82599 pts ยท September 6, 2016
Fueled by the cursedness of all ideas related to the Space Shuttle. Pre-, during-, Post- Shuttle Era. So many cursed proposals and concepts. It's marvellous.
Dictatorships don't just evaporate just cus the leader dies.
It's not as much of an issue as anti-nuke campaigns what you to think.
You dare overstep your mortal authority!
It's closer to people just buying the cheapest of the cheap.
And it'll use up an absurd amount of energy while containing the worst and most poisonous materials
There are only so many cars a road can handle. Increasing the flow rate wont solve the problem of congestion. Only decreasing cars
Or maybe actually replan cities to make driving cars less of a need
Self driving cars are the opposite of a solution. You'd do absolutly nothing to reduce the traffic on the road
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss_(image)
The what now?
Underwater pyramid filled with angry laser puffer fish
Ah, so this is just a desperate attempt to turn this into anti nuclear bs
Rings very strong against pressure from inside, but very weak against shearing force.
That is not bliss. The real bliss is located in California and is full of grape plants
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss_(image)a wine county in California
Do explain to me how this is even remotely close to "being a bootlicker".
There's nothing corperate shill to be against vandalism. If you want to add the current controversy, there are proper ways of doing it
That's not the definition of controversy
It's vandalism
If you actually write them as facts, with proper citation and written without emotion
History and controversy sections usually have citations, sources and a neutral writing style
It has neither citations, sources, nor an emotion free writing
As much as the message is valid, it's still vandalism of something intended to be neutral information. Doesn't matter if you agree with it
Wrong character
25% of 320 mil is still about 80 million.
Not the point at all
Very typical 70s Architecture. Plain ugly tbh
And how are these relevant at the time of the articles posting
Dictatorships don't just evaporate just cus the leader dies.
It's not as much of an issue as anti-nuke campaigns what you to think.
You dare overstep your mortal authority!
It's closer to people just buying the cheapest of the cheap.
And it'll use up an absurd amount of energy while containing the worst and most poisonous materials
There are only so many cars a road can handle. Increasing the flow rate wont solve the problem of congestion. Only decreasing cars
Or maybe actually replan cities to make driving cars less of a need
Self driving cars are the opposite of a solution. You'd do absolutly nothing to reduce the traffic on the road
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss_(image)
The what now?
Underwater pyramid filled with angry laser puffer fish
Ah, so this is just a desperate attempt to turn this into anti nuclear bs
Rings very strong against pressure from inside, but very weak against shearing force.
That is not bliss. The real bliss is located in California and is full of grape plants
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss_(image)a wine county in California
Do explain to me how this is even remotely close to "being a bootlicker".
There's nothing corperate shill to be against vandalism. If you want to add the current controversy, there are proper ways of doing it
That's not the definition of controversy
It's vandalism
If you actually write them as facts, with proper citation and written without emotion
History and controversy sections usually have citations, sources and a neutral writing style
It has neither citations, sources, nor an emotion free writing
As much as the message is valid, it's still vandalism of something intended to be neutral information. Doesn't matter if you agree with it
Wrong character
25% of 320 mil is still about 80 million.
Not the point at all
Very typical 70s Architecture. Plain ugly tbh
And how are these relevant at the time of the articles posting