24 pts ยท January 3, 2015
Correction the external network doesn't see where the actual source and destination.
Always looking to learn.
You're assumption that your neighbor cant snoop is not the traditional concept of a VPN. The internal network cannot see where traffic is go
From wiki, "Traditional VPNs are characterized by a point-to-point topology,.."
He's talking about a traditional VPN I would imagine. One that is actually configured on both ends.
I see they have, I don't think any of us (anyone in my squad) would have pulled the trigger.
Essentially what I am saying is I believe we could have shot this guy and been "justified" although with as much stand off that I believe..
In of itself no. I also would like to say that not having a weapon does not mean the soldier is outside the ROE.
PID of a weapon is misleading, meaning we could shoot anyone with a gun and be fine, that's not really accurate.
EOF (escalation of force) helped substantiate your concern. Shout, show, shove, shoot a warning shot, shoot to kill. You can skip steps.
2006-2010 was reasonable certainty that you or someelse's life was in danger. I.E. 51% sure. Just explain why you felt threatened.
That's irrelevant to their responsibility when it comes to handling firearms in an urban setting
That's more of an opinion. I could easily argue otherwise.
Seem's educational to me. They get close its docile, they splash it attacks.
+ for saying theoretically, for those that don't know all transfer rates are theoretical. IE cat 6 theoretically can get 1Gb/s
At least that's what I was told by several of my previous coworkers that were laid off about 5-6 years ago....
Well they have been getting rid of their wired infrastructure and focusing on their wireless network for several years now right?
out the window. Take a trip and decide for yourself.
45% of our population has access to more than 1 broadband provider 45% have only 1. 10% have 0 according to 2015 regulations that just went
The technology has had made significant progress over the last decade in regard to speed though.
convenient. Even though its less secure and slower people don't seem to care. They still want it and in rural area's its more cost effective
Pretty sure it's been the trend in telecommunications for the past decade or so. There's been a high demand for wireless because it's 1/x
I've watched people die for it so I'll pass. Could you perhaps do something constructive and/or go somewhere else if you are unhappy?
Stop waking your parents.
I see, but I have a hard time believing in the impossible.
Point being we should guarantee everyone's successful?
Yeah fuck you for pointing out it's a land of opportunity and not a land of guaranteed success. (Assuming this is America related post)
Interesting that's typically the ping time I see (at best) between directly connected devices.
To one Broadband ISP, 45% have more than, 45% have only one and I assume 10% don't have access. Dial up still exist I think.
Skill should acknowledged. Anyway id like a chance it chat to explain why I don't think this topic is as black as white as many people think
Correction the external network doesn't see where the actual source and destination.
Always looking to learn.
You're assumption that your neighbor cant snoop is not the traditional concept of a VPN. The internal network cannot see where traffic is go
From wiki, "Traditional VPNs are characterized by a point-to-point topology,.."
He's talking about a traditional VPN I would imagine. One that is actually configured on both ends.
I see they have, I don't think any of us (anyone in my squad) would have pulled the trigger.
Essentially what I am saying is I believe we could have shot this guy and been "justified" although with as much stand off that I believe..
In of itself no. I also would like to say that not having a weapon does not mean the soldier is outside the ROE.
PID of a weapon is misleading, meaning we could shoot anyone with a gun and be fine, that's not really accurate.
EOF (escalation of force) helped substantiate your concern. Shout, show, shove, shoot a warning shot, shoot to kill. You can skip steps.
2006-2010 was reasonable certainty that you or someelse's life was in danger. I.E. 51% sure. Just explain why you felt threatened.
That's irrelevant to their responsibility when it comes to handling firearms in an urban setting
That's more of an opinion. I could easily argue otherwise.
Seem's educational to me. They get close its docile, they splash it attacks.
+ for saying theoretically, for those that don't know all transfer rates are theoretical. IE cat 6 theoretically can get 1Gb/s
At least that's what I was told by several of my previous coworkers that were laid off about 5-6 years ago....
Well they have been getting rid of their wired infrastructure and focusing on their wireless network for several years now right?
out the window. Take a trip and decide for yourself.
45% of our population has access to more than 1 broadband provider 45% have only 1. 10% have 0 according to 2015 regulations that just went
The technology has had made significant progress over the last decade in regard to speed though.
convenient. Even though its less secure and slower people don't seem to care. They still want it and in rural area's its more cost effective
Pretty sure it's been the trend in telecommunications for the past decade or so. There's been a high demand for wireless because it's 1/x
I've watched people die for it so I'll pass. Could you perhaps do something constructive and/or go somewhere else if you are unhappy?
Stop waking your parents.
I see, but I have a hard time believing in the impossible.
Point being we should guarantee everyone's successful?
Yeah fuck you for pointing out it's a land of opportunity and not a land of guaranteed success. (Assuming this is America related post)
Interesting that's typically the ping time I see (at best) between directly connected devices.
To one Broadband ISP, 45% have more than, 45% have only one and I assume 10% don't have access. Dial up still exist I think.
Skill should acknowledged. Anyway id like a chance it chat to explain why I don't think this topic is as black as white as many people think