Expansix

58 pts ยท August 16, 2012


move to Svalbard (no visa required). After 7 years you'll become norwegian citizen. Then move to mainland. Profit?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Scoring like that is usually used with multiple choice to discourage guessing

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Might mean tests that are scored from 0 where a correct answer grants and a wrong one deducts. I've had some like that, where 5/10 means 0 .

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd guess it's related more to endurance than strenght. Weightlifting is short bursts compared to the extended activity of workplaces

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Where I'm from the definition is closer to: "To create and leverage fear in order to achieve political, ideological, or religous goals."

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Medical tech prevents a lot of death, so to an extent overpopulation is

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is one of the reasons I'm hesitant to buy it. It's not really the type of game I like, and don't feel like supporting those practices

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because too me it would not be a subjective matter. It would seem like an objective fact to me, because the bugs were there. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is interesting to me. Say I play a game that for me has too many bugs. I'd call it objectively bad, 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. The threshold for what is too many or too severe a bug is not defined afaik. So I suppose that is itself subjective

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True, but from what I have read there is a lot of bugs, some of which are long-standing and relatively easy to fix

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Note: Bad in this case refers to the quality of the games as it is put together (bugs, stability, etc.) not the experience itself. 4/4

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that the game doesn't have as many issues as people claim, then that might prove it isn't a bad game. 3/?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You disagreeing doesn't invalidate the claim that Fallout 76 is objectively bad. However if you can come with facts that prove 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's not what objectively means. When something is objective it's not influenced by personal opinions. 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wrong type of otter, it's the sea otters that rape baby seals. This is a river otter (probably Asian small-clawed otter)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Programming can be done without coding (node-based programming). Coding is always programming asfaik.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Coding == Writing code. Programming == Configuring a machine to perform specific tasks.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, the plot of the episode is more or less self-contained, but certain smaller things might not be. (Long time since last i saw it tho)

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I just love stories, both creating and perceiving. I feel at ease when I write. Like the world just slips away, it takes away the stress.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the Earth "fell". From there the story follows him trying to find out how he got back in time, and how to stop the imminent destruction.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

leaving most of Earth overgrown by plants, with every human fending for themselves. Jason is then thrown back in time to before (3/?)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The first arc is bound to a character named Jason, who grew up on Earth after a great unknown tragedy had struck,(2/?)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The story is currently kind of split into four parts, or four major story-arcs. Each major arc is bound to a specific character. (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0