1290 pts ยท June 7, 2015
Is it though? Because i can't remember any of that. Then again, i don't consider the sequel trilogy canon... Maybe i need to rewatch the OT
Aesthetic choice or race of specific character is not a proof by itself. Until a character states such things DIRECTLY its not a thing.
Fair enough. Although never heard of that book...
Need a citation on that, including the definition of "left wing government" and citation that empire was right wing, and not just upper wing
No. My point is that i dont remember Luke Skywalker trying to sell me socialism as he beats someone up for advocating for controlled borders
So here's the wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States). The 1st section describes almost perfectly.
Unfortunately the definition does not fits the imgur's symbol limit. I hate having political debates on this digital fast-food site...
ANTIFA, a group united by specific ideological values and one that even has an emblem (flag?... can it be counted as one?..)
I'm sure the guy he decided to fight with was a reasonable well-spoken individual and not a cliche cringe strawman.
What i'm trying to say is: They are anti-fascist by their actions. They are NOT part of a certain radical left-wing partizan movement.
What they were not doing is beating up average citizens with bats and bike-locks for saying "Maybe the tyrant has a point"
These examples were fighting violent tyrants who were actively going out of their way to commit attrocities.
Good point, i quickly realized that my original message makes no sense. HOWEVER. There is a difference here that we need to adress:
I don't remember any of those violently beating up people they politically disagree with...
Probably was forced to due to some bureaucracy.
My thought also. WIth hands that thin i'm afraid her shoulder is going to get absolutely ruined
I think them being in Edem was THE certificate. Probably.
Honestly the only scene i disliked in the entire movie. It was just too obvious. "What's subtle?" the suggester of the scene, probably
Now THAT'S suspicious.
Ironically, i'm invested and know x2 or x3 more about western politics and social issues, than of russian. Maybe i should migrate one day...
Unfortunately i'm not the man to ask. I'm not invested in my country's politics enough and actually pretty apathic to all of this.
In fact first 5 or something results for "arrest of navalniy" are about him being sent to a hospital today, for whatever reason
It also could be on the "hot news" tab, since i don't check those and could easily missed it.
Yandex search engine does shows it if you ask specifically about it. Alternative news sources too, by the looks of it.
But if its just "we want to know before hand and have a record on our files" and they don't get to make deicions on it - its fine.
As for bureaucracy of protests: i don't know how its managed. If they get to decide which protest is allowed or not - okay, that's wrong.
Well its not a blackout, the news about the protest are on mainsteam sites like Yandex. The thing is that there's just not enough context.
Well it is illegal, since in russia you must fill some bureacratic forms so that the protest was official.
I guess that sums it up. The last thing that confuses are the cordons and why the crowd felt the need to break them.
If you'll find out - please tell me too, since i'm curious if this protest was justified. For now im just neutral.
Is it though? Because i can't remember any of that. Then again, i don't consider the sequel trilogy canon... Maybe i need to rewatch the OT
Aesthetic choice or race of specific character is not a proof by itself. Until a character states such things DIRECTLY its not a thing.
Fair enough. Although never heard of that book...
Need a citation on that, including the definition of "left wing government" and citation that empire was right wing, and not just upper wing
No. My point is that i dont remember Luke Skywalker trying to sell me socialism as he beats someone up for advocating for controlled borders
So here's the wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States). The 1st section describes almost perfectly.
Unfortunately the definition does not fits the imgur's symbol limit. I hate having political debates on this digital fast-food site...
ANTIFA, a group united by specific ideological values and one that even has an emblem (flag?... can it be counted as one?..)
I'm sure the guy he decided to fight with was a reasonable well-spoken individual and not a cliche cringe strawman.
What i'm trying to say is: They are anti-fascist by their actions. They are NOT part of a certain radical left-wing partizan movement.
What they were not doing is beating up average citizens with bats and bike-locks for saying "Maybe the tyrant has a point"
These examples were fighting violent tyrants who were actively going out of their way to commit attrocities.
Good point, i quickly realized that my original message makes no sense. HOWEVER. There is a difference here that we need to adress:
I don't remember any of those violently beating up people they politically disagree with...
Probably was forced to due to some bureaucracy.
My thought also. WIth hands that thin i'm afraid her shoulder is going to get absolutely ruined
I think them being in Edem was THE certificate. Probably.
Honestly the only scene i disliked in the entire movie. It was just too obvious. "What's subtle?" the suggester of the scene, probably
Now THAT'S suspicious.
Ironically, i'm invested and know x2 or x3 more about western politics and social issues, than of russian. Maybe i should migrate one day...
Unfortunately i'm not the man to ask. I'm not invested in my country's politics enough and actually pretty apathic to all of this.
In fact first 5 or something results for "arrest of navalniy" are about him being sent to a hospital today, for whatever reason
It also could be on the "hot news" tab, since i don't check those and could easily missed it.
Yandex search engine does shows it if you ask specifically about it. Alternative news sources too, by the looks of it.
But if its just "we want to know before hand and have a record on our files" and they don't get to make deicions on it - its fine.
As for bureaucracy of protests: i don't know how its managed. If they get to decide which protest is allowed or not - okay, that's wrong.
Well its not a blackout, the news about the protest are on mainsteam sites like Yandex. The thing is that there's just not enough context.
Well it is illegal, since in russia you must fill some bureacratic forms so that the protest was official.
I guess that sums it up. The last thing that confuses are the cordons and why the crowd felt the need to break them.
If you'll find out - please tell me too, since i'm curious if this protest was justified. For now im just neutral.