36637 pts ยท June 5, 2013
This is my public profile. I apparently must write something about myself!
I remember this about Kenosha, except it was praised endlessly in the media and Imgur until they got outraged over a naive moronic teenager.
to be fair SCs are lunatics. I'll try to check your other stuff but I have work to get ready for.
presented were 'boogaloo boys' which is still a meme and then highlight of Sovereign Citizens which seems to constitute the bulk of concern
Sorry, looking over all the info takes a minute. One is a memoir that even has a footnote stating a lack of empirical analysis, the others
more like 'I live in a flood area, so I'll get water damage coverage' rather than invest in meteor insurance despite the damage potential.
There's a lot of things Trump 'could have done' in the lime light through out his who tenure, this is really just another notch.
Can't keep track of your links, think it might have been politico where it cited based on some youtube video of McInnes rambling.
high-crime low-income areas where drug charges carry mandatory minimums...
So you're bringing up prosecutors and judicial discretion over general front-line policing, which disproportionally has always targeted the
consider them as such if the charges are validated in court.
It's setting a standard of measure. I won't call every protester Antifa, but if they are arrested for arson or assault I would certainly
movement is paranoid. though I can see conflation with people being ignorant and stereotyping.
my point being is that shy of them shouting they are a racist or presenting something as such, thinking there is some massive hidden racist
The Memo essentially said it's a potential risk to be considered but there's no proven effort of infiltration occurring at all.
So an old memo that counters itself, one officer and a random former neonazi with the police admitting that bad cops can exist even if rare.
So your saying they are a massive threat, but are so pathetic they need to team up with everyone that they consider enemies to stay relevant
Sure thing, I'll start getting concerned if they can manage to collect enough funds to host a weeny roast outside of the boondocks.
Big news about a protest that would have been obscure were it not for the opponents of them, Streisand Effect if I recall.
Worst case scenario, I get accused of something and then mob-jumped.
If I simply don't follow the mob chanting I could be the target of them for not joining in on the chant as we saw with random restaurants.
When looking at the given attacks cited it's nearly random in nature beyond the more religiously linked ones on Clinics, comparatively
Because Antifa and BLM are actively participating in riots in my area, seems to make for a bit more extant threat.
It has to do with general risk assessment.
Again, I can form assessments fit for my situation, as such a bias is going to be present much like if you were considering your insurance.
So the target of statement didn't get it nor general public get it that means it was a flat response, bland, beige, ineffective, etc.
leaned into pressing for a condemnation.
No, I was proving a point on what would happen if given an ultimatum on a subject you had no information or preparation on, that's why I
I didn't say you said that, I am going based on your sources given.
Your sources cited attribute it to him.
I remember this about Kenosha, except it was praised endlessly in the media and Imgur until they got outraged over a naive moronic teenager.
to be fair SCs are lunatics. I'll try to check your other stuff but I have work to get ready for.
presented were 'boogaloo boys' which is still a meme and then highlight of Sovereign Citizens which seems to constitute the bulk of concern
Sorry, looking over all the info takes a minute. One is a memoir that even has a footnote stating a lack of empirical analysis, the others
more like 'I live in a flood area, so I'll get water damage coverage' rather than invest in meteor insurance despite the damage potential.
There's a lot of things Trump 'could have done' in the lime light through out his who tenure, this is really just another notch.
Can't keep track of your links, think it might have been politico where it cited based on some youtube video of McInnes rambling.
high-crime low-income areas where drug charges carry mandatory minimums...
So you're bringing up prosecutors and judicial discretion over general front-line policing, which disproportionally has always targeted the
consider them as such if the charges are validated in court.
It's setting a standard of measure. I won't call every protester Antifa, but if they are arrested for arson or assault I would certainly
movement is paranoid. though I can see conflation with people being ignorant and stereotyping.
my point being is that shy of them shouting they are a racist or presenting something as such, thinking there is some massive hidden racist
The Memo essentially said it's a potential risk to be considered but there's no proven effort of infiltration occurring at all.
So an old memo that counters itself, one officer and a random former neonazi with the police admitting that bad cops can exist even if rare.
So your saying they are a massive threat, but are so pathetic they need to team up with everyone that they consider enemies to stay relevant
Sure thing, I'll start getting concerned if they can manage to collect enough funds to host a weeny roast outside of the boondocks.
Big news about a protest that would have been obscure were it not for the opponents of them, Streisand Effect if I recall.
Worst case scenario, I get accused of something and then mob-jumped.
If I simply don't follow the mob chanting I could be the target of them for not joining in on the chant as we saw with random restaurants.
When looking at the given attacks cited it's nearly random in nature beyond the more religiously linked ones on Clinics, comparatively
Because Antifa and BLM are actively participating in riots in my area, seems to make for a bit more extant threat.
It has to do with general risk assessment.
Again, I can form assessments fit for my situation, as such a bias is going to be present much like if you were considering your insurance.
So the target of statement didn't get it nor general public get it that means it was a flat response, bland, beige, ineffective, etc.
leaned into pressing for a condemnation.
No, I was proving a point on what would happen if given an ultimatum on a subject you had no information or preparation on, that's why I
I didn't say you said that, I am going based on your sources given.
Your sources cited attribute it to him.