14205 pts ยท January 13, 2015
I like marmalade sandwiches. Feel free to PM me random things.
I am being too technically here but i would call this "coercion".
You already have this power. We all do
Arent you the one that tried to take the context away by comparing this to terrorists? It is funny that you niow talk about accurate...
that violence has some sort of positive effect on either education or political progress. But there is not a single one.
And i don't know where you got this false assumption that i could never be convinced. I can be convinced with scientific studys that show
Its funny how defensive you get. Moral high ground is something i critized on you. This shows me that you did not read my comments.
Now that last one was a hyperbole. And im out. I don't like your hyper relativistic stances. It feels like your stance is all and nothing.
Will you also cheer on the guy that decides to punch his ex girlfriend because she made him uncomfortable? "GO! ONE MORE! BRO YOU GOT IT!"
Your position feels so empty. Sorry but to me they carry no weight anymore. Cheering for violence to happen because of being uncomfortable.
an arbitrary feedbackloop. As soon as someone is labeled as ignorant and unwilling by you they "have to look out for fists".
statement that you dont want to educate people you want to punch. The reason for that contrast is that your displayed logic goes into a
means you punch the people that are not educated and show no willingness to educate. And this position is something i contrasted with your
who are violent or offensive. Both are the result of not being educated about certain topics. It means that you punch the ignorant. And this
This is simply not true. First of all that is not an exagaration. You made clear that you will punch people who cant be reasoned with and
and https://www.al.com/news/2021/09/uab-police-investigating-campus-assault-of-man-claiming-to-be-preacher-captured-on-video.html
All the discussion aside: I dont see how the person attack first https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSC1kgPMOYY at 0:44
violence.
Now you are mixing up group and individual behavior. This discussion is about a man with a sign. And you talk about people that use physical
it can get. how is that not a hyperbole. I don't understand why you are denying the obvious. Its documented here.
You used them many times. Using terrorist as an example in a talk about how to confront political opinions of others. Thats the most extreme
Can you please point out one hyperbole i used?
You dont want to educate people you are about to punch. And you want to punch people for not being educated and not willing to get educated.
Not to me at least. You use many hyperbels. Inbetween you switched to making fun of my position and being cynical. That makes it hard for me
except for the part of not feeling empathy.
So i agree.
Nothing of what you refuted is something i said.
an illusion. I think people strive for freedom. It is extremly liberating to not have to cling to this life saver anymore. They will feel it
Everyone inherently wants to grow. Thats my assumption. Its humanism. If inorance is their life preserver then make them realize that its
yourself like this. Its like you don't want to take any responsibility. Thats just fearfull. You don't need to be.
do set up a normative value. Dont relativate this view. Stand up for it or be quiet. Its one thing to accept your faults.But dont relativate
I am being too technically here but i would call this "coercion".
You already have this power. We all do
Arent you the one that tried to take the context away by comparing this to terrorists? It is funny that you niow talk about accurate...
that violence has some sort of positive effect on either education or political progress. But there is not a single one.
And i don't know where you got this false assumption that i could never be convinced. I can be convinced with scientific studys that show
Its funny how defensive you get. Moral high ground is something i critized on you. This shows me that you did not read my comments.
Now that last one was a hyperbole. And im out. I don't like your hyper relativistic stances. It feels like your stance is all and nothing.
Will you also cheer on the guy that decides to punch his ex girlfriend because she made him uncomfortable? "GO! ONE MORE! BRO YOU GOT IT!"
Your position feels so empty. Sorry but to me they carry no weight anymore. Cheering for violence to happen because of being uncomfortable.
an arbitrary feedbackloop. As soon as someone is labeled as ignorant and unwilling by you they "have to look out for fists".
statement that you dont want to educate people you want to punch. The reason for that contrast is that your displayed logic goes into a
means you punch the people that are not educated and show no willingness to educate. And this position is something i contrasted with your
who are violent or offensive. Both are the result of not being educated about certain topics. It means that you punch the ignorant. And this
This is simply not true. First of all that is not an exagaration. You made clear that you will punch people who cant be reasoned with and
and https://www.al.com/news/2021/09/uab-police-investigating-campus-assault-of-man-claiming-to-be-preacher-captured-on-video.html
All the discussion aside: I dont see how the person attack first https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSC1kgPMOYY at 0:44
violence.
Now you are mixing up group and individual behavior. This discussion is about a man with a sign. And you talk about people that use physical
it can get. how is that not a hyperbole. I don't understand why you are denying the obvious. Its documented here.
You used them many times. Using terrorist as an example in a talk about how to confront political opinions of others. Thats the most extreme
Can you please point out one hyperbole i used?
You dont want to educate people you are about to punch. And you want to punch people for not being educated and not willing to get educated.
Not to me at least. You use many hyperbels. Inbetween you switched to making fun of my position and being cynical. That makes it hard for me
except for the part of not feeling empathy.
So i agree.
Nothing of what you refuted is something i said.
an illusion. I think people strive for freedom. It is extremly liberating to not have to cling to this life saver anymore. They will feel it
Everyone inherently wants to grow. Thats my assumption. Its humanism. If inorance is their life preserver then make them realize that its
yourself like this. Its like you don't want to take any responsibility. Thats just fearfull. You don't need to be.
do set up a normative value. Dont relativate this view. Stand up for it or be quiet. Its one thing to accept your faults.But dont relativate