HarshTruths

-42 pts ยท April 9, 2015


I fucking love the design of the Dullahan. I want that armor in every game from now on.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or keep your organs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's only too soon if she's still warm.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hollywood viking funerals. Real viking burials are either a mound, or buried into a clearing, with their ships. Basic Scandinavian history.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, because being concerned for a dog's health sure is stupid, and keeping it alive for your selfish reasons sure is the best thing to do!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"He doesn't agree with me, he must be a troll." is effectively what you are saying. I'm fully aware what I am saying, and I know I'm right.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Something a dog is extremely dependent upon, as they tend to grow a constant dizziness from losing their senses. Which is why it's selfish.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I like how caring for a dog's well-being is "morbid" now, instead of selfishly keeping it alive when it can't use it's basic senses. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Being selfish when it comes to a dogs health, because you interpret it as being happy - is a sign of it being well, is cruel in of itself.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

The dog is happy due to smell. Deprived of both hearing, and sight, it only relies on smell - and without sight, that is disorienting a dog.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

If your dog goes blind and deaf, and you don't put it down to be kind towards the dog, you're effectively committing animal cruelty. Shame.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Of course. I'm not saying you can't do this, or that. I'm just really against the idea of getting children, for the sake of it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Again. Every parent thinks themselves as a good parent, and capable. You don't know you are meeting their needs until much later in life.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Every parent thinks themselves capable of handling any amount of children after 2. Getting 4 children for the sake of getting it is selfish.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

but that will not be any different for the child whose attention needs aren't being met. Less children means less broken hearts for the kids

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm not talking about ignoring, I'm talking about dividing your attention between children. You can be the most caring parent in the world >

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They get ignored, and then there will be depression, and anger. Having 10 children is outright cruel, and should be illegal.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

It's not about playing with each other. At some point, they will contend for parental attention, and someone will keep a tally on each time.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Why try for 4? The larger the family, the less focus there is on a child and the worse they feel. One in a hundred can handle four children.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

If you're living in the past to such a degree that the "N-Word" as it were still offends you, you really need to stop being melodramatic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is one of the main reasons why Obama and Clinton is/was liked as presidents, because they appear more human than other presidents.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The #8 is entirely wrong. Filler words are important, especially in a speech. You appear more human than trying to read from a paper.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't glorify and coddle the real term for it because you think it sounds offensive. You're only furthering the coddling of this generation.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Why would they make you uncomfortable? It was the norm back then, it got changed with time. To them, it was no different than owning a maid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds to me like you heavily overcharge based on nothing but your self-confidence.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0