents also fled Nazi persecution. This genocide is not happening in a vacuum.
Google UNRWA torture. They extracted confessions through torture. On that note, The Intercept has a great expose on Netanyahu purposefully using and funneling money to Hamas militant wing for their purposes.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/29/israelandthepalestinians1
There is very clear genocidal intent in the Knesset, and this isn't just the Hardliners in Likkud, or Otzma-Yehudit or Jewish National Front.
Here are Rabbi being arrested in Israel: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/26/world/middleeast/rabbis-arrested-gaza-israel-border-starvation.html (3)
also provided further sources demonstrating Israel's genocidal intent from a spokesperson for hostages families themselves, Netanyahu himself. Would you like me to cite Yoav Gallant? Or Ben Ari? Or the fact that Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalal Smotrich while the world is distracted are arming settler terrorists and encroaching further in the West Bank? I can even cite Abby Martins' documentary on how racist to Arabs Israeli society or this, from 2008 during Ehud Olmerts PMship: (2)
No no no no, don't misconstrue my words. October 7th didn't happen in a vacuum, I laid out the history and the context behind which it happened while affirming that yes, Hamas carried out an atrocity while also citing UN 181 on Palestine. Hezbollah, the militant fighting force of the Lebanese is fighting a war of defense against Israel, which very recently without reason, launched attacks against them as well in addition to attacking an Iranian Consulate in Syria in further escalation. I (1)
of the protests, here are zionists: https://twitter.com/loffredojeremy/status/1783651274975523285 doing very normal things.
Here's Netanyahu boasting about opposition to two-states: https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-boasts-of-thwarting-the-establishment-of-a-palestinian-state-for-decades/
What are you trying to do here? (3)
calls for a secular one-state solution, you know, what South Africa has and even then South Africa still has a ways to go. They want an end to the apartheid that separates families, that makes it illegal for Palestinians to travel, to communicate with each other, an end to the checkpoints and limited passports, and mind you, it's Netanyahu who has even admitted and boasted he has stifled the chances for two-states (for which I will provide the source).
On the other end of the spectrum (2)
The attempts to focus on the optics of a protest when there is a very clear crime and perpetrator is a tactic to distract. I don't care that they are parading the flag of Hezbollah when Israel has like in Sabrah and Shatilla, attacked Lebanon. The main organizations like Jewish Voices for Peace, Students for Justice in Palestine have already disavowed agents provaceteurs. Next, "We don't want a two state. We want 1948. We don't want a two state. We want all of it." is not antisemitic and (1)
I never blocked you. I don't really block anyone.
Stop misconstruing what these protests represent. You know very well what you're trying to do. They are protesting against the apartheid, for a ceasefire, not for the annihilation of the Jewish people. You even tried to cite Norman Finklestein, famous or infamous for his own opposition to Israel in your lies.
Thank you for coming mask off, Fascist.
revising history where Jews lived in Palestine prior to 48 and obscuring that they are referring to the STATE OF ISRAEL and not the Jewish people. Here's an example of one such other manipulation from AU: https://x.com/antoinette_news/status/173474431140801">82">https://x.com/antoinette_news/status/1734744311408017682 -
https://x.com/antoinette_news/status/1753186897424494911 (4)
deride as "self-hating Jews" are involved in these protests. The Jewish people have a right to a home, as do all people, but not at the expense of other ethnic groups. This re-litigation of history and fearmongering you're engaging with rides in the face of all anti-colonial struggles, and of the resistance that the Jews of Warsaw engaged in. Third, since you insist on stating these don't advocate for peace, you provided one where protesters were stating "we want 48" mischaracterized and (3)
First off, with a ceasefire, there is no peace to start. They are protesting for a ceasefire and eventual dissolution of the apartheid and occupation. You cannot have peace where an asymmetry of power exists. The UN itself allows self-defense by any means, which it has stated in the past and in Resolution 181, Palestine has a right to. It is unfortunate that by Israel's own hand, that self-defense is often through Hamas' militant wing. Second, plenty of anti-Zionist Jews, which Nazis and (2)
So Biden can do things now that we know the GOP will bitch about is what I'm hearing?
Exactly, and they have been. In Israel alone, Orthodox Jews are being threatened, arrested, stopped from protesting, or threatened with conscription. Recently some Rabbis, American and Israeli were arrested for protesting for a ceasefire.
for the cause. He does not disparage the remark as being antisemitic. Do you believe that Israel represents all Jewish people? And this is the dangerous trap that exists now, because truly antisemitic people, Nazis would have that be only as containment and a target. Not all Jewish people, Finklestein included, believe Israel is their state nor that they have a right to some biblically chartered homeland that they shared with the ancestors of the very Palestinians Israel murders. (3)
population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit country, while denying it any employment in our country [...] discreetly and circumspectly”. The Zionists had no intention to ever share that land. And further in the video as you pointed out where Dr. Finklestein is challenging the slogan, he clarifies, a slogan has to capture the passions of others, he recommends it has to be changed for practical reasons for the moment and to exercise maximum responsibility (2)
I am interested in an intellectually honest discussion, however, the partition plan was not respected in 47, the partition plan was further disrespected in '67, and 2005 and now further today in the West Bank. We cannot deny that. The Israeli delegation, never had a single intention for a Palestinian state. Herzl appropriated Lord Shaftesbury, “a people
without a land for a land without a people" and in his personal diaries wrote “expropriate gently […] spirit the penniless... " (1)
Israel, even under Netanyahu or Sharon or Begin, has never represented. Israel is a settler-colonialist state and an extension of the ethnic state projects that Europe once attempted, and that is not right under any circumstance, especially not at the expense of other human beings. There is a distinction between the State of Israel and the Jewish Peoples at large. (4)
empty promises of national liberation of Palestine. The Mufti was also opposed to other Arab national identities. And I did watch this talk Dr. Finklestein gave, he recognizes that the protesters are not pro-Hamas as you and legacy media outlets try to build consent for the idea. They are not brainwashed, they are angry that their futures are not only being stolen by a capricious indifferent elite in our government, but used to stifle life elsewhere in defense of "managed" democracy that (3)
Jewish people. It is not antisemitic inherently, this isn't to discount however that you have open antisemites like Nicholas Fuentes and Jackson Hinkle taking either side of the issue because or despite their antisemetic beliefs. Next, yes, Hajj Amin al-Husseini was antisemitic however did not facilitate the holocaust, extermination or ethnic cleansing of Jewish peoples as Netanyahu tried to accuse him of to justify further hatred of Palestinians. Hitler wanted to court al-Husseini under (2)
No no no no, the Palestinians were excluded out of direct mention where in the instance of the wider pan-Arab world, the Egyptians, Suadis, Lebanese, Syrians, etc. in cases exclusive to them were mentioned directly. There was a concerted effort from early Zionist settler movements to write out the Palestinians as they believed in a "land without people for a people without land". Next, "From the River to the Sea..." refers to the occupation of Palestine, and the Nation of Israel, not the (1)
existence of the Palestinian people. San Remo Conference in 1920, Peel Commission Report 37 which acknowledges that Arab states exist but did not mention Palestinians, The original British Mandate declaration which did not establish political rights for Palestinian Arabs setting the foundation for Jewish settlers to be able to self-fund the displacement of Palestinians. The Jewish settlers had the Jewish National Fund which bought land stolen by the British and arms abroad as well. (2)